Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

2026 New Zealand election: Grocery prices and household bills

The biggest divide in the 2026 election is how much government intervention is needed to make life more affordable.

Broadly, the parties are offering three competing approaches:

  1. National and ACT: Encourage competition, reduce regulatory barriers and focus on economic growth rather than direct government intervention.
  2. Labour: Crack down on powerful companies charging excessive prices, make supermarket wholesale supply fairer and reduce everyday household costs.
  3. The Greens, NZ First and Te Pāti Māori: More substantial structural changes to the grocery sector, including breaking up supermarket businesses, public ownership or community and Māori-owned alternatives.

Groceries are particularly important because Foodstuffs (which operates PAK'nSAVE, New World and Four Square) and Woolworths dominate the supermarket market.

Here is how the main parties compare, based on their published 2026 election policies. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorGroceryElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

1. Grocery prices: what each party proposes

Party Main grocery proposal
National Separate PAK'nSAVE from New World and Four Square, subject to a Commerce Commission assessment. This would create three competing nationwide supermarket groups, including Woolworths.
Labour Separate supermarket wholesale operations from retail operations, giving independent grocers fairer access to stock. Ban excessive pricing and unfair supplier fees.
Green Party Establish KiwiMart, a publicly owned supermarket chain, by acquiring 120 stores and two distribution centres from the existing supermarket groups. Also ban excessive supermarket pricing.
NZ First Split Foodstuffs into two competing cooperatives: one for PAK'nSAVE and another for New World and Four Square.
ACT Make it faster and easier to establish new supermarkets, reduce consenting delays and remove barriers to overseas competition. Opposes forced supermarket break-ups.
Te Pāti Māori Support Māori-owned supermarket chains and local food businesses, with a $3.1 billion Kai Sovereignty package and food assistance for lower-income households.
Opportunity Has not published a specific supermarket or grocery policy in the Retail NZ policy tracker.

Sources: Consumer NZ's party-by-party comparison and Retail NZ's election policy tracker. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorGrocery

The important differences

There are four particularly different ideas here:

  • National and NZ First: Break up Foodstuffs to create stronger competition between its supermarket brands.
  • Labour: Change the way supermarkets buy and distribute groceries, so smaller competitors can challenge them.
  • Greens: Create a publicly owned supermarket competitor rather than relying entirely on private businesses.
  • ACT: Don't break up existing businesses; make it easier for new competitors to enter the market.

One important distinction: National's proposed split is conditional on the Commerce Commission finding it would benefit consumers. NZ First's proposal is a more direct commitment to restructuring Foodstuffs. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorGrocery

2. Household bills: power, fuel, transport and tax

Groceries aren't the only cost-of-living issue. Electricity, petrol, transport, healthcare and housing also feature prominently.

Party Main approach to household bills
National Keep taxes low, control government spending, encourage economic growth and increase electricity supply. Its Home Energy Fund supports household electrification and reducing power bills.
Labour Direct cost relief through a fuel-tax freeze, public transport fare caps, solar loans, free GP visits and action against excessive prices.
Greens Greater public investment, renewable energy, free or cheaper essential services and stronger government intervention in markets.
ACT Lower taxes, smaller government, deregulation and greater private-sector competition, rather than expanding government-funded services.
NZ First Intervene more directly in concentrated industries, including its proposed restructuring of electricity companies, alongside household tax and food affordability measures.
Te Pāti Māori Reduce the cost of essentials through GST removal on food, income-tax changes and greater investment in whānau services and Māori economic ownership.
Opportunity Tax restructuring, including income-tax cuts funded through a land-value tax, alongside expanded public services.

Cost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 20262026 Election PolicyThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

Specific policies worth knowing

Labour – direct relief

Labour has one of the most detailed household cost-relief packages:

  • Freeze fuel tax for three years.
  • Cap weekly public transport fares at $20 in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, and $10 elsewhere.
  • Offer low-interest government-backed solar loans, with up to $3,000 additional assistance for eligible lower- and middle-income households.
  • Make excessive pricing of groceries, electricity and fuel illegal.
  • Introduce three free GP visits annually and remove the $5 prescription charge.
  • Reduce eligible student loan balances by 10%.

Labour estimates its SolarSaver scheme could save an average household around $1,000 annually on electricity. Labour's Cost of Living PlanLabour's Cost of Living Plan

National – competition, supply and lower taxes

National's argument is that sustainable affordability comes from a stronger economy, more investment and less government spending.

Its electricity policies include:

  • Increasing electricity generation and supply.
  • Encouraging investment in renewable generation and infrastructure.
  • Supporting household solar panels, batteries and electrification through its Home Energy Fund.
  • Keeping taxes unchanged and targeting a return to budget surplus in 2028/29.

2026 Election PolicyPower Prices for 2026

ACT – tax reductions and less regulation

ACT argues that government spending, regulation and taxation contribute to the cost-of-living problem.

Its approach includes:

  • Reducing income-tax rates.
  • Reducing the size of government.
  • Making it easier for businesses to compete.
  • Removing regulatory barriers to new supermarkets and electricity investment.

Its underlying argument is that businesses competing for customers will ultimately deliver better prices. Cost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

Greens – public ownership and stronger intervention

The Greens favour a more substantial role for government in essential services and markets.

Their approach includes:

  • Establishing KiwiMart as a publicly owned supermarket chain.
  • Stronger controls against excessive grocery prices.
  • Expanding renewable electricity and public investment in energy.
  • More affordable essential services and support for households experiencing food insecurity.

Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesEnergy Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

NZ First – restructuring concentrated industries

NZ First is particularly notable because it combines traditionally interventionist policies with other more conservative economic positions.

Its proposals include:

  • Splitting Foodstuffs into two competing supermarket cooperatives.
  • Splitting the major electricity generator-retailers (gentailers) to encourage competition.
  • Removing GST from basic food.
  • Tougher enforcement against businesses abusing market power.

Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorCost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026Energy Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

Te Pāti Māori – food sovereignty and tax changes

Its approach focuses on making food more affordable while giving Māori communities greater control over food production and distribution.

Its proposals include:

  • Removing GST from food.
  • Supporting Māori-owned supermarkets.
  • A kai tax credit for people earning $60,000 or less, worth up to eight weeks of food a year.
  • Supporting local food producers and community food systems.

Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorCost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

3. What are the biggest differences in practice?

Here is a simplified comparison of the political philosophies behind the policies.

Question Main parties favouring this approach
Should government force supermarket restructuring? National (conditionally), NZ First, Greens
Should government directly compete with supermarkets? Greens
Should supermarket wholesale operations be separated? Labour
Should government make it easier for new supermarkets to open? ACT, National
Should excessive grocery pricing be illegal? Labour, Greens
Should GST be removed from food? NZ First, Te Pāti Māori
Should income taxes be reduced? National, ACT, Opportunity
Should government provide more direct cost-of-living assistance? Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori

4. Will these policies actually make groceries cheaper?

This is probably the most important question for voters.

There are some significant limitations to consider.

Breaking up supermarkets doesn't automatically mean lower prices.

Splitting Foodstuffs could increase competition, but it could also duplicate warehousing, distribution and technology costs. Those extra costs could eventually be passed on to customers.

More competition takes time.

ACT's approach of attracting new supermarket competitors sounds attractive, but establishing a major supermarket chain requires substantial investment, suppliers, distribution infrastructure and suitable sites.

Price controls have enforcement challenges.

Labour and the Greens want to prevent excessive pricing. However, distinguishing genuinely excessive profits from legitimate costs, freight increases and supply disruptions is complicated.

Removing GST from food doesn't guarantee the full saving reaches consumers.

The effectiveness of GST removal depends on how retailers adjust their prices and how the policy is designed.

Consumer NZ has highlighted these trade-offs in its detailed assessment of the competing supermarket policies. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorGrocery

5. Where the election debate stands

The 2026 general election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, with early voting already underway.

The economic debate is a major feature of the campaign. National is defending its economic management, while Labour is campaigning on immediate cost-of-living relief. Smaller parties are offering potential coalition partners quite different approaches to supermarket and electricity market reform. Early voting opens in New Zealand for November 7 election with no clear frontrunnerThe main parties vying to form New Zealand's next government

For further reading, these are particularly useful:

My overall assessment

The key choice for voters concerned about grocery prices and household bills is between market competition, stronger regulation and direct government intervention.

  • National and ACT are betting that competition, investment and economic growth will deliver lower costs.
  • Labour is betting that stronger regulation and targeted household assistance will produce more immediate improvements.
  • The Greens are proposing a much bigger government role in providing affordable food and essential services.
  • NZ First combines supermarket and electricity restructuring with tax relief.
  • Te Pāti Māori emphasises food sovereignty, community ownership and reducing the tax burden on essentials.

One final caution: these are campaign commitments, not guaranteed outcomes. The policies that actually become law will depend on the election result, coalition negotiations, funding and implementation.

The most useful question to ask of every party is not simply whether it promises cheaper groceries, but how much it expects prices to fall, how quickly, and what evidence supports that prediction.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, the cost of living—specifically soaring grocery prices and household utility bills—has emerged as a central campaign battleground. Different political parties have put forward distinct structural and market-based approaches to tackle household expenses.


1. Supermarket Competition and Grocery Prices

A prominent feature of the 2026 election debate is breaking up the dominant supermarket duopoly (Foodstuffs and Woolworths) to force down checkout prices. Parties approach this market failure through varying structural interventions:

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on structural market enhancement by pushing to split the Foodstuffs cooperative into two separate nationwide entities (effectively separating New World and PAK'nSAVE operations) so that they compete more aggressively against each other on pricing, specials, and range.
  • Labour Party: Proposes opening up the grocery market by separating Woolworths and Foodstuffs’ wholesale arms from their retail operations, targeting unfair supplier contracts, and strengthening the powers of the Commerce Commission and Grocery Commissioner.
  • Green Party: Proposes more direct public intervention by breaking up the duopoly and creating a publicly-owned supermarket chain ("KiwiMart") by requiring Woolworths and Foodstuffs to divest stores and distribution capacity. The Greens also advocate for a legal ban on excessive retail grocery price gouging and a mandatory pricing accuracy code with automatic overcharge compensation.
  • New Zealand First: Also aligns with breaking up dominant corporate structures across uncompetitive sectors to drive down household costs.

2. Household Utilities and Energy Bills

With electricity and power bills placing a heavy strain on households, parties have split approaches regarding energy pricing:

  • National: Offers a multi-point energy plan focused on tackling the drivers of power bills, alongside a Home Energy Fund designed to help households and farms electrify and become more energy-independent to lower long-term costs.
  • Labour: Emphasizes lowering power bills as a core pillar of its cost-of-living manifesto, pointing to increases in electricity costs over recent years and offering targeted relief.
  • The Left / Minor Parties (Greens / NZ First): Propose deeper market redesigns, such as splitting the generation and retail arms of major power companies ("gentailers") to curb perceived overcharging on household power.

3. Broader Household Bills and Cost-of-Living Relief

Beyond the supermarket aisles and power sockets, parties differ on how to ease general household budgets (including health, transport, and family support):

  • National's Approach: Centers on fiscal management with no new taxes, allowing workers to keep more of what they earn. Their strategy relies on growing the economy, curbing government debt, and providing relief through settings like adjusted tax thresholds and KiwiSaver enhancements rather than universal market price caps.
  • Labour's Approach: Focuses on direct cost offsets for everyday essentials. This includes policies targeted at reducing healthcare barriers (such as free or capped GP visits), capping public transport costs, and addressing systemic inflation pressures on food and fuel.
  • The Greens' Approach: Focuses on expanding public support systems, such as permanently funding and expanding free nutritious school lunches (Ka Ora, Ka Ako) to ease household food budgets, alongside income support enhancements.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

For the 2026 New Zealand general election: What are the main competing party approaches to grocery prices and household bills in the 2026 New Zealand election?

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election, the cost of living—specifically high grocery prices and household utility bills—has emerged as a central campaign battleground. While most parties agree that the current supermarket duopoly (Foodstuffs and Woolworths) limits competition and drives up costs, their proposed interventions vary from structural breakups and public ownership to regulatory crackdowns and market-led entry.

According to policy analysis from sources like Consumer NZ, the main competing party approaches break down into several distinct strategies:

1. Structural Breakups and Divestment

  • New Zealand First: Proposes a direct structural split of the Foodstuffs cooperative into two separate, competing entities—dividing Pak'nSave from New World and Four Square—to increase internal market competition.

  • National Party: Proposes a potential split of the Foodstuffs brands to create three distinct nationwide retail competitors (Pak'nSave, New World/Four Square, and Woolworths), but with the qualifier that this action would only proceed if formally recommended by the Commerce Commission, emphasizing that structural decisions should come from the independent regulator rather than cabinet ministers.

  • Green Party: Advocates for a more aggressive forced divestment model, requiring Foodstuffs and Woolworths to sell 120 stores and distribution centres to establish a new, publicly owned supermarket chain called KiwiMart.

2. Wholesale Market Reform and Anti-Profiteering

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reforming wholesale supply. Labour’s policy would legally force major operators to structurally separate their wholesale and retail arms into independent entities (Foodstuffs Wholesale and Woolworths Wholesale). This approach aims to guarantee fair and equal wholesale access for independent grocers and new market entrants, ban "junk fees" on producers, and make "price gouging" illegal across essential goods like food, fuel, and power.

  • Green Party: Supports wholesale improvements alongside its public ownership model and has advanced legislation to ban excessive pricing by dominant supermarket operators, paired with stronger pricing accuracy codes and automatic compensation for overcharged consumers.

3. Regulatory Enforcement and Penalties

  • New Zealand First and Labour: Both advocate giving the Commerce Commission significantly stronger enforcement teeth, faster investigation pathways, and substantially higher penalties for anti-competitive behavior or excessive pricing, with NZ First proposing penalty frameworks modeled after Australia's harsher corporate fines.

  • National and ACT: Generally emphasize market-led solutions and reducing barriers to entry for new international or domestic competitors rather than direct state intervention or price controls, though National supports maintaining and utilizing the powers of the Grocery Commissioner and Commerce Commission.

4. Broader Household Bill Relief

  • Green Party: Has tied its grocery interventions into a broader cost-of-living package. Beyond KiwiMart , the Greens' policy platform targets household bills directly through initiatives like subsidised or free public transport, expanded school lunches, and incentives for residential rooftop solar installations to cut down household electricity bills.
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account