Evidence · Home and contents insurance

Every question, every answer, every source

Explore all 372 home and contents insurance questions and the 1,476 answers saved on 11 October 2026. Read the original responses and download the tables behind the study’s comparisons, sources, sentiment and factual checks.

questions
372
answers saved, of 1488 planned
1476
consumer situations
12
named regions
16
AI platforms
4

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question went to the four AI platforms. All were collected with a New Zealand setting. Open a question to read every captured answer in full.

Showing 20 of 372 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its exact saved wording.

    Question ID, source references, question, consumer situation, named regions, question group and collection setting

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per captured answer, with its full text.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, collection setting, consumer situation, named regions and full answer

  • Sources by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, assistant, collection setting, website and publisher type

  • Checks against primary sources

    checks.csv

    One row per stated assertion checked, for one platform.

    Check, question and answer IDs, assistant, exact passage, verdict, primary-source finding, URL and date

  • Consumer recommendation coding

    consumer-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a consumer-selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, counted recommendation, exact passage and conditions

  • Consumer selection membership

    consumer-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched consumer-selection comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; twelve home and twelve contents selection questions, with missing captures preserved

  • Ongoing support coding

    support-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed named-provider role in an eligible support answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, support-preference decision and exact passage

  • Ongoing support membership

    support-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the actual consumer-support group.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; acquisition validation is excluded

  • Regional recommendation coding

    regional-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a region-named selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform, provider, recommendation decision and exact passage

  • Regional selection membership

    regional-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched regional comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform and equal-comparison membership; four home and three contents platform answers per region

  • Insurer sentiment

    insurer-sentiment.csv

    One row per unique saved claim about an insurer in a selection answer.

    Claim, question and answer IDs, insurer, saved stance, exact passage and original-answer offsets

  • Recorded source URLs

    source-urls.csv

    One row per recorded answer, website and URL association.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, website, URL, source records and presence in the captured answer text

  • Matched consumer platform membership

    platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, consumer and platform; 22 identical questions per platform

  • Matched regional platform membership

    regional-platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question regional platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, region and platform; 31 identical questions per platform

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

ChatGPT · New Zealand

Our fridge was damaged after a power cut, but the contents payout won't buy the same model. Can we ask the insurer to reconsider?

Yes, you can ask your insurer to reconsider the payout. In New Zealand, the key question is usually what your policy promises to pay for — for example, whether your fridge is covered on a replacement basis (a comparable new fridge) or on a present value/indemnity basis (taking age and depreciation into account). Consumer Protection

You could ask your insurer to review the settlement if:

  • The amount offered does not buy a reasonable equivalent replacement (same capacity, features, quality, or specifications).
  • They have used the wrong model or an inferior comparison.
  • The model is discontinued and they have not considered the closest equivalent available.
  • Your policy wording supports replacement cover rather than a depreciated cash value. Consumer Protection

When you contact them, it helps to provide:

  • The original fridge’s make, model, age and purchase details (if available).
  • Photos, manuals, receipts, or proof of specifications.
  • Examples of current fridges that are genuine equivalents and their prices.
  • A clear request for a review of the assessment and settlement amount.

You can say something like:

“I would like the settlement reviewed because the amount offered does not appear sufficient to replace the damaged fridge with a comparable model. Please provide the basis used for the valuation and reconsider the settlement in light of the current replacement cost of an equivalent appliance.”

If the insurer declines to change the amount, you can make a formal complaint through their internal complaints process. Consumer Protection NZ notes that if you are unhappy with an insurance claim outcome, you can complain to your insurer and ask for another assessment of whether the decision or payment was reasonable. Consumer Protection If it remains unresolved, your insurer should also be able to tell you which external dispute resolution scheme applies to your policy. Consumer NZ

If you tell me:

  1. your insurer,
  2. the fridge model (or approximate age/specs),
  3. the payout amount, and
  4. what an equivalent replacement costs now,

I can help you assess whether the reconsideration request has a strong basis.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 11 October 2026

Gemini · New Zealand

Our fridge was damaged after a power cut, but the contents payout won't buy the same model. Can we ask the insurer to reconsider?

Yes, you can ask your insurer to reconsider.

Most standard contents insurance policies in New Zealand operate on a replacement value (or "new for old") basis. This means the policy contract is designed to put you back in the same financial position you were in before the loss, which generally means replacing your damaged item with one of the same or similar make, model, and quality.

If the payout they have offered falls short of buying an equivalent model, you have every right to push back.


Key Steps to Take

  • Check your policy wording: Look closely at your certificate of insurance and policy document. Check whether your policy specifies "replacement value" or "indemnity/present-day value" (though most comprehensive contents policies are replacement value). Also check if there are any specific sub-limits or depreciation clauses for appliances.
  • Gather evidence of true replacement costs: Find current retail prices from New Zealand appliance stores (such as Harvey Norman, Noel Leeming, or direct manufacturer sites) for a fridge with equivalent specifications (capacity, dimensions, configuration like bottom-mount or French door, and key features like plumbed ice-makers or inverter motors).
  • Submit a formal reconsideration request: Contact your claims handler, provide the quotes or links for the equivalent model, and explicitly ask them to review the payout so that you can purchase a genuinely comparable appliance. Point out that the current offer does not achieve a like-for-like replacement.

What if they refuse?

If your insurer sticks to their original offer and you cannot reach an agreement, you do not have to leave it there:

  1. Escalate internally: Ask to speak to a team leader or manager within the insurance company's dispute or complaints department.
  2. Contact the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme or Banking Ombudsman: All insurance providers in New Zealand must belong to an approved external dispute resolution scheme. If you cannot resolve the issue with your insurer, you can take your complaint to their respective ombudsman service for a free, independent review.

Would you like help drafting an email or script to send to your insurance company to request this review?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 11 October 2026

AI Overviews · New Zealand

Our fridge was damaged after a power cut, but the contents payout won't buy the same model. Can we ask the insurer to reconsider?

AI Overview

Yes, you can absolutely ask your insurer to reconsider. Under New Zealand insurance standards, how your claim is handled depends on whether your contents policy is for "Replacement Value" (New for Old) or "Present Value" (Market/Indemnity Value). If you have replacement cover, the insurer is generally required to provide a payout or a replacement that matches the nearest available equivalent in functionality, specifications, and quality at today's retail prices.

If the current cash payout does not cover the cost of buying that equivalent model in New Zealand, you have a strong basis to challenge it.

How to ask your insurer to reconsider

  1. Check your policy wording: Look at your policy schedule to confirm if major whiteware/appliances are covered under "Replacement Value". Note if there are specific limits or depreciation rules applied to appliances of a certain age.

  2. Gather local retail evidence: Look up the exact model of your damaged fridge, or its closest modern equivalent if your exact model is no longer sold. Find prices from major New Zealand retailers (e.g., Noel Leeming, Harvey Norman, JB Hi-Fi).

  3. Submit a formal request: Send the retail pricing evidence to your claims handler. Explicitly state that under the "like-for-like" or "replacement" clause of your policy, the current settlement is insufficient to return you to the position you are entitled to.

  4. Beware of supplier discounts: Insurers often calculate cash settlements based on the wholesale discounts they get from their own preferred suppliers rather than retail store prices. If they insist on a lower payout based on this, you can ask them to physically source and deliver the replacement fridge to you through their supplier network instead of giving you the cash.

If the insurer refuses to budge

If you cannot reach an agreement directly with your claims handler, follow these steps:

  • Lodge a formal internal complaint: Ask for your file to be escalated to the insurer's internal dispute resolution team.

  • Contact an external dispute scheme: If you reach a deadlock (or 2 months pass without resolution), you can take your case to the external independent scheme your insurer belongs to—either the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) or Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL). These services are free for consumers and can legally compel insurers to fix unfair payouts.

To help tailor this advice, could you share what brand and model your fridge is, how old it is , and whether your policy is "New for Old" or "Present Value"?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026

Google AI Mode · New Zealand

Our fridge was damaged after a power cut, but the contents payout won't buy the same model. Can we ask the insurer to reconsider?

Yes, you can absolutely ask your insurer to reconsider the payout. Under New Zealand insurance standards (guided by the Insurance Council of New Zealand guidelines), a "replacement cover" policy typically entitles you to a new item of equivalent quality, value, and functionality to the one that was damaged.

If the payout falls short of buying a comparable fridge with similar features, capacity, and build quality, it may not meet that standard.

Steps to ask for a reconsideration

  • Check your policy wording: Review your schedule to see if you have "new for old" / replacement cover or if an indemnity/market value (depreciated) calculation was applied.

  • Gather evidence: Find current retail prices and model specifications for a fridge that matches the exact size, configuration (e.g., bottom freezer, side-by-side), and key features of your damaged unit.

  • Submit a formal request: Contact your insurer, explain why the current payout is insufficient to restore you to the same functional position, and provide your pricing evidence. [Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ)]

  • Escalate if needed: If the insurer refuses and you remain deadlocked, you can take the complaint through their internal dispute process and eventually to the Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme, a free independent dispute resolution service in New Zealand.

Would you like guidance on how to write a reconsideration request or do you know if your policy is replacement value or indemnity value?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026