ChatGPT · New Zealand
Would choosing a higher excess actually save me enough to make it worthwhile?
Yes — choosing a higher insurance excess can be worthwhile, but only if the premium savings justify the extra amount you'd have to pay when making a claim. In New Zealand, the best choice depends on your type of insurance, how much you save each year, and whether you could comfortably afford the higher excess if something went wrong.
The key is to compare the actual dollar savings against the extra financial risk, rather than simply choosing the cheapest premium.
A quick example
Suppose you're considering increasing your excess from $500 to $1,500.
| Current excess | Higher excess | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual premium | $1,200 | $900 |
| Excess if you claim | $500 | $1,500 |
| Annual saving | — | $300 |
You save $300 each year, but you would pay an extra $1,000 if you make a claim.
- After 1 year without a claim, you're $300 better off.
- After 3 claim-free years, you've saved $900.
- After 4 claim-free years, you've saved $1,200, enough to offset that extra $1,000 excess.
These are illustrative figures, not an actual insurance quote. The general principle is supported by New Zealand's Consumer Protection insurance guidance. InsuranceICNZ Consumer Guide 2025
Let's work out whether it makes sense for you
I can calculate the break-even point using your actual numbers.
My rule of thumb: choose a higher excess if the premium reduction is meaningful, you rarely claim, and you could pay the full excess tomorrow without going into debt. If the saving is small or the excess would strain your finances, keeping the lower excess may be the better choice.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Captured 11 October 2026