Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 2

Every question, every answer, every source

All 174 questions and the 793 answers produced on 12 October 2026. The 27 remaining cells produced no AI Overview.

questions
174
answers saved
793
collected
12 Oct 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    nz-election-2026-questions.csv

    One row per unchanged question.

    id, draft, text, voterCode, issue, towns

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Answers

    nz-election-2026-answers.csv

    One row per produced answer, with its complete original text.

    result id, prompt id, draft id, scenario id, platform, region, words, parties, literal url answer, associated source answer, temporal pair, common four platforms, response text

    793rows

    Download answers (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    nz-election-2026-sources.csv

    One row per website associated with an answer; repeated citations count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, region, domain, publisher

    4,137rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    nz-election-2026-checks.csv

    One row per reviewed proposition, retaining both answers, extracts and the reviewed change.

    check, draft id, platform, claim, verdict, assessment, source url, source label, source date, checked date, old result id, new result id, old excerpt, new excerpt

    15rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Who to vote for: coding

    nz-election-2026-guidance.csv

    One row per manually reviewed guidance answer. Codes overlap; original answers supply the evidence.

    draft, assistant, q, voter, a, declined, matched, shortlist, asked, chose, extract

    31rows

    Download who to vote for: coding (CSV)

  • Location and national answers

    nz-election-2026-towns.csv

    One row per matched national/location pair, with both editions.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, issue, platform, city, edition 1 same party set, edition 1 national result, edition 1 city result, edition 2 same party set, edition 2 national result, edition 2 city result

    124rows

    Download location and national answers (CSV)

  • Changes between editions

    nz-election-2026-comparisons.csv

    One row per identical question, assistant and location across the two collections.

    prompt id, draft id, scenario id, scenario, issue, platform, region, old result id, new result id, old words, new words, same party set, old parties, new parties, added parties, removed parties, literal same domains, literal old domains, literal new domains, literal added domains, literal removed domains, associated same domains, associated old domains, associated new domains, associated added domains, associated removed domains

    793rows

    Download changes between editions (CSV)

  • No AI Overview produced

    nz-election-2026-coverage.csv

    One row per planned cell where no AI Overview was produced.

    prompt id, platform, region, draft id, block, scenario id, scenario, issue, priority, question, cause, availability

    27rows

    Download no ai overview produced (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve mental health and addiction services, and what would change for people seeking help?

New Zealand 2026 election: Mental health and addiction services

The key question for voters is not just how much each party promises to spend on mental health. It is whether people will be able to get help sooner, afford treatment, find support close to home, and access appropriate care when addiction or a mental health crisis becomes severe.

For New Zealand's 2026 general election, it's useful to compare party proposals across five practical issues:

  • Access and waiting times: Can people get an appointment before their problems worsen?
  • Cost: Will counselling, therapy, addiction treatment and medication be more affordable?
  • Community support: Can people get help through GPs, schools, community organisations and local services?
  • Addiction and recovery: What support is available for alcohol and drug dependence, withdrawal, rehabilitation and long-term recovery?
  • Crisis and specialist care: Will there be better access to crisis teams, inpatient treatment and support after discharge?

One important distinction: an election promise is not the same as a funded, implemented service. The details of eligibility, staffing, funding and delivery determine what changes for people seeking help.

What the main parties are proposing

The following comparison draws on parties' responses published by Changing Minds on 3 September 2026, alongside current official policy information. Some parties have not yet published their full election plans, so the comparison reflects what they have publicly stated rather than a complete list of final commitments. Responses from the political partiesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

Labour Party

Emphasis: early intervention, affordability and joined-up care

Labour says it wants to intervene before people reach crisis, prioritise children and young people, fund community services and peer support, and improve coordination between GPs, addiction providers, crisis teams and specialists. It also highlights the effects of housing insecurity, low incomes and employment on mental wellbeing.

What could change for someone seeking help: More emphasis on youth-friendly crisis alternatives, earlier support through schools and communities, and fewer gaps between services. Labour has yet to publish the full mental health and addiction policy in the response reviewed. Responses from the political partiesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

National Party

Emphasis: faster access, frontline staffing and crisis response

National says it will continue its existing approach of expanding access to primary mental health support, funding specialist services and strengthening crisis responses. It points to peer support workers in emergency departments, Crisis Recovery Cafés and other community settings, as well as longer-term contracts for community providers.

The party reported more than $34 million in additional annual funding for community mental health and addiction services from July 2026, and says about 83% of providers will have three-year contracts.

What could change for someone seeking help: Potentially more consistent community support and peer-led alternatives during a crisis. National's specific new election policy was still to be announced in the response reviewed. Responses from the political partiesMental health and addiction targets

Green Party

Emphasis: community care, prevention and culturally appropriate services

The Greens propose shifting emphasis away from an over-reliance on hospital and crisis-based responses towards ongoing local support. Their stated priorities include youth one-stop shops, kaupapa Māori and Pacific services, peer-led support, whānau-inclusive care and stable long-term funding for community organisations. They also want people with lived experience to have greater decision-making power.

What could change for someone seeking help: More options outside hospital, stronger culturally grounded services and a greater role for community providers in designing care. The practical effect would depend on the funding and workforce commitments ultimately adopted. Responses from the political partiesRoadmap for mental health, addiction, and wellbeing | Te Hiringa Mahara—Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission

New Zealand First

Emphasis: local access, mobile services and crisis response

NZ First proposes reviewing GP funding so clinics can integrate mental health and allied health services, funding Gumboot Friday at $6 million annually, deploying mobile health buses to rural communities and establishing Mental Health Response Units for acute distress. It also proposes expanding addiction services supporting detoxification in corrections.

What could change for someone seeking help: More local or mobile options, potential access to mental health professionals through GP clinics, and a different response to acute distress. The effectiveness of these measures would depend on where services are deployed, available staff and how they connect people to ongoing care. Responses from the political parties

ACT New Zealand

Emphasis: full mental health plan not yet confirmed in the source reviewed

ACT had not responded to Changing Minds' mental health policy questionnaire by its publication date. It would therefore be misleading to attribute specific new mental health or addiction service proposals to the party on the basis of that source.

ACT has separately proposed tighter independent medical assessments for health-related benefits, including reassessing some existing recipients with mental health conditions. That is a welfare policy, not a commitment to expand treatment services. Responses from the political partiesACT New Zealand

Te Pāti Māori

Emphasis: full response not available in the source reviewed

Te Pāti Māori had also not responded to the questionnaire by the publication date. Its detailed 2026 commitments on mental health access, addiction treatment and service funding cannot be reliably summarised from that source alone. Responses from the political parties

What would actually change for people seeking help?

The differences become clearer when you look at the experience of someone trying to get treatment, rather than just the policy language.

If you need… The proposed direction What to check before assuming things will improve
Help with anxiety, depression or distress Earlier support through primary care and community services Will counselling be free or subsidised, and how soon can you be seen?
Help for a child or teenager More prevention, school and youth-focused support Will there be a local service, and what happens if the young person needs specialist care?
Help with alcohol or drug addiction Community-based support, addiction services and early intervention Are detox, residential rehabilitation and ongoing recovery support funded and available?
Help during a mental health crisis Crisis alternatives, peer support and proposed response units Can people get a timely clinical assessment without relying on an emergency department?
Support outside major centres Mobile services and stronger local providers Will services have enough staff and operate consistently in rural communities?
Culturally appropriate care More community-led, kaupapa Māori, Pacific and whānau-inclusive approaches among some parties Will funding support actual service capacity and continuity of care?

These are potential changes, not guarantees. Responses from the political partiesAction Plan to Prevent and Reduce Substance Harm 2026 – 2029Roadmap for mental health, addiction, and wellbeing | Te Hiringa Mahara—Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission

What is already planned nationally?

There is an important baseline against which to judge new promises: the Government's Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2026–2036, published in August 2026.

The strategy sets out five measurable targets: Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2026–2036 online versionMental health and addiction targets

1 week

Primary mental health and addiction care

The target is for 80% of people accessing services through the Access and Choice programme to be seen within one week.

3 weeks

Specialist services

The target is for 80% of people accessing specialist mental health and addiction services to be seen within three weeks.

6 hours

Emergency departments

The target is for 95% of mental health and addiction emergency presentations to result in admission, discharge or transfer within six hours.

500/year

Workforce

Train 500 mental health and addiction practitioners each year.

25%

Prevention

Direct 25% of mental health and addiction investment towards prevention and early intervention.

These are system targets, not a promise that every person will receive treatment within those timeframes. The strategy also proposes a more connected system, with shared referral pathways, community support, telehealth and better transitions between primary, specialist and crisis care. Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2026–2036 online versionAction Plan to Prevent and Reduce Substance Harm 2026 – 2029

The key election question is which parties would maintain these targets, strengthen them, fund them differently or change the way they are delivered.

How to compare the parties on addiction specifically

Mental health and addiction are related, but a party's general mental health promises do not necessarily mean it has a comprehensive addiction plan.

The Ministry of Health's 2026–2029 Action Plan to Prevent and Reduce Substance Harm identifies four areas to watch: prevention and harm reduction, timely community-based services, a skilled addiction workforce, and better monitoring of outcomes. Action Plan to Prevent and Reduce Substance Harm 2026 – 2029

When assessing party commitments, look for specific answers to these questions:

  • Will people be able to access medically supervised withdrawal or detox when they need it?
  • Will there be more places in residential rehabilitation, and support after leaving treatment?
  • Will treatment be available for people who have both addiction and mental health difficulties?
  • Will harm reduction and early intervention be expanded?
  • Will people be able to get support without having to wait until their condition becomes severe?

A party may support prevention or tougher responses to substance-related harm without necessarily committing to more treatment places. Those are different policy choices, with different consequences for people seeking recovery.

Where to compare the latest commitments

For a broader check of policy details as parties release their manifestos:

Bottom line: Labour emphasises early intervention and connected services; National emphasises faster access, frontline capacity and continuity for community providers; the Greens emphasise community-led and culturally grounded support; and NZ First has proposed more local access and new crisis-response options. For ACT and Te Pāti Māori, the sources reviewed do not establish a complete set of new election commitments.

For someone seeking help, the most meaningful distinction will be whether a party's promises translate into affordable appointments, shorter waits, enough trained staff, accessible addiction treatment and reliable follow-up care—not simply a new target or announcement.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve mental health and addiction services, and what would change for people seeking help?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, mental health and addiction services form a major point of discussion, with political parties proposing distinct structural and financial approaches. The debate centers on addressing persistent workforce shortages, reducing high wait times, and shifting resources closer to communities.

Party Approaches and Policies

  • National and Governing Parties: The National-led approach leans toward continuity, capacity building, target-driven delivery, and streamlining administrative structures. This includes supporting administrative consolidation—such as proposals around a broader Ministry of Health and Wellbeing oversight—while utilizing existing funding baselines and public-private models to expand health infrastructure.
  • Labour Party: Labour focuses heavily on lowering the financial barriers to primary healthcare, which feeds into early intervention for mental distress. Their platform features initiatives like three free GP or nurse visits annually via a "Medicard" system and removing the $5 prescription charge, alongside policies aimed at bolstering primary care capacity (such as support schemes for general practice ownership).
  • Green Party: The Greens advocate for an extensive expansion of fully publicly funded and free healthcare services, explicitly including mental health, counseling, and psychological care. Their policy aims to eliminate therapy waiting lists by scaling up the training and employment of diverse practitioners (including psychologists, social workers, psychotherapists, and occupational therapists) and embedding services directly into community and workplace settings.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Te Pāti Māori places a strong emphasis on tino rangatiratanga and equitable outcomes, pushing for structural reform that rebuilds and strengthens Māori-led health authorities and Kaupapa Māori mental health and suicide prevention services.
  • ACT and New Zealand First: ACT and NZ First generally emphasize clinical need over separate ethnicity-based frameworks. ACT focuses on streamlining health administration and expanding the health workforce via targeted incentives, while NZ First concentrates on reducing waitlists, boosting specific regional workforces, and supporting structured trials and evidence-based additions to medical funding.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): TOP advocates for a 10-year, cross-party enduring health plan to protect primary and mental health funding from shifting electoral cycles, alongside lifting overall health spending relative to GDP.

What Would Change for People Seeking Help?

Depending on which party or coalition platform shapes the post-election landscape, the practical experience for individuals navigating mental health and addiction services could shift in several ways:

  • Cost and Affordability: Under policies from parties like Labour or the Greens, out-of-pocket costs for seeing a primary care doctor, counselor, or acquiring necessary prescriptions would drop significantly or disappear entirely, removing financial barriers that often delay early help-seeking.
  • Access and Wait Times: If major workforce-expansion policies are implemented (such as training and recruiting more clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and specialized mental health nurses), wait times for specialized care could decrease. Conversely, without deep structural interventions, high thresholds for specialist care and regional workforce shortages risk leaving rural and high-need communities facing ongoing bottlenecks.
  • Cultural Safety and Delivery: For Māori, Pacific peoples, and rainbow communities, shifts toward Kaupapa Māori-led services or guaranteed protected funding for targeted care would mean more localized, culturally aligned support options rather than standard one-size-fits-all models.
  • System Stability: A move toward long-term, cross-party funding frameworks (as proposed by minor parties like TOP) aims to give communities greater certainty, ensuring that community mental health providers do not face sudden restructuring or funding shifts with every change of government.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: How do parties plan to improve mental health and addiction services, and what would change for people seeking help?

Ahead of and during the 2026 New Zealand general election cycle, political parties have outlined distinct approaches to addressing mental health and addiction services across the country. According to analyses from health sector groups and party manifestos, strategies range from strengthening primary care integration to expanding specialized and kaupapa Māori services, with differing views on funding mechanisms and structural priorities.

Overview of Party Positions and Proposals

  • National Party / Current Government Approach: The incumbent National-led administration has emphasized creating a dedicated ministerial portfolio for mental health and maximizing existing health funding efficiency. Their stated approach focuses on driving current resources further, supporting frontline delivery, and working through integrated primary care structures rather than broad systemic overhauls. For people seeking help, this approach aims to streamline navigation within existing primary and community health networks.
  • Labour Party: Parties on the centre-left, including Labour, have focused on broader financial relief within the public health framework—such as policies aimed at making general practitioner (GP) visits more affordable or free—arguing that cost is a primary barrier to early mental health intervention. For individuals seeking help, this would mean fewer financial obstacles when first presenting mental health or addiction concerns to a family doctor. [Policy.nz]
  • Green Party: The Green Party manifesto places a heavy emphasis on preventative care and universal access, calling for expanded mental health and wellbeing services embedded directly within all schools and educational settings, as well as dedicated youth health hubs in every region. For young people and families seeking assistance, this model proposes accessible, free "one-stop shop" environments before issues reach a clinical crisis point. [mentalhealth.org.nz]
  • Te Pāti Māori: Te Pāti Māori advocates for the significant scaling up and resourcing of kaupapa Māori mental health and addiction services. They emphasize that mainstream systems often fail indigenous populations due to structural inequities, and argue for community-led, culturally grounded holistic care. For tāngata whaiora (those seeking wellness) and whānau, this shift would prioritize culturally aligned treatment options. [mentalhealth.org.nz]
  • ACT New Zealand: ACT’s approach to the wider health and state sector centers on fiscal restraint, prioritizing back-office efficiency, and scrutinizing government spending. While emphasizing economic discipline, their framework relies on structured delivery models and targeted administration rather than sweeping new social spending programs.
  • New Zealand First & Other Parties: New Zealand First alongside other movements generally emphasizes law-and-order and social stability intersections, such as addressing addiction as a driver of community harm alongside targeted frontline support. The Opportunity Party has similarly highlighted early intervention for youth and addressing underlying drivers like addiction and neurodivergence in social support systems.

What Would Change for People Seeking Help?

  • Early Access vs. Crisis Threshold: Advocacy groups like the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) and the Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand have noted that despite varying party commitments, the everyday experience for someone seeking help largely hinges on bridging the gap between mild-to-moderate distress and specialized secondary care.
  • Financial and Geographic Barriers: Depending on which party or coalition implements post-election policy, changes for patients may include altered co-payments for primary mental health consultations through GPs, expanded availability of youth-oriented community hubs, or greater availability of kaupapa Māori providers. However, sector experts caution that tangible changes on the ground depend heavily on sustained workforce expansion and long-term funding stability rather than shifting political mandates alone.
Ask anything

Captured 12 October 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account