Evidence · Home and contents insurance

Every question, every answer, every source

Explore all 372 home and contents insurance questions and the 1,476 answers saved on 11 October 2026. Read the original responses and download the tables behind the study’s comparisons, sources, sentiment and factual checks.

questions
372
answers saved, of 1488 planned
1476
consumer situations
12
named regions
16
AI platforms
4

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question went to the four AI platforms. All were collected with a New Zealand setting. Open a question to read every captured answer in full.

Showing 20 of 372 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its exact saved wording.

    Question ID, source references, question, consumer situation, named regions, question group and collection setting

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per captured answer, with its full text.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, collection setting, consumer situation, named regions and full answer

  • Sources by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, assistant, collection setting, website and publisher type

  • Checks against primary sources

    checks.csv

    One row per stated assertion checked, for one platform.

    Check, question and answer IDs, assistant, exact passage, verdict, primary-source finding, URL and date

  • Consumer recommendation coding

    consumer-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a consumer-selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, counted recommendation, exact passage and conditions

  • Consumer selection membership

    consumer-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched consumer-selection comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; twelve home and twelve contents selection questions, with missing captures preserved

  • Ongoing support coding

    support-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed named-provider role in an eligible support answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, support-preference decision and exact passage

  • Ongoing support membership

    support-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the actual consumer-support group.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; acquisition validation is excluded

  • Regional recommendation coding

    regional-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a region-named selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform, provider, recommendation decision and exact passage

  • Regional selection membership

    regional-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched regional comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform and equal-comparison membership; four home and three contents platform answers per region

  • Insurer sentiment

    insurer-sentiment.csv

    One row per unique saved claim about an insurer in a selection answer.

    Claim, question and answer IDs, insurer, saved stance, exact passage and original-answer offsets

  • Recorded source URLs

    source-urls.csv

    One row per recorded answer, website and URL association.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, website, URL, source records and presence in the captured answer text

  • Matched consumer platform membership

    platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, consumer and platform; 22 identical questions per platform

  • Matched regional platform membership

    regional-platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question regional platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, region and platform; 31 identical questions per platform

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

ChatGPT · New Zealand

Are customer star ratings a good way to compare NZ contents insurers?

Yes, but customer star ratings are best used as a starting point, not as the main way to compare contents insurers in New Zealand.

A high rating can suggest that customers are happy with an insurer's service, communication and claims handling. However, it doesn't necessarily mean the policy offers better protection, has fewer exclusions or will pay out more when you make a claim.

The best approach is to use customer ratings to assess service quality, then compare the actual policy wording, cover limits, exclusions and price.

What customer star ratings can tell you

What ratings can indicate What they can't reliably tell you
Customer satisfaction with service Whether your belongings are adequately covered
Experiences with claims and complaints Whether a future claim will be accepted
Ease of contacting the insurer How much you'll receive for a particular loss
Common frustrations or praise Whether the policy offers the best value for money

One important limitation is that online reviews often overrepresent people with particularly good or bad experiences. Ratings can also combine reviews about car, home and contents insurance, so they may not reflect contents customers specifically.

What matters more when comparing NZ contents insurers?

I would assess insurers in this order:

  1. Cover and exclusions

Check accidental damage, theft, natural disasters, belongings away from home, and cover for valuables such as jewellery, bikes and electronics. Read the exclusions carefully. How to get the best house and contents insuranceWhat Home, Contents & Car Insurance Don't Cover (NZ)

  1. Claims payouts and excesses

Check whether belongings are replaced new-for-old or paid at depreciated value, plus the limits for individual items and how much you'll pay towards a claim. How to get the best house and contents insuranceInsurance Health Check: Review Your Cover

  1. Customer satisfaction and claims experience

Look for independent surveys that measure communication, ease of claiming, claims turnaround and overall satisfaction. These are generally more useful than an unexplained star rating. Home & Contents Insurance Star Ratings and AwardsBest and worst insurance companies in New Zealand

  1. Premium and value

Compare annual premiums for equivalent cover, including excesses and optional extras. The cheapest policy may leave you with less protection. House and contents insuranceConsumer Guides

Which NZ ratings should you trust?

Two useful places to start are:

When looking at any star rating, check the number of reviews, how recently they were posted, whether reviewers actually made claims, and whether the score relates specifically to contents insurance.

My recommendation

Use star ratings to narrow your shortlist, but let the policy details and independent claims-satisfaction evidence decide the winner. A slightly lower-rated insurer with substantially better cover for your belongings could be the better choice.

One question that would help me tailor the comparison: are you looking for contents insurance as a renter, a homeowner, or a flatmate? The most important policy features can differ quite a bit between them.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 11 October 2026

Gemini · New Zealand

Are customer star ratings a good way to compare NZ contents insurers?

Customer star ratings can be a useful starting point for comparing New Zealand contents insurers, but they are not comprehensive on their own.

When looking at star ratings in the New Zealand market—such as those from Canstar (which evaluates policy features, cost, and overall customer satisfaction) or consumer sentiment surveys by Consumer NZ—it helps to understand what they do well and where they fall short.


The Pros: Why Star Ratings Help

  • Structured Feature Comparison: Independent research ratings (like Canstar’s 5-star system) look past flashy marketing to score policies on tangible benefits, such as whether they offer "new for old" replacement, accidental damage cover, temporary accommodation limits, and flexibility around excesses.
  • Aggregated Consumer Feedback: Awards focused on "Most Satisfied Customers" aggregate thousands of Kiwi experiences regarding communication, ease of filing a claim, and repair turnaround times.
  • Quick Filtering: They allow you to rapidly narrow down the dozens of options in the New Zealand general insurance market to a shortlist of top-performing providers.

The Cons: Where Star Ratings Fall Short

  • They Lack Personalisation: A 5-star rated policy for one person might be poorly suited to another. Star ratings rarely account for specific regional risks (e.g., flood zones in Westport or earthquake-prone ground conditions in Wellington) or your specific mix of high-value items (like jewellery or art).
  • The "Cost vs. Cover" Trade-off: An insurer might score high for having extremely comprehensive, premium features, but that may come with a heavy price tag. Conversely, a budget insurer might drop stars due to fewer policy bells and whistles, even if it suits a thrifty renter perfectly.
  • Crowdsourced Bias: Raw user reviews on open platforms (like Google or Trustpilot) can skew heavily negative. People rarely log online just to say their insurance worked routinely; instead, reviews are often dominated by frustrated customers experiencing a disputed claim or premium hike.

A Better Way to Compare NZ Insurers

To make a sound choice, combine star ratings with these critical steps:

  1. Check Financial Strength Ratings: In New Zealand, always verify the insurer's Reserve Bank-mandated Insurer Financial Strength Rating (issued by agencies like Standard & Poor's or AM Best). This tells you if the company has the financial capital to survive a major disaster (like another Canterbury or Kaikōura earthquake sequence). Most major NZ providers carry an "A" rating or higher.
  2. Read the PDS (Policy Wording): Minor definition differences matter. Check the sub-limits on portable items (e.g., laptops or phones stolen outside the home), accidental damage exclusions, and how they calculate your contents sum insured.
  3. Get Multiple Quotes: Premiums for the exact same level of cover can vary wildly between providers depending on your age, location, and security measures.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 11 October 2026

AI Overviews · New Zealand

Are customer star ratings a good way to compare NZ contents insurers?

AI Overview

Customer star ratings are a flawed way to compare New Zealand contents insurers on their own. While they provide a snapshot of user sentiment during the sign-up process, they rarely reflect how an insurer behaves when you actually make a claim.

To choose the right contents insurance, look beyond star ratings and prioritize independent consumer reviews and specific policy terms.


Why Star Ratings Can Mislead You

  • The "Happy Sign-Up" Bias: Most 5-star ratings are submitted immediately after a seamless, digital onboarding process. A smooth website doesn't guarantee a smooth payout after a house flood or burglary.

  • Lack of Claim Testing: The average customer rates a company before experiencing a major loss. The true test of a contents insurer is their claims department, where ratings often drop due to long delays or strict policy limits.

  • Misunderstood Coverage: Customers frequently leave 1-star ratings simply because they did not understand their policy exclusions (e.g., cell phone sub-limits or gradual water damage), which is a user error rather than poor service from the company.


What to Compare Instead

Instead of generic star ratings, evaluate New Zealand contents insurers using these data points:

Feature to Check Why It Matters
Independent Surveys Look at the annual Consumer NZ insurance satisfaction surveys. They interview customers who have gone through the actual claims process.
Policy Sub-Limits Check the caps on high-value items. Many policies limit payouts for jewelry, bicycles, or mobile phones to $1,000–$2,000 unless you specify them on the policy.
Financial Strength Ensure the insurer has a strong rating (e.g., A or A+ from AM Best or Fitch) to confirm they have the capital to pay claims after regional natural disasters.
Excess and Premiums Compare how adjusting your excess alters your premium. New Zealand premiums have climbed sharply due to climate risks, making standard comparison critical.

If you want to find the best policy for your situation, let me know:

  • Are you a renter or a homeowner?

  • Do you own high-value items like expensive jewelry, tech, or sports gear?

  • Are you looking for the lowest price or the most comprehensive cover?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026

Google AI Mode · New Zealand

Are customer star ratings a good way to compare NZ contents insurers?

Customer star ratings and satisfaction scores can be a helpful starting point when comparing New Zealand contents insurers, but they have distinct limitations. Whether they are a "good" way depends on how you use them alongside the actual fine print of the policy.

Pros of Using Customer Star Ratings and Surveys

  • Snapshot of real-world claims: Independent trackers like Consumer NZ's Insurance Satisfaction Survey or commercial frameworks like Canstar's Star Ratings highlight how companies actually handle communication, support, and payouts when things go wrong.

  • Identifying standouts: They quickly surface top performers—such as customer-focused mutuals or specific brands consistently rated highly for value and service—and flag providers that chronically lag behind the industry average. [Consumer NZ]

  • Ease of filtering: Star ratings compress a massive amount of data (pricing, features, customer feedback) into a single, digestible metric, saving time during your initial shortlist process. [Canstar NZ]

Cons and Limitations

  • Subjectivity of customer reviews: A high or low star rating is often heavily influenced by a single emotional interaction (either a great claims handler or a frustrating delay) rather than an objective measure of policy robustness.

  • Cost vs. coverage weighting: Methodology varies. Commercial star ratings might weigh specific policy features and price points that don't match your personal priorities (for instance, you might care more about low excess options or specific high-value item coverage than general "value for money"). [Canstar NZ]

  • Excluding the fine print: Ratings rarely capture subtle exclusions, sub-limits on specific categories (like jewelry or electronics), or differences in how "sum insured" vs. "total replacement" policies are calculated.

A Balanced Approach

Relying solely on a star rating can lead to overlooking a policy that is a better custom fit for your specific household assets. Instead, use a multi-step approach:

  1. Shortlist via ratings: Use trusted local sources like Consumer NZ to weed out poorly rated insurers with bad claims track records.
  2. Compare policy wording: Look past the stars to check specific sub-limits, standard excesses, and whether you need accidental damage vs. fire and theft only.
  3. Get direct quotes: Premium costs vary wildly between providers for the exact same level of risk based on your specific New Zealand location (e.g., earthquake or flood-prone zones).

Would you like help looking at specific features to compare between NZ contents policies, or are you trying to decide between particular insurance providers?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026