Evidence · Home and contents insurance

Every question, every answer, every source

Explore all 372 home and contents insurance questions and the 1,476 answers saved on 11 October 2026. Read the original responses and download the tables behind the study’s comparisons, sources, sentiment and factual checks.

questions
372
answers saved, of 1488 planned
1476
consumer situations
12
named regions
16
AI platforms
4

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question went to the four AI platforms. All were collected with a New Zealand setting. Open a question to read every captured answer in full.

Showing 20 of 372 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its exact saved wording.

    Question ID, source references, question, consumer situation, named regions, question group and collection setting

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per captured answer, with its full text.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, collection setting, consumer situation, named regions and full answer

  • Sources by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, assistant, collection setting, website and publisher type

  • Checks against primary sources

    checks.csv

    One row per stated assertion checked, for one platform.

    Check, question and answer IDs, assistant, exact passage, verdict, primary-source finding, URL and date

  • Consumer recommendation coding

    consumer-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a consumer-selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, counted recommendation, exact passage and conditions

  • Consumer selection membership

    consumer-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched consumer-selection comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; twelve home and twelve contents selection questions, with missing captures preserved

  • Ongoing support coding

    support-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed named-provider role in an eligible support answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, support-preference decision and exact passage

  • Ongoing support membership

    support-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the actual consumer-support group.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; acquisition validation is excluded

  • Regional recommendation coding

    regional-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a region-named selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform, provider, recommendation decision and exact passage

  • Regional selection membership

    regional-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched regional comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform and equal-comparison membership; four home and three contents platform answers per region

  • Insurer sentiment

    insurer-sentiment.csv

    One row per unique saved claim about an insurer in a selection answer.

    Claim, question and answer IDs, insurer, saved stance, exact passage and original-answer offsets

  • Recorded source URLs

    source-urls.csv

    One row per recorded answer, website and URL association.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, website, URL, source records and presence in the captured answer text

  • Matched consumer platform membership

    platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, consumer and platform; 22 identical questions per platform

  • Matched regional platform membership

    regional-platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question regional platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, region and platform; 31 identical questions per platform

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

ChatGPT · New Zealand

What is the best way to compare insurers' limits for expensive individual contents items?

The best way to compare insurers in New Zealand is to look at the maximum amount payable for each expensive individual item, rather than comparing the total contents sum insured alone.

A contents policy might cover all your belongings up to $100,000, for example, but impose a much lower limit on any one item unless you specifically list it on the policy. This can make a big difference for jewellery, watches, artwork, collectibles, musical instruments, cameras and other high-value possessions.

What to compare between insurers

Comparison point What to check
Unspecified single-item limit The maximum paid for one item that hasn't been separately listed.
Category limit Whether jewellery, watches, artwork, cameras, bikes or collections have special limits.
Total category limit Whether multiple items share one combined cap, even if each item's individual value is below its limit.
Specified-item cover Whether you can list an item individually for its full insured value, and the additional premium.
Where cover applies Whether theft or accidental damage is covered at home, elsewhere in NZ and overseas.
Claim settlement Whether the insurer pays replacement cost, current value or an agreed amount, and what evidence it requires.
Special restrictions Theft conditions, safe requirements, unattended-item exclusions, excesses and any limits that still apply to specified items.

The Insurance Council of New Zealand recommends checking category limits and specifying items whose values exceed them. Contents Insurance Renewal ChecklistContents insurance calculator - Find your sum insured

How much limits can differ

Here are examples from published New Zealand insurer information. They illustrate why comparing policy wording matters; they are not a complete market ranking.

Published limits shown in the sources below; check the current policy wording and schedule before buying.

Insurer / policy example Relevant limit
State Essentials $2,500 per unspecified jewellery item or watch; $10,000 per artwork item. Contents Essentials Insurance Policy Wording Polic
BNZ contents $3,000 per unspecified jewellery item or watch; $10,000 per artwork item. Unless the item is shown as a specified item, the most we pay for certain types of contents for an event is set out below.
AA Insurance contents Adjustable event limits of $5,000 for jewellery and $10,000 for works of art under its published standard contents information. What items do I need to specify on my contents policy?
NZI Distinction Up to $100,000 per artwork item and $100,000 in total for unspecified jewellery and watches, subject to policy terms. Distinction Contents InsuranceDistinction Contents Insurance / Policy wording

Notice that the limits are not always measured the same way: one might apply per item, another to a category across an event, and another to a specific premium policy tier. Don't compare those numbers without checking what each one means.

The most useful way to do the comparison

Create a spreadsheet using your actual expensive possessions. For each insurer, record both the automatic limit and the cost of specifying the item.

Item Replacement value Insurer A limit Insurer B limit
Luxury watch $15,000 $ $
Engagement ring $12,000 $ $
Artwork $20,000 $ $
Camera and lens kit $8,000 $ $
Collectible item $10,000 $ $

For each insurer, ask for two quotes if possible: standard cover and cover with your valuable items specified. Then compare the annual premium against the amount of additional protection, alongside the exclusions and excesses.

One particularly important detail: specifying an item for $15,000 does not automatically mean every loss will result in a $15,000 payout. The policy's settlement basis, excess, conditions and any applicable special limits still matter.

Where to get reliable information

My recommendation: compare the limits in the actual policy documents, not just comparison websites or headline cover amounts. If you have several particularly expensive individual items, pay special attention to the maximum per item, the combined cap for the category and whether those limits still apply when an item is outside your home.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 11 October 2026

Gemini · New Zealand

What is the best way to compare insurers' limits for expensive individual contents items?

Comparing insurers' limits for expensive individual contents items (such as jewellery, watches, high-end cameras, artwork, and e-bikes) requires looking past the general "sum insured" and examining specific policy wordings and maximum payout caps.

The most effective ways to compare and manage these limits in New Zealand include:

1. Compare Unspecified Item Caps (Standard Limits)

Most standard contents policies automatically cover general belongings up to a total sum insured, but they enforce strict caps per item or category if left unspecified.

  • Check the sub-limits: Review how different insurers cap common high-value categories (e.g., standard policies might cap unspecified jewellery, bicycles, or cameras at $2,000 to $3,000 per item).
  • Look at category aggregates: Some insurers also apply a total combined ceiling for a category per event—such as a maximum aggregate payout for all unspecified jewellery lost in a single burglary.

2. Evaluate "Specified Item" Flexibility and Costs

If an item exceeds the standard policy limit, you must list it as a specified item on your policy schedule. When comparing insurers for specified items, look at:

  • Valuation requirements: Find out whether the insurer requires a formal valuation certificate, a recent receipt, or photos to list the item.
  • Premium impacts: Compare how much extra premium is charged per dollar of value for adding high-end items.
  • Excess application: Check whether a claim on a specified item incurs a standard excess or a special higher excess.

3. Review "Anywhere in New Zealand" or Worldwide Cover

Expensive individual items (like engagement rings, laptops, or cameras) are often worn or carried outside the home.

  • Compare whether base policies cover items only inside the home or if they include automatic or optional "away from home" cover across New Zealand (and internationally for brief travel).
  • Check if specified items maintain their full insured value when taken out of the house, or if sub-limits apply to items lost or stolen away from the property.

4. Build a Side-by-Side Comparison Matrix

To make an objective choice, pull Product Disclosure Statements (PDS) or policy wordings from major providers (such as AA Insurance, AMI, State, Tower, or NZI) and build a quick comparison table:

Feature / Item Category Insurer A (e.g., State) Insurer B (e.g., Tower) Insurer C (e.g., AMI)
Unspecified Bicycle Limit e.g., $2,000 per item e.g., $3,000 per item Check PDS
Unspecified Jewellery Cap Check PDS Check PDS Check PDS
Specified Item Process Valuation required > $5k Receipt required > $2k Check PDS
Accidental Damage Included? Optional / Standard Optional / Standard Check PDS

Would you like help listing specific item categories you own to see how standard New Zealand insurer limits typically apply to them?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 11 October 2026

AI Overviews · New Zealand

What is the best way to compare insurers' limits for expensive individual contents items?

AI Overview

The best way to compare contents insurance limits for expensive individual items in New Zealand is to pull the policy wordings or Product Disclosure Statements (PDS) side-by-side and identify the "unspecified single-item limits" and "special event sub-limits".

Marketing brochures often highlight a generic maximum sum insured, but individual valuable items are strictly governed by hidden caps in the fine print.


Step-by-Step Strategy to Compare Limits

1. Pinpoint the Unspecified Single-Item Limit

Every insurer caps how much they will pay out for a standard, unlisted item.

  • The baseline: Under standard policies, this typically sits between $1,000 and $5,000 per item. For instance, a basic policy might cap any single item at $1,000, while a premium tier might push that to $5,000 or $10,000.

  • The comparison: Look for the "Single Item Limit" section in the definitions or policy limits table to see what you get automatically without listing anything.

2. Check the Category "Special Limits" (Sub-Limits)

Even if an item is under the general single-item limit, insurers impose tighter "sub-limits" on specific high-risk categories. You must compare these category caps side-by-side, as they vary drastically between providers:

  • Jewellery & Watches: Unspecified jewellery is usually capped between $1,000 and $3,000 per item , often with a total event limit (e.g., $15,000 max for all jewellery lost in one burglary).

  • Bicycles & Sports Equipment: Standard policies heavily restrict e-bikes and high-end road bikes (often capping them at $2,000).

  • Electronics & Mobile Phones: Mobile phones regularly have distinct, lower caps (e.g., $500 to $1,000) compared to general electronics.

  • Collections & Fine Art: Standard limits for stamp collections, memorabilia, or original paintings are often restricted to around $1,500 to $3,000 per event.

3. Evaluate the "Specified Item" Process and Fees

If your item is worth more than the standard or category limits, you will need to "specify" (schedule) it on the policy. When comparing insurers, look at how they handle this:

  • Premium loading: Ask or check online if adding a $10,000 engagement ring drastically increases the premium. Some insurers include a higher threshold of specified items for free on premium tiers, while others charge per item.

  • Valuation rules: Check the wording for how often you must provide a professional appraisal. Some NZ insurers require an independent valuation less than 2 years old at the time of the policy start, which adds to your out-of-pocket costs.

  • Total Sum Insured structure: Clarify whether a specified item is covered inside your total sum insured or in addition to it.

4. Compare "Away from Home" Coverage

Expensive items like cameras, laptops, and watches leave the house.

  • Ensure you compare whether the item limit applies anywhere in New Zealand.

  • Some basic policies drop individual item limits significantly—or remove accidental loss entirely—the moment the item leaves your physical property boundary.


Core Comparison Overview

Feature to Check What to Look For Why it Matters
Unspecified Limit General cap per item (e.g., $2,000 vs $5,000) Saves you from having to list mid-tier valuables individually.
Category Sub-limits Specific caps on Jewellery, Bikes, Art, and Phones A policy might have a great general limit but a terrible $1,000 jewellery restriction.
Replacement Type "New for Old" vs "Indemnity Value" (Depreciated) Essential for electronics and clothing, which drop in value quickly.
Worldwide / NZ Cover Cover limits for items taken outside the home Protects mobile items (watches, rings, laptops) from accidental loss while out.

Summary Action Plan

Don't rely strictly on online quote aggregators, as they rarely show item sub-limits clearly. Go directly to the insurers' websites, download the Policy Wording PDF , and use Ctrl + F to search for keywords like "Special Limits" , "Sub-limits" , or "Maximum limits" to build your comparison spreadsheet.


To help give you the most accurate advice, could you tell me:

  • What specific types of items are you looking to insure (e.g., jewellery, e-bikes, camera gear, artwork)?

  • Do you know the approximate value of the most expensive single item?

  • Are you looking for a standard policy or a premium tier product?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026

Google AI Mode · New Zealand

What is the best way to compare insurers' limits for expensive individual contents items?

When comparing how New Zealand insurers handle and limit coverage for expensive individual contents items (such as high-end jewelry, art, watches, or high-performance cameras), a standard overall sum insured is not enough. Most policies enforce a single article limit (or unspecified valuable limit) above which an item won't be fully covered unless specifically declared.

The best ways to compare and evaluate these limits across different NZ insurers include:

  • Reviewing Policy Wordings (PW): Directly download and check the "Policy Wording" or "Beneath the Surface" document for each insurer (e.g., AA, AMI, State, Tower, Trade Me Insurance). Look specifically for sections titled "Unspecified Valuables," "Collections," or "Single Item Limits."

  • Comparing Specified vs. Unspecified Caps: Note the maximum dollar amount an insurer pays out for a single item without it being itemized. For example, one insurer might cap unspecified jewelry at $2,000 per item, while another might cap it at $5,000.

  • Checking Specification Requirements and Costs: Compare whether listing an item (specifying it) requires a valuation certificate (like a jeweler's appraisal) and whether doing so increases your premium or adds a specialized excess for that specific item.

  • Utilizing Independent Consumer Guides: Reference comparison resources like MoneyHub NZ to see broad overviews of how different local providers structure their general contents benefits and exclusions.

  • Requesting Schedule Summaries via Brokers or Comparison Sites: If using an insurance broker or a detailed quote comparison matrix, explicitly ask for a breakdown of sub-limits for high-value categories rather than just comparing the baseline annual premium and total sum insured.

If you'd like, let me know:

  • What specific types of expensive items you are trying to cover (e.g., jewelry, fine art, musical instruments, high-end tech)
  • Whether you prefer to list items individually or want high automatic unspecified limits

I can give you more tailored advice on what to look out for in policy wordings.

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026