Search studies, brands and more…⌘ KExplore research

Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

Show all 174

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

    174rows

    Download questions (CSV)

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

    789rows

    Download complete answers (CSV)

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

    2,243rows

    Download answers included in each comparison (CSV)

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

    38,131rows

    Download party names found in answers (CSV)

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

    25,974rows

    Download statements and sentiment assessments (CSV)

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

    34,147rows

    Download original saved statement assessments (CSV)

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

    26,571rows

    Download original party assessments (CSV)

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

    379rows

    Download assessments excluded from the sentiment bars (CSV)

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

    789rows

    Download sources recorded with each answer (CSV)

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

    7,600rows

    Download original saved source records (CSV)

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

    789rows

    Download answer review coverage (CSV)

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

    44rows

    Download checks against official sources (CSV)

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

    44rows

    Download statements selected for checking (CSV)

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

    10rows

    Download research findings (CSV)

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

    31rows

    Download what the voting-guidance answers did (CSV)

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

    32rows

    Download what changed for each voter (CSV)

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

    782rows

    Download answers compared across editions (CSV)

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

    21rows

    Download checks across editions (CSV)

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

    510rows

    Download party counts by edition (CSV)

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

    10,200rows

    Download party counts by topic (CSV)

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

    4,879rows

    Download location comparisons by edition (CSV)

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

    7,243rows

    Download websites cited across editions (CSV)

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

    30rows

    Download answer length by assistant (CSV)

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

    5rows

    Download changes between repeated answers (CSV)

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

    20rows

    Download location comparison totals (CSV)

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

    238rows

    Download location comparisons across editions (CSV)

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

    108rows

    Download party-name context checks (CSV)

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

    510rows

    Download sentiment counts by party (CSV)

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

    4,382rows

    Download sources by answer (CSV)

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

    122rows

    Download national and location answers (CSV)

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties are offering meaningful changes for renters, and how would their plans affect rent costs, healthy homes and tenancy security?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, there are meaningful differences between the parties on renters' rights. The biggest divide is over three questions:

  1. Rent affordability: Should government limit how much landlords can increase rent?
  2. Healthy homes: Should rental properties face stronger minimum standards and independent inspections?
  3. Tenancy security: Should landlords be able to end periodic tenancies without giving a reason?

The parties with the most clearly developed proposals across these areas are the Green Party, Labour, and Te Pāti Māori. Opportunity also has proposals focused on improving rental quality. National, ACT, and NZ First take different approaches, with less emphasis on additional private-renter protections.

Here is how they compare, using policies published or reported by 2 November 2026.

  1. Comparing the parties
Party Rent costs Healthy homes Tenancy security
Green 2% annual rent-rise cap; new rent linked to previous rent Stronger Healthy Homes Standards and rental Warrant of Fitness End no-cause evictions; long-term or permanent tenancies
Labour Rent rises limited to once every 12 months; protect social housing income-related rents Landlord duty of care, serious hazard repairs, curtains/blinds End no-cause evictions; longer notice
Te Pāti Māori Universal rent control No comparably detailed new standards identified Repeal no-cause evictions
Opportunity No specific rent cap identified Raise Healthy Homes Standards; insulation and energy improvements Stronger rental standards, but no equivalent no-cause policy identified
National No new private-rent controls announced Home Energy Fund for energy improvements Retain current no-cause eviction rules
ACT No rent cap announced No major new rental-specific standards identified No additional renter protections announced
NZ First No specific private-rent controls identified No major new rental-specific standards identified No additional renter protections announced

Sources:

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties are offering meaningful changes for renters, and how would their plans affect rent costs, healthy homes and tenancy security?

Balancing part-time work, tertiary studies, and renting on a student loan is a tough juggle, and housing costs are a major pressure point for students. In the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties offer contrasting approaches to rental costs, tenancy security, and home standards.

The major parties’ policies directly impact renters in the following ways:

1. Rent Costs and Price Control

  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori:
    • Rent Caps: Both parties propose direct intervention to control rent increases. The Greens have pledged to cap rent rises at a maximum of 2% per year. Te Pāti Māori proposes universal rent control tied to the rate of inflation.
    • Impact: For a student on a tight budget, this would provide predictable housing costs and prevent sharp, unexpected rent hikes. However, critics argue strict rent caps can sometimes disincentivize new rental supply.
  • Labour Party:
    • No Rent Cap: Labour does not support a universal rent cap, but maintains the existing rule limiting rent increases to once every 12 months and promises stronger enforcement.
    • Impact: Provides baseline protection against frequent mid-year increases, though it leaves room for landlords to raise rent annually by market rates.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First:
    • Market-Led Approach: These parties do not propose caps or direct price controls on rents. Instead, their focus is on boosting overall housing supply (through planning reforms, infrastructure, and easing restrictions on building) to naturally moderate prices.
    • Impact: Relies on market forces rather than direct regulation to influence rental pricing.

2. Tenancy Security and Evictions

  • Labour Party:
    • Ban on No-Cause Evictions: Labour has pledged to re-ban "no-cause" terminations and require landlords to provide explicit, valid reasons to end a tenancy. They also propose lengthening notice periods for specific reasons (e.g., 63 days if family is moving in, or 90 days if the property is being sold or renovated).
  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori:
    • Stronger Security & Long-Term Tenancies: The Greens propose ending no-cause evictions and requiring all tenancies to be offered as long-term or permanent options by default. Te Pāti Māori similarly aligns with repealing no-cause evictions.
  • National, ACT, and NZ First:
    • Status Quo: Under the current National-led government settings, no-cause terminations remain permitted (allowing periodic tenancies to be ended with 90 days' notice, or 42 days for specific circumstances like a sale). Parties on the right generally favor maintaining flexibility for property owners to manage their assets.
    • Impact for Students: If you value stability—especially during intensive study blocks or exam periods—parties advocating for the removal of no-cause evictions offer greater peace of mind against sudden displacement.

3. Healthy Homes, Quality, and Energy Efficiency

  • Green Party:
    • High Standards & Warrant of Fitness: The Greens propose introducing an independently certified Rental Warrant of Fitness, strengthening current Healthy Homes Standards, and establishing a national register of all landlords and property managers.
  • Labour Party:
    • Targeted Requirements: Labour’s renter package emphasizes that landlords have a clear duty of care to fix serious hazards and explicitly mandates the provision of proper curtains or blinds under the Healthy Homes framework.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP) & National:
    • Energy Grants and Upgrades: TOP focuses on raising minimum Healthy Homes standards and expanding insulation/heating schemes. National's focus includes targeted funding options like a Home Energy Fund and encouraging solar/electrification in planning, rather than sweeping new tenancy mandates.
    • Impact for Students: Damp, cold flats are a major health and financial hazard (driving up electricity bills). Parties pushing for stricter warranties or tighter insulation/heating enforcement aim to lower living costs and health risks, though tighter rules can sometimes translate into higher baseline rents if landlords pass on upgrade costs.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

  • If your primary concern is immediate cost control and absolute tenancy security: The Green Party and Te Pāti Māori offer the most aggressive interventions (rent caps, permanent tenancy defaults, and ending no-cause evictions).
  • If you want balanced regulation without heavy market intervention: Labour offers a middle-ground package focusing on banning no-cause evictions, mandatory curtains, and strict 12-month-only rent increase intervals, while rejecting rent caps.
  • If you believe supply-side flexibility and property-owner incentives are best: National and ACT focus on broader housing supply and keeping current tenancy rules intact to encourage investment.

How do these priorities weigh against other financial pressures you face as a student, such as student allowance/loan settings or part-time employment costs?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties are offering meaningful changes for renters, and how would their plans affect rent costs, healthy homes and tenancy security?

Navigating part-time work, tertiary studies, and renting in New Zealand is a tight financial balancing act. For the 2026 general election, political parties have put forward distinct visions addressing housing affordability, renter rights, and property quality.

An overview of how the major and minor parties' policies approach rent costs, housing quality (Healthy Homes), and tenancy security highlights key differences for the rental sector:

1. The Labour Party

  • Rent Costs & Pathways: Labour has focused heavily on easing the transition from renting to homeownership for working tenants through a new rent-to-buy scheme for Kāinga Ora and community housing tenants. Under this proposal, working tenants can bank $100 a week toward a 5% deposit for the home they rent. They also proposed lifting the income cap on the First Home Loan scheme from $150,000 to $300,000 to help working individuals enter the property market.

  • Tenancy Security & Quality: Labour’s traditional approach defends and builds upon existing Tenancy Act frameworks and the established Healthy Homes Standards, though their prominent 2026 housing announcements lean more toward first-home buyer accessibility and public housing reinvestment (committing to build additional public houses to offset properties utilized in rent-to-buy pipelines).

2. The Green Party

  • Rent Costs: The Greens traditionally advocate for direct market interventions to help tenants struggling with cost-of-living pressures, such as implementing rent controls or caps on annual rent increases and introducing a comprehensive rental warrant of fitness to address affordability alongside standard of living.

  • Tenancy Security & Quality: The Greens strongly advocate for strengthening renters' rights by removing "no-cause" terminations to provide long-term security so tenants can treat their rental as a stable home without fear of arbitrary eviction. They also push for stricter enforcement of insulation, heating, and ventilation requirements under upgraded Healthy Homes standards.

3. The National Party

  • Rent Costs & Supply: National’s core philosophy centers on increasing overall housing supply through zoning reform, cutting red tape for residential development, and stimulating private rental market availability. Rather than direct price controls on rent, National argues that boosting supply naturally dampens rent inflation over time.

  • Tenancy Security & Quality: National generally favors a balanced regulatory environment for landlords to ensure the private rental market remains economically viable for providers, aiming to avoid rules that they argue might unintentionally disincentivize private landlords from staying in the market and reducing rental availability.

4. ACT New Zealand

  • Rent Costs & Tenancy Security: ACT focuses heavily on pro-landlord market settings, advocating for policies that reduce regulatory burdens on property owners. ACT has historically opposed heavy-handed rental price controls or strict prescriptive tenancy regulations, arguing that flexible rules encourage more private investment in rental properties, which they contend is the best mechanism to control costs via market competition.

Summary Checklist for a Tertiary Renter

  • If you want direct cost controls (rent caps/stabilisation) and stronger stop-gaps against eviction: Left-leaning parties like the Greens center their platforms around direct market interventions, rental warrants of fitness, and ending no-cause terminations.

  • If you are looking at longer-term housing accessibility while working: Parties like Labour offer pathways focusing on asset-building (rent-to-buy initiatives) and first-home buyer support.

  • If you are looking for market-led supply solutions: Centre-right parties like National and ACT focus on supply-side economics and regulatory ease for property providers to indirectly influence rental availability.

You can compare specific electorate candidates and explore granular policy frameworks on Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties are offering meaningful changes for renters, and how would their plans affect rent costs, healthy homes and tenancy security?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties offer distinct approaches to rental costs, healthy homes standards, and tenancy security.

Green Party

  • Rent Costs: Proposes a hard cap on rent increases (limiting rises to a maximum of 2% per year) and aims to scale up public and affordable housing.

  • Healthy Homes & Quality: Introduces an independent Rental Warrant of Fitness to fix gaps in current standards and requires better energy efficiency transparency.

  • Tenancy Security: Bans no-cause evictions , encourages long-term or permanent tenancies by default, and proposes a national register of landlords and property managers.

Labour Party

  • Rent Costs: Maintains current rules allowing rent increases only once every 12 months, without a strict price cap, while expanding public housing supply (committing to 6,000+ additional social housing places) and offering a rent-to-buy scheme for state/community housing tenants.

  • Healthy Homes & Quality: Strengthens Healthy Homes requirements by mandating proper curtains or blinds , limiting routine insurance/landlord inspections to once every six months, and introducing a landlord duty of care for hazards.

  • Tenancy Security: Reverses the coalition government's policy by banning no-cause evictions (requiring valid reasons to end a tenancy) and extending required notice periods (e.g., 63 to 90 days depending on the reason).

National Party / ACT / NZ First (Current Coalition / Center-Right Parties)

  • National: Focuses on housing supply rather than new tenancy restrictions—supporting first-home loan changes, solar/energy funding, and keeping current tenancy laws (including no-cause terminations).

  • ACT: Focuses heavily on property supply and deregulation, planning reforms, and allowing residential rental losses to be offset against other taxable income (reversing loss ring-fencing) to help landlord cash flow, with no new tenancy restrictions.

  • NZ First: Concentrates on infrastructure, housing priority for citizens, and regional development without altering general tenant-landlord tenancy laws.

Opportunity Party (TOP)

  • Rent Costs: Focuses on systemic tax shifts (such as an annual land value tax) rather than rent caps.

  • Healthy Homes & Quality: Expands the Warmer Kiwi Homes scheme to cover eligible rentals (including double glazing and solar) and raises overall standards, though it does not mandate a ban on no-cause evictions.

You can explore full policy comparisons on Policy.nz or read the RNZ Housing Policy Guide.

Would you like to look into how these parties' student allowance or student loan policies compare with their housing plans, or do you want to explore tenant support groups in New Zealand?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account