Evidence · Home and contents insurance

Every question, every answer, every source

Explore all 372 home and contents insurance questions and the 1,476 answers saved on 11 October 2026. Read the original responses and download the tables behind the study’s comparisons, sources, sentiment and factual checks.

questions
372
answers saved, of 1488 planned
1476
consumer situations
12
named regions
16
AI platforms
4

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question went to the four AI platforms. All were collected with a New Zealand setting. Open a question to read every captured answer in full.

Showing 20 of 372 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its exact saved wording.

    Question ID, source references, question, consumer situation, named regions, question group and collection setting

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per captured answer, with its full text.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, collection setting, consumer situation, named regions and full answer

  • Sources by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, assistant, collection setting, website and publisher type

  • Checks against primary sources

    checks.csv

    One row per stated assertion checked, for one platform.

    Check, question and answer IDs, assistant, exact passage, verdict, primary-source finding, URL and date

  • Consumer recommendation coding

    consumer-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a consumer-selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, counted recommendation, exact passage and conditions

  • Consumer selection membership

    consumer-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched consumer-selection comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; twelve home and twelve contents selection questions, with missing captures preserved

  • Ongoing support coding

    support-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed named-provider role in an eligible support answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, support-preference decision and exact passage

  • Ongoing support membership

    support-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the actual consumer-support group.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; acquisition validation is excluded

  • Regional recommendation coding

    regional-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a region-named selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform, provider, recommendation decision and exact passage

  • Regional selection membership

    regional-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched regional comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform and equal-comparison membership; four home and three contents platform answers per region

  • Insurer sentiment

    insurer-sentiment.csv

    One row per unique saved claim about an insurer in a selection answer.

    Claim, question and answer IDs, insurer, saved stance, exact passage and original-answer offsets

  • Recorded source URLs

    source-urls.csv

    One row per recorded answer, website and URL association.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, website, URL, source records and presence in the captured answer text

  • Matched consumer platform membership

    platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, consumer and platform; 22 identical questions per platform

  • Matched regional platform membership

    regional-platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question regional platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, region and platform; 31 identical questions per platform

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

ChatGPT · New Zealand

My bach in the Coromandel was empty when the storm hit. The insurer says the claim might not be covered. What can I do?

I'm sorry — that's a stressful situation, especially when your bach is supposed to be a place to get away from it all. The fact that your Coromandel bach was empty when the storm hit does not automatically mean your insurance claim is excluded. What matters is the wording of your policy, the cause of the damage, how long the property was unoccupied, and whether you've complied with any relevant policy conditions.

In New Zealand, there are practical steps you can take to challenge an insurer's position, even if it says the claim might not be covered.

What to do first

  1. Get the insurer's position in writing. Ask whether the claim has actually been declined or whether cover is still being investigated. Request the precise policy clauses they are relying on and copies of any assessor's, engineer's or other expert reports. New Zealand's Natural Hazards Commission also says claimants should receive a clear explanation and relevant specialist reports when a claim isn't accepted. Claims process :: Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake
  2. Protect the bach and document the damage. Take photos and videos, keep receipts for emergency repairs, and take reasonable steps to prevent further damage. Keep damaged materials where practical, and check with the insurer before authorising major permanent repairs.
  3. Find the exact policy that applied on the storm date. Check whether it describes the property as a holiday home, second home or unoccupied property. Look for vacancy conditions, maintenance exclusions, storm and flood cover, and any excesses or special limits.
  4. Challenge the decision if you disagree. Make a formal complaint through the insurer's internal complaints process. Explain why you believe the policy covers the loss and what outcome you want. You don't have to wait for a final rejection to ask questions or raise concerns.

Does an empty bach affect storm cover?

It can, but it depends on the wording of your policy and the facts.

  • The bach was empty for a normal period between visits: You may have a stronger argument if it was insured as a holiday home and you complied with its conditions.
  • The insurer says it was unoccupied for too long: Check the exact number of days specified in the policy, whether notification was required, and whether any breach actually affects the loss.
  • The damage was caused by wind, rain or flooding: These can be treated differently under policy terms. For example, direct wind damage to a roof and water entering through a pre-existing defect may be assessed differently.
  • The insurer alleges poor maintenance or pre-existing damage: Ask for evidence showing what caused the damage and how the exclusion applies. Don't assume that an allegation alone settles the issue.

The key question is not simply whether anyone was at the bach during the storm. It's whether the loss falls within your cover and whether the insurer has a valid contractual reason to exclude it.

Get independent help with the claim

One particularly useful option is the government-funded New Zealand Claims Resolution Service (NZCRS).

New Zealand Claims Resolution Service

Free, independent support

It helps homeowners with residential insurance claims arising from natural disasters, including storm and flood events. Depending on your circumstances, it can provide case management and access to legal and engineering advice. You can contact it while your claim is still being assessed. Who can access the NZCRSOur services

0508 624 327

Monday–Friday, 8:30 am–4:30 pm

Visit the NZCRS website

If the insurer ultimately declines your claim, you can also complain to its independent dispute resolution scheme. Depending on the insurer, this may be the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme or Financial Services Complaints Limited. These services are free for eligible consumers. Making a complaint about your financial service providerInsurance & Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme

If the storm caused damage to insured residential buildings or land, there may also be a separate question about cover through the Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake (formerly EQC). Eligibility depends on the type of damage and applicable cover; it does not mean all storm damage is covered. Where you can get support in an emergency » National Emergency Management AgencyClaims process :: Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake

A message you can send to your insurer

Email

Subject
: Request for written clarification of storm damage claim

Dear Claims Team,

I am writing regarding my insurance claim for storm damage to my bach in the Coromandel.

The property was unoccupied when the storm occurred. I understand you have raised concerns about whether the claim is covered.

Please provide:

  • The specific policy clauses you believe may exclude or limit cover.
  • Confirmation of whether the claim is still under assessment or has been declined.
  • Copies of any assessor's reports or other evidence relied upon.
  • An explanation of how the property's unoccupied status affects cover under my policy.
  • Details of any further information or evidence you require from me.

I reserve my position on cover pending receipt of this information. If you decide to decline any part of the claim, please provide your reasons in writing and explain how I can make a formal complaint.

I would appreciate your written response so I can properly understand and respond to your concerns.

Kind regards,

[Your name]

Let’s work out how strong your case might be

The most important detail is why the insurer says the claim might not be covered.

What reason have they given you so far?

With those details, I can help you identify the policy issues to investigate and the strongest next steps to take with your insurer.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 11 October 2026

Gemini · New Zealand

My bach in the Coromandel was empty when the storm hit. The insurer says the claim might not be covered. What can I do?

Having an insurer raise concerns about a claim because a holiday home (bach) was empty during a storm is a stressful situation, but it is not the final word. Insurers sometimes look closely at unoccupancy clauses—particularly if a property has been left vacant for an extended period (often defined in policies as 60 consecutive days or more)—to see if it impacts maintenance or increases the risk of damage going unnoticed.

Here are the concrete steps you can take in New Zealand to challenge a potential declination or keep your claim moving forward:

1. Request the Exact Policy Clause in Writing

  • Action: Ask your insurer to explicitly identify the clause, exclusion, or unoccupancy condition they are relying on to question your claim, and demand this reasoning in writing.
  • Next Step: Review your specific policy wording (specifically look for sections on "unoccupancy," "vacant properties," or "holiday homes") to see what conditions actually apply to your policy and whether the timeframe specified matches your actual timeline.

2. Gather Evidence to Counter "Unoccupancy" Arguments

  • Action: Compile timeline evidence proving when the bach was last visited, maintained, or checked prior to the storm.
  • Next Step: Collect toll records (like AT HOP or road toll accounts if you drove through the Coromandel), receipts from local Coromandel shops, power/water usage data showing activity, or statements from neighbours/local caretakers who keep an eye on the property. Proving the property wasn't abandoned indefinitely weakens broad unoccupancy assumptions.

3. Differentiate Between General Damage and Maintenance Issues

  • Action: Establish whether the storm damage (e.g., roof lifting off, tree falling, structural flooding) was caused directly by the sudden, violent weather event rather than long-term wear and tear or neglect.
  • Next Step: Take comprehensive photos and videos of the damage immediately. If needed, engage an independent professional (such as a local builder or structural engineer) to write a brief report confirming that the damage was a direct result of the storm.

4. Escalate Through the Insurer’s Internal Dispute Process

  • Action: If the insurer initially indicates they will decline the claim, formally lodge a complaint through their Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) process.
  • Next Step: Clearly outline why you disagree with their interpretation of the unoccupancy clause and provide your supporting evidence. By law, New Zealand insurers must have an internal complaints process.

5. Leverage Free External Dispute Resolution Schemes

  • Action: If the insurer stands by their decision or you reach a deadlock (or they don't resolve the complaint within two months), take your case to the relevant independent dispute resolution scheme for free.
    • Check if your insurer is a member of the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) scheme or Financial Services Complaints Limited (FSCL).
    • You can also contact the New Zealand Claims Resolution Service (NZCRS), a government-backed service that provides free, independent advice and case management for homeowners dealing with complex insurance claims after natural events.

Are you currently dealing with a formal declination letter from your insurer, or are they still investigating the claim?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 11 October 2026

AI Overviews · New Zealand

My bach in the Coromandel was empty when the storm hit. The insurer says the claim might not be covered. What can I do?

AI Overview

It is incredibly stressful to face potential damage to your property only to have your insurance company push back, especially when dealing with the aftermath of a major Coromandel storm.

In New Zealand, the most common reason insurers question claims on an empty bach is an unoccupancy clause. Most residential policies state that if a home is left empty for more than a set period (typically 60 consecutive days), standard cover is reduced or suspended unless you notified them in advance.

If your insurer is indicating your claim might not be covered, you should take the following strategic steps immediately to protect your position:

1. Challenge the "Unoccupancy" Timeline

If they are invoking an unoccupancy clause, calculate your exact dates.

  • Look for evidence proving the bach was visited or stayed in within the policy's specified limit (e.g., 60 days).

  • Gather proof of recent occupancy, such as power/water usage bills , text messages discussing a recent trip, receipts from Coromandel petrol stations or local supermarkets, or logs from a smart lock/security system. If someone stayed there or checked on it within the window, the clause may not apply.

2. Document and Mitigate the Damage

Do not let the insurer claim that "subsequent" or "gradual" damage occurred because the property was left unattended after the storm.

  • Take photos and videos immediately: Document everything extensively before touching or moving anything.

  • Prevent further loss: You have a legal duty to mitigate further damage. If the roof is leaking, arrange for a temporary tarp. Keep all receipts for urgent work, but do not undertake major permanent structural repairs without the insurer's written consent.

  • Distinguish land vs. building damage: If a landslide or storm surge affected your property, remember that your private insurer covers the bach itself, but the Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake (NHC) provides cover for the land under and immediately around your home.

3. Request a Formal Decision in Writing

Insurers sometimes verbally discourage policyholders before a formal assessment is even complete.

  • Insist that they process your claim and provide a formal letter of acceptance or decline.

  • If they decline it, they must legally specify the exact policy exclusion or clause they are relying on. Under the Fair Insurance Code, insurers must acknowledge your claim within 5 business days and make a decision within 10 business days once they have all necessary information.

4. Access Free, Independent NZ Support

You do not have to fight the insurer alone. There are dedicated, free resources available to New Zealanders navigating complex disaster claims:

  • New Zealand Claims Resolution Service (NZCRS): This is a free, independent government-funded service specifically set up to help homeowners navigate difficult insurance claims after natural disasters. They can provide you with a case manager, look over your policy, and advocate on your behalf. You can contact them via the NZCRS Website or call 0508 624 327.

  • Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO): If your insurer issues a formal letter of decline (or you reach a deadlock), you can escalate the dispute to the IFSO Scheme for an independent, legally binding review.

To help tailor this advice, how long had the bach been empty before the storm, and what specific reason did the insurer give for questioning the cover?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026

Google AI Mode · New Zealand

My bach in the Coromandel was empty when the storm hit. The insurer says the claim might not be covered. What can I do?

It is stressful dealing with an empty bach and a hesitant insurer, especially after a heavy storm in a coastal or regional spot like the Coromandel. Insurers sometimes initially flag "unoccupied" or "vacant" clauses if a property isn't lived in permanently, but that doesn't mean your claim is dead in the water.

Here are the practical steps you can take right now to protect your position and challenge a potential decline:

  1. Request the exact reason in writing
    Ask your insurer to provide their preliminary decision and the specific policy wording or clause they are relying on to suggest the claim might not be covered. Vague phone conversations don't give you a solid basis to push back; you need to see the black-and-white wording regarding unoccupancy definitions.
  2. Check your policy's unoccupancy definition
    Read your specific policy document carefully. Many policies state that a home is considered "unoccupied" only if it is left empty for a continuous period exceeding a specific threshold (often 60 consecutive days, sometimes 90). If your bach was only empty between regular weekend visits or for a shorter timeframe, the unoccupancy clause may not even legally apply.
  3. Gather evidence of weather and timelines
    Compile clear evidence of when the storm hit, local MetService warnings or severe weather reports for the Coromandel area, and proof of when you last visited or checked on the property. Establishing that the damage was a direct result of a sudden, external natural event (storm/flood/wind) rather than gradual wear-and-tear or long-term neglect is crucial.
  4. Invoke the formal internal dispute process (IDR)
    If they officially decline or narrow the claim, do not just accept it. Every regulated insurer in New Zealand has an internal complaints process. Formally lodge a complaint with their internal dispute resolution team or case manager, laying out the facts, your policy interpretation, and why you believe the exclusion shouldn't apply.
  5. Escalate to an external dispute resolution (EDR) scheme
    If the insurer upholds their declination through their internal process (reaching a "deadlock"), you can take your case to a free, independent financial ombudsman service. Depending on which scheme your insurer belongs to, you can approach: [Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ)]
  • The Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme

  • Financial Services Complaints Limited (FSCL)
    These services are entirely free for consumers and issue determinations that are binding on the insurance company if you choose to accept them.

  1. Utilize government support services
    If the event is broad or severe enough, you can check resources or guidance via the New Zealand Residential Advisory Service (NZCRS), which provides independent assistance and mediation support for property insurance disputes. [New Zealand Claims Resolution Service]

If you'd like to share, let me know:

  • How long the bach was empty before the storm hit
  • What specific reason or clause the insurer mentioned on the call

I can help you look closer at how those clauses usually apply.

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026