Evidence · Home and contents insurance

Every question, every answer, every source

Explore all 372 home and contents insurance questions and the 1,476 answers saved on 11 October 2026. Read the original responses and download the tables behind the study’s comparisons, sources, sentiment and factual checks.

questions
372
answers saved, of 1488 planned
1476
consumer situations
12
named regions
16
AI platforms
4

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question went to the four AI platforms. All were collected with a New Zealand setting. Open a question to read every captured answer in full.

Showing 20 of 372 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its exact saved wording.

    Question ID, source references, question, consumer situation, named regions, question group and collection setting

  • Answers

    answers.csv

    One row per captured answer, with its full text.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, collection setting, consumer situation, named regions and full answer

  • Sources by answer

    sources.csv

    One row per website recorded as a source of an answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, assistant, collection setting, website and publisher type

  • Checks against primary sources

    checks.csv

    One row per stated assertion checked, for one platform.

    Check, question and answer IDs, assistant, exact passage, verdict, primary-source finding, URL and date

  • Consumer recommendation coding

    consumer-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a consumer-selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, counted recommendation, exact passage and conditions

  • Consumer selection membership

    consumer-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched consumer-selection comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; twelve home and twelve contents selection questions, with missing captures preserved

  • Ongoing support coding

    support-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed named-provider role in an eligible support answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, provider, role, support-preference decision and exact passage

  • Ongoing support membership

    support-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the actual consumer-support group.

    Answer ID, question ID, consumer, platform, question group and full text; acquisition validation is excluded

  • Regional recommendation coding

    regional-recommendation-coding.csv

    One row per reviewed provider role in a region-named selection answer.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform, provider, recommendation decision and exact passage

  • Regional selection membership

    regional-selection-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the matched regional comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, named consumer region, platform and equal-comparison membership; four home and three contents platform answers per region

  • Insurer sentiment

    insurer-sentiment.csv

    One row per unique saved claim about an insurer in a selection answer.

    Claim, question and answer IDs, insurer, saved stance, exact passage and original-answer offsets

  • Recorded source URLs

    source-urls.csv

    One row per recorded answer, website and URL association.

    Answer ID, question ID, platform, website, URL, source records and presence in the captured answer text

  • Matched consumer platform membership

    platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, consumer and platform; 22 identical questions per platform

  • Matched regional platform membership

    regional-platform-membership.csv

    One row per answer in the identical-question regional platform comparison.

    Answer ID, question ID, product, region and platform; 31 identical questions per platform

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

ChatGPT · New Zealand

Our belongings were ruined by river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui. The insurer wants to clean some of them, but we want them replaced. What can we do?

I’m sorry you’re dealing with this. After river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui, having your belongings treated as salvageable when you consider them ruined can be frustrating, particularly when they may have been contaminated by floodwater.

In New Zealand, you can challenge your insurer’s decision to clean belongings rather than replace them. However, whether you can insist on replacement will generally depend on your policy wording, the extent of the damage and contamination, and whether cleaning can safely and reasonably restore the items.

Here’s how I’d approach it.

1. You don’t have to accept the insurer’s assessment without question

Your insurer may prefer cleaning because it costs less than replacement. But a proposed cleaning solution should be assessed against the actual damage and the terms of your policy.

Your position is stronger if you can show that:

  • Floodwater contaminated items with sewage, silt, chemicals or other hazardous material.
  • Upholstered furniture, mattresses, soft toys or other porous items cannot be reliably decontaminated.
  • Items remain odorous, stained, structurally damaged or unsafe after a proposed treatment.
  • Cleaning costs are disproportionate to the value of the item, or the item cannot reasonably be restored to its pre-flood condition.
  • The insurer has not provided a credible technical assessment explaining why the items are suitable for cleaning.

Not every item exposed to floodwater necessarily needs replacing. The key is to challenge the proposed remedy for each affected item, based on evidence rather than having to argue that everything must be replaced.

2. Take these steps before agreeing to cleaning

  1. Ask for the insurer’s decision in writing. Request an itemised list showing which belongings they want cleaned, which they will replace, and why they believe each item can be restored.
  2. Ask for the evidence behind their decision. Request the assessor’s report and the proposed cleaning method, including how the contractor will address flood contamination and verify that the item is safe to use.
  3. Photograph and catalogue everything. Record the item, its condition, how high the floodwater reached and any visible contamination, odour or damage. Keep receipts, bank statements and replacement-price estimates where possible. Consumer NZ recommends documenting damage and not feeling pressured to accept the first offer. Home and contents insurance: How to make a claimMaking urgent repairs :: Natural Hazards Commission Toka Tū Ake
  4. Get independent evidence if needed. For disputed items, ask a suitable restoration specialist or other relevant expert to assess whether cleaning is technically appropriate. Check with your insurer first about any assessment costs.
  5. Don't dispose of or authorise irreversible treatment of disputed items without documenting the damage and discussing it with the insurer. Ask them to preserve the evidence and agree on a process for disputed items. Follow any necessary health and safety advice in the meantime.

The Insurance Council of New Zealand advises disposing of fully flooded soft furnishings and other ruined or contaminated items that cannot be properly cleaned, while setting aside items that can be cleaned. This supports making an item-by-item case rather than accepting a blanket decision either way. Disaster Recovery - ICNZRecovery: What to do after a flood » National Emergency Management Agency

3. Check what your contents policy actually promises

Look for the sections headed settling claims, replacement value, repair or replacement, damaged contents and insurer's options.

There is an important distinction:

  • Replacement-value cover: may provide a new equivalent item when the original is damaged beyond repair, subject to your policy.
  • Present-value or indemnity cover: may pay only the item's value immediately before the flood.
  • Repair-or-replace wording: may allow the insurer to choose a reasonable repair where the item can be restored, rather than automatically paying for a new one.

The exact wording matters. Replacement cover does not necessarily mean you can choose a new item whenever you prefer one over a technically adequate repair. Equally, the insurer should explain why its proposed remedy complies with your policy. InsuranceHow to get the best house and contents insurance

4. Make a formal complaint if the insurer won't reconsider

Write to the insurer's complaints team rather than relying only on conversations with your claim handler. Ask for an independent review of the disputed items and a written explanation of the decision against your policy.

If that does not resolve things, you can consider these New Zealand options:

New Zealand Claims Resolution Service (NZCRS)

Provides support with residential property insurance disputes following natural disasters, including advice on dispute resolution and access to mediation. Ask whether your particular contents dispute falls within its assistance.

0508 624 327

nzcrs.govt.nz

Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme

An independent, free complaints service for eligible disputes with participating insurers. Check which external dispute resolution scheme your insurer belongs to and follow its complaints process.

ifso.nz

Consumer NZ explains the insurer's internal complaint process and escalation to an external dispute resolution scheme. The NZCRS also provides guidance on mediation and further options. Home and contents insurance: How to make a claimResolving disputes and claims

5. A message you can send to your insurer

Email

Subject
: Formal complaint – flood-damaged contents and proposed cleaning

Dear Claims Team,

I am writing to formally dispute the proposed cleaning of our belongings damaged by river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui.

We do not consider the proposed cleaning an acceptable resolution for the items in dispute, given the extent of the flood damage and our concerns about contamination, safety, hygiene and whether the items can be restored to their pre-loss condition.

Please provide the following in writing:

  1. An itemised list of all belongings you propose to clean rather than replace.
  2. The assessment and evidence supporting the conclusion that each item can be safely and effectively restored.
  3. Details of the proposed cleaning methods and how successful decontamination and restoration will be verified.
  4. The relevant policy wording explaining your decision to clean rather than replace each item.
  5. Confirmation that the disputed items will not undergo irreversible treatment or be disposed of before we have had a reasonable opportunity to review the evidence and respond.

We request an independent review of the disputed items, taking into account the nature of the floodwater, the materials affected, any contamination risks and the feasibility of restoring the items to their pre-flood condition.

Where items cannot be safely and reasonably restored, we request settlement in accordance with our policy's applicable replacement provisions.

Please treat this as a formal complaint under your internal complaints process and provide a written response explaining your decision and the options available to us if we remain dissatisfied.

We are willing to provide further photographs, an inventory and supporting evidence as required.

Kind regards,

[Your name]
[Claim number]

One important question

What types of belongings does the insurer want to clean rather than replace?

For example, mattresses and couches, clothing and bedding, children's toys, wooden furniture, electrical appliances, or a mixture of these.

The type of belongings makes a significant difference to the strength of your case. If you tell me which items are involved, I can help you work out which are most reasonably challenged for replacement under New Zealand insurance and flood-recovery guidance.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 11 October 2026

Gemini · New Zealand

Our belongings were ruined by river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui. The insurer wants to clean some of them, but we want them replaced. What can we do?

Dealing with flood-damaged belongings in the Manawatū–Whanganui region is deeply stressful, and clashing with your insurance company over cleaning versus replacement is a common battleground.

In New Zealand, insurance policies and industry standards govern what insurers can and cannot require you to accept. Here is a breakdown of your rights and actionable steps you can take:


1. Understand Your Policy Wording (Clean vs. Replace)

  • Contamination Risk: Floodwaters (especially river overflows) are categorized as contaminated or "black/grey water" because they carry sewage, silt, agricultural runoff, and chemical pollutants.
  • Porous vs. Non-Porous Items: Most standard New Zealand contents policies state that items can be repaired or restored only if they can be returned to their pre-loss, sanitary condition safely.
    • Soft/Porous items (such as mattresses, upholstered furniture, rugs, carpets, clothing soaked in raw river silt, children's toys, and insulation) are generally impossible to sanitize fully and are considered a health risk. Industry practice strongly dictates these must be replaced, not cleaned.
    • Hard items (like solid wood furniture, metal goods, or certain plastics) are harder to write off automatically, as insurers will often push to have professional restorers clean and sanitize them.
  • New-for-Old Policies: Check if your policy is a "replacement value" (new-for-old) or "indemnity value" (current market value) policy. If you have standard new-for-old contents insurance, you are entitled to items of a similar condition and quality brand-new if they cannot be properly restored.

2. Practical Steps You Can Take Now

  • Get an Independent Health/Restoration Opinion: Ask a professional, independent flood restoration company or a local health inspector to look at the items. If they provide a written assessment stating that porous items or heavily silt-contaminated goods cannot be safely or hygienically restored to pre-flood condition, hand that evidence directly to your insurer.
  • Document Everything (Crucial): If you haven't already, take clear photographs and videos of every damaged item, making sure to capture the high-water/silt marks. Keep a meticulous list including the brand, age, and estimated replacement cost. Do not throw items out without photographing them unless they pose an immediate health hazard, in which case keep a detailed log and photos of what was discarded.
  • Challenge the Insurer in Writing: Send an email or letter to your claims handler. Explicitly state why you believe cleaning is inadequate. Focus on:
    • Health and safety risks (mould spores, bacteria, and toxic river silt embedded in materials).
    • The reduction in quality, lifespan, or structural integrity an item would suffer even if superficially cleaned.
    • Request that they provide a written guarantee from their cleaning contractor ensuring the items will be completely free of contamination and restored to their exact pre-loss condition, with a warranty on the clean.

3. Escalating the Dispute

If your insurer digs in and insists on cleaning items you believe are ruined or unsafe:

  1. Invoke the Insurer's Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR): Tell them you wish to make a formal complaint. Every insurance company in New Zealand is legally required to have an internal complaints process and a designated disputes team to review deadlock cases.
  2. Escalate to a Free Financial Dispute Resolution Scheme: If the internal complaint doesn't resolve the issue, you can take your case to an independent, government-approved dispute resolution scheme. Depending on which scheme your insurer belongs to, this will be either:
    • The Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme
    • Financial Services Complaints Limited (FSCL)
    • These services are completely free for consumers, and their decisions can be binding on the insurer up to certain policy limits (usually well covering standard contents claims). Insurers take these complaints very seriously.
  3. Local Support: Reach out to MoneyTalks (0800 345 123) or your local Community Law Centre in Manawatū–Whanganui for free guidance and advocacy support while dealing with difficult insurance claims.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 11 October 2026

AI Overviews · New Zealand

Our belongings were ruined by river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui. The insurer wants to clean some of them, but we want them replaced. What can we do?

AI Overview

Dealing with the aftermath of river flooding is incredibly stressful, and it is completely understandable that you want your belongings replaced rather than cleaned. Because river water is heavily contaminated blackwater, you have strong grounds to contest an insurer's decision to clean certain items.

In New Zealand, your right to replacement over cleaning depends entirely on the specific definitions in your contents policy and health and safety standards regarding contaminated floodwater.

Here is what you can do to push back and advocate for your belongings:

1. Argue the "Biohazard and Contamination" Angle

River flooding is not clean water. Under New Zealand health guidelines, floodwaters are considered hazardous and heavily contaminated with sewage, agricultural runoff, and industrial chemicals.

  • Soft and Porous Items: According to the Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ) and the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO), items like mattresses, carpets, upholstered sofas, soft toys, and bedding that have been fully submerged in contaminated floodwater usually cannot be safely sanitized and should be disposed of rather than cleaned.

  • Health Risk: Push back by stating that professional cleaning cannot guarantee the elimination of deep-seated pathogens, presenting an ongoing health risk to your household.

2. Check Your Policy Wording

Locate your specific contents policy document. Look up the clauses for "Basis of Settlement" or "How we settle your claims."

  • Replacement Value vs. Indemnity: Most modern New Zealand contents policies are "Replacement" policies (providing you with a brand-new equivalent item) rather than "Indemnity" policies (which only pay the depreciated value of the old item).

  • The Insurer's Right to Repair/Clean: Almost all policies give the insurer the option to repair, clean, or replace. However, the cleaning or repair must restore the item to an "as new" or acceptable, safe condition. If a professional cleaner cannot certify that the item is entirely safe and restored to its pre-loss state, the insurer must default to replacement.

3. Demand a Professional "Feasibility" Assessment

If the insurer is insisting on cleaning an item you believe is ruined, tell them you want a certified restoration professional to assess it first.

  • Request that the cleaner explicitly guarantees in writing that the item will be 100% free of bacterial contamination and structural degradation after cleaning.

  • Many restoration companies will refuse to provide this guarantee for highly porous items affected by river water, which forces the insurer's hand to replace them.

4. Provide Meticulous Evidence

Do not let the insurer simply gloss over your items.

  • Take Detailed Photos/Videos: Before anything is taken away to be cleaned, document the exact waterlines, silt, and damage on each item.

  • Keep Samples if Demanded: If you must throw away heavily contaminated items for health reasons, take photos first, log them on a spreadsheet, and—if safe—keep a small fabric swatch or serial number tag to prove the quality of the item to your assessor.

5. Escalate the Dispute

If your insurer formally declines to replace the items and you disagree with their assessment, you have free local support networks to help you challenge them:

  • New Zealand Claims Resolution Service (NZCRS): You can contact the NZCRS, a free, government-backed service providing independent advice and case management for homeowners navigating natural disaster claims.

  • Internal Complaints: Request a deadlock letter from your insurance company's internal complaints team.

  • Financial Ombudsmen: Once you have a deadlock letter, you can escalate the case for free to either the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman Scheme (IFSO) or Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL), depending on which scheme your insurer belongs to.

If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • What specific types of items (e.g., electronics, couches, appliances) is the insurer trying to clean?

  • Who is your insurance provider , and do you know if you have a "replacement" or "indemnity" contents policy?

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026

Google AI Mode · New Zealand

Our belongings were ruined by river flooding in Manawatū–Whanganui. The insurer wants to clean some of them, but we want them replaced. What can we do?

Dealing with flood-damaged belongings is stressful, especially when you disagree with your insurer on whether an item can be successfully restored or should be replaced. River floodwater can carry silt, sewage, and chemical contaminants, raising legitimate health and safety concerns about whether cleaned items are truly restored to their pre-loss condition and hygiene standards.

Steps you can take to challenge your insurer's decision:

  1. Review your policy wording carefully: Check your specific policy document to see how "replacement," "repair," and "indemnity" or "restoration" are defined. Look closely at whether the policy gives the insurer the right to elect to repair/clean versus replace, and what standards of quality or functionality they must meet.
  2. Request an independent professional opinion: If items are porous (like mattresses, upholstered furniture, soft toys, or heavily contaminated electronics/wood), obtain a written assessment or health/safety statement from an independent restoration expert, cleaner, or environmental health professional explaining why cleaning is inappropriate or leaves residual contamination/risk.
  3. Raise a formal dispute with the insurer: Contact your insurer's claims manager or dedicated internal disputes team in writing. State clearly why cleaning is unacceptable for the specific items (e.g., health risks from river silt/contaminants) and request a written explanation citing the exact policy clauses they are relying on.
  4. Escalate to an external dispute resolution (EDR) scheme: If your insurer refuses to budge and reaches a deadlock, you can take your complaint to their approved independent dispute resolution scheme. Check whether your insurer belongs to the Insurance & Financial Services Ombudsman (IFSO) Scheme or Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL). These services are free for consumers, independent, and binding on the insurer if you accept their final decision.

If you'd like to share:

  • What kinds of items are in dispute (e.g., furniture, electronics, clothing)
  • Whether your policy is sum insured or full replacement

I can give you more targeted arguments to use with your insurer.

Ask anything

Captured 11 October 2026