Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

New Zealand 2026 election: How the parties differ on housing

The key distinction to watch is who each party wants to help, and how: renters facing high housing costs, first-home buyers trying to get a deposit together, or existing homeowners concerned about mortgages, rates and the value of their property.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, it is useful to compare housing policies across three groups, while separating policies already in force from new campaign promises. A party might help buyers through tax settings or deposit support, for example, while another might focus on building more homes, expanding public housing or strengthening renters’ rights.

1. The main parties at a glance

These are the main differences in the published policies I could verify as of 11 October 2026. This is a comparison of policy direction, not a ranking of parties.

Party Renters First-home buyers Existing homeowners
National Party Emphasises rental supply and market incentives rather than rent caps. Would widen access to 5% deposit First Home Loans by lifting the income cap to $300,000. National is backing first home buyers Focuses on market-led development and property ownership; also announced cheap loans for solar. National pledges solar loans for homeowners, planning reforms
Labour Party Promises renewed state-house building and funding for community housing providers. Focuses on housing supply and a proposed tax on investment-property gains, with the family home exempt. Start Work NowCapital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health System The proposed capital gains tax excludes the family home; Labour also offers solar without upfront costs. Capital Gains Tax to Level the Playing Field for Businesses, Create Jobs and Fix New Zealand's Health SystemLabour's 2026 Election Policies
Green Party Would cap annual rent increases at 2%, reverse no-cause evictions and introduce a Rental Warrant of Fitness. Would reverse landlord tax cuts and expand public housing, aiming to reduce competition from property investors. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis Would increase tax on property investment and speculation; ordinary family homes would not be the focus of its proposed changes. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis
ACT New Zealand Emphasises landlord incentives, fewer regulatory barriers and private-market supply. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand Emphasises making it easier to build more homes through planning and property-rights reforms. ACT New Zealand Emphasises property rights, development freedom and reducing planning delays. ACT New Zealand
New Zealand First Links housing pressure to population growth and infrastructure capacity; proposes prioritising citizens for social housing. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies Emphasises coordinating immigration, housing and infrastructure rather than a specific first-home deposit measure in the policies reviewed. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies Focuses on population planning and ensuring infrastructure keeps pace with development. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies
Te Pāti Māori Its housing platform emphasises more public and affordable homes. Supports easier building on Māori land and more affordable housing. Te Pāti Māori is the assertion of our mana motuhake and our liberationTe Pāti Māori: policies and record 2026 Emphasises access to Māori whenua and action against speculation and land banking. Te Pāti Māori: policies and record 2026

Important distinction: a policy announced during the campaign is a proposal, not a policy already implemented. Also, the detail and funding available for each party's housing proposals vary, so the table highlights documented commitments rather than assuming every party has a fully specified plan for all three groups.

2. What the differences mean for each group

If you rent

  • Greens: The clearest direct rent-control proposal among these parties: a 2% annual rent-increase cap, stronger eviction protections and rental-quality inspections. Greens announce plan to end homelessness & fix housing crisis
  • National and ACT: Put more emphasis on encouraging landlords and developers to provide rental homes, with the expectation that greater supply and competition can ease rents. ACT explicitly supports reducing regulatory barriers. ACT New ZealandACT New Zealand
  • Labour: Emphasises expanding public and community housing, which could give more households an alternative to the private rental market. Start Work Now
  • NZ First: Proposes prioritising citizens for social housing and linking population growth to housing and infrastructure capacity. NZ First Announces Immigration Reform Policies

The key question is whether you want more immediate protection against rent rises and eviction, or a strategy centred on increasing the number of homes available. Those approaches can also be combined, but they have different implications for tenants and landlords.

If you're saving for your first home

One important distinction: making a deposit easier to obtain is not the same as making a house cheaper. A low-deposit loan can help someone buy sooner, but the size of the mortgage and the ongoing repayments still matter. Policies that increase supply aim to address a different part of the affordability problem.

If you already own a home

For homeowners, it is worth distinguishing the family home from an investment property. A policy might leave your home untaxed but affect a second property, or make building easier without directly reducing your mortgage payments, insurance premiums or council rates.

3. How to compare the policies fairly

Three questions help reveal the practical trade-offs:

  1. How soon would it help? Rent protections and deposit assistance target specific barriers directly. New construction generally takes longer to deliver.
  2. Who pays? Tax changes, public housing investment, infrastructure spending and landlord incentives distribute costs differently between taxpayers, property investors and households.
  3. What happens to housing supply and prices? Easier access to credit can help buyers enter the market, while increased construction can expand supply. The actual effect on prices depends on how much additional housing is built relative to demand.

For the full, side-by-side policy detail, see Policy.nz's 2026 housing comparison. It lets you explore housing affordability, rental conditions, housing quality and public housing across the parties. Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

The bottom line: the main divide is between parties prioritising market-led construction and ownership access, and parties placing greater emphasis on renters' protections, public housing and changing property-investment incentives. For a particular household, the effects depend on whether it rents, is trying to buy, owns its home outright, has a mortgage or owns additional properties.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct housing strategies. The major blocs approach the market through contrasting lenses—balancing supply-side regulatory reform, tax adjustments (such as capital gains discussions), and targeted support for distinct groups.

Here is how the main party platforms differ across renters, first-home buyers, and existing homeowners:


1. Renters

  • Left-Leaning / Progressive Parties (Labour, Greens): Focus heavily on bolstering tenant rights and rental affordability. Proposals include strengthening tenant protections, pushing for quality standards (such as an independently enforced Rental Warrant of Fitness), and in some platforms, capping annual rent increases to shield tenants from steep cost-of-living spikes.
  • Right-Leaning / Center Parties (National, ACT, NZ First): Emphasize that the best way to help renters is by increasing total housing supply (streamlining consenting and planning laws) to create more tenant choice and competition among landlords. They generally favor market-driven solutions over heavy regulatory restrictions on landlords, arguing that strict regulations can inadvertently shrink rental supply.

2. First-Home Buyers

  • National & Right-Leaning Parties: Focus on easing entry barriers through financial mechanisms and planning reform. This includes policies to expand access to low-deposit schemes (such as 5% First Home Loans) and freeing up land release to moderate house price growth over the long term.
  • Left & Minor Parties: Often target property speculation to level the playing field. Measures include tax changes (like capital gains frameworks or land-banking taxes) designed to curb investor competition against owner-occupiers, alongside boosts to KiwiSaver access or targeted construction support for affordable starter homes.

3. Existing Homeowners

  • Tax and Equity Distinction: Major tax proposals—such as Labour's proposed capital gains tax—explicitly exclude the family home, meaning owner-occupiers are generally insulated from direct capital levies on their primary residence.
  • Broader Economic Pressures: Economists note that for existing homeowners, election policy changes often take a backseat to broader economic fundamentals. Interest rate movements dictated by the Reserve Bank's Official Cash Rate (OCR) and employment stability dictate mortgage servicing costs and property market momentum far more than individual party manifestos.

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties' housing plans differ for renters, first-home buyers and existing homeowners?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have outlined distinct approaches to housing that vary significantly depending on whether a person is renting, trying to buy their first home, or already owns property.

As documented in party manifestos and public policy breakdowns on platforms like Policy.nz and reporting from outlets like The Conversation, the major parties approach these groups with differing priorities regarding regulation, financial assistance, and taxation.


1. For Renters

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on tenant security and rights within the rental market. Labour has pledged to oppose and reverse recent changes allowing 90-day "no-cause" terminations for periodic tenancies, arguing that tenants require long-term stability and protection against unfair evictions. They have also proposed initiatives like low-interest, government-backed financing options to help lower utility/energy costs (such as home solar setups) which can benefit both renters and homeowners where applicable.

  • National Party: Emphasizes overall housing supply as the primary mechanism to stabilize rental markets rather than aggressive new tenancy restrictions. Their focus centers on freeing up land and enabling construction pipelines to reduce the upward pressure on rental prices through broader market availability.

  • Green / Minor Parties: Tend to advocate for stronger structural interventions for renters, such as enforceable rental warrants of fitness (ensuring minimum insulation, heating, and dryness standards) and, in some proposals from minor progressive voices, exploring forms of rent regulation or limitations on annual rent increases. [Policy.nz]

2. For First-Home Buyers

  • National Party: Announced a dedicated policy targeting first-home buyers by widening access to the government’s First Home Loan scheme. National proposes raising the income cap for buyers wanting to utilize a low 5% deposit (administered via Kāinga Ora and participating lenders) to a combined or individual threshold of $300,000—a substantial increase from previous caps (which were $95,000 for single buyers and $150,000 for multiple buyers/single buyers with dependents). They frame this as a tool to lift home-ownership rates closer to 74%.

  • Labour Party: Focuses on expanding social and affordable housing supply pipelines—committing major funding (such as a $4 billion pledge targeting at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years)—which aims to take pressure off the lower end of the housing spectrum. They also support utilizing KiwiSaver frameworks and targeted construction support to make entry-level housing more attainable.

  • ACT / Right-Leaning Perspectives: Generally prioritize aggressive zoning reform, Local Government Act overhauls, and infrastructure funding to cut red tape, arguing that the best way to help first-home buyers is to drastically lower the absolute cost of building and buying houses through a surge in private development supply.

3. For Existing Homeowners & Property Investors

  • National Party: Maintains a position against introducing broad new property taxes or capital gains taxes on residential housing, aiming to provide a stable regulatory environment for existing owner-occupiers and current property holders.

  • Labour and Progressive Parties: Place a heavier emphasis on tax fairness across the wider property sector. Proposals from parties on the left often include reinstating or adjusting interest-deductibility rules for landlords or evaluating broader comprehensive capital gains frameworks (while typically protecting the family home/owner-occupier residences from direct capital gains taxes) to level the playing field between residential property investors and other forms of investment.

  • ACT Party: Focuses on property rights, opposing new property taxes, and protecting landlord/investor incentives, arguing that penalizing property investors restricts the private rental pool and drives up costs for tenants.


If you would like to explore a specific party's full manifesto or dive deeper into a particular housing issue (such as taxation policies or zoning laws), let me know how you would like to proceed.

Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account