ChatGPT · No location
My partner and I rent, have steady jobs and are trying to save a deposit for our first home. We worry that the target keeps moving. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties propose changes to taxes on property or capital gains, and what could those changes mean for people trying to buy?
For a couple renting on steady incomes and saving a first-home deposit, the important question is not simply which party promises lower taxes. It is whether its tax policies would make it easier to save, reduce competition from property investors, or change the price of the homes you are trying to buy.
In New Zealand, the main political dividing lines are around:
- Whether capital gains on investment property should be taxed.
- Whether landlords should receive more or fewer tax deductions.
- Whether the tax system should favour owner-occupied homes over investment property.
- Whether property taxes should help fund infrastructure and housing supply.
One important distinction: a tax change that makes investment property less attractive might help first-home buyers compete, but it does not automatically make houses affordable. Interest rates, construction costs, housing supply and wages also matter.
1. Which parties are proposing property or capital gains tax changes?
The following reflects published policy available as at 1 November 2026, ahead of the 7 November general election. These are proposals, not laws. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionSummary of 2026 election tax policies
Labour
Targeted capital gains tax
Labour proposes:
- A 28% capital gains tax on gains from residential investment properties and commercial property.
- The tax would apply to gains made from 1 July 2027 onwards, not increases in value before that date.
- The family home, farms, shares and KiwiSaver would be exempt.
- Revenue would be ring-fenced for the health system.
- Landlords would retain the current interest deductibility rules.
What it could mean for you: Investors would pay tax on qualifying profits when they sell. This could make some investors less interested in buying property purely for capital appreciation, potentially reducing competition for first-home buyers.
However, it is not a tax on the property purchase price, and it does not guarantee lower house prices. Some landlords might instead increase rents or hold properties for longer. Labour’s capital gains tax explained – what is it and who will pay?Tax Tips: 2026 General Election
Green Party
Wealth tax and tighter landlord taxation
The Greens propose:
- An annual 2.5% wealth tax on individual net assets above $10 million.
- Exemption of the family home from the wealth tax.
- Restoring the 10-year bright-line test for residential investment property.
- Removing mortgage interest deductibility for residential landlords.
The wealth tax is aimed at very wealthy individuals, so it would not directly affect most people saving for their first home.
The landlord changes are more relevant to you. Removing interest deductions increases the tax burden on rental property owners, potentially making some investment properties less attractive.
Potential benefit: Less investor competition for homes.
Potential downside: Landlords might sell properties, reduce investment in rentals or try to pass additional costs on through rent increases. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionElection tax policies, part one
Te Pāti Māori
Wealth and property taxes
Te Pāti Māori proposes:
- A progressive wealth tax, starting at 1.5% on net wealth above $2 million.
- A 33% land-banking tax targeting land held for speculative purposes.
- A 2% vacant-house tax.
- A 5% stamp duty on residential property sales, with an exemption for first-home buyers purchasing homes under $1 million.
- A $30,000 income-tax-free threshold.
What it could mean for you: The first-home buyer stamp-duty exemption is particularly relevant. If implemented as proposed, it could help eligible buyers avoid an additional transaction cost when purchasing a home under $1 million.
The land-banking and vacant-house taxes are intended to discourage leaving valuable land or housing unused.
The potential drawback is that property taxes can affect the behaviour of landlords, developers and property sellers. The eventual impact on prices and rents would depend on how they respond. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionPF020: Tax and public spending · AI election answers
The Opportunity Party (TOP)
Annual land value tax
TOP proposes an annual:
- 1.75% tax on urban land value.
- 0.5% tax on rural land value.
This is a land value tax (LVT), not a conventional capital gains tax.
The important difference is that it taxes the underlying value of the land rather than the value of buildings and improvements.
What it could mean for you: This could discourage people from holding valuable urban land purely for speculative gains or leaving it underdeveloped.
It could encourage more productive use of land and potentially improve housing supply over time.
However, it could also increase the ongoing ownership costs of a home you eventually purchase. You would need to consider the effect on your future household budget, not just the purchase price. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionElection tax policies, part one
2. What about National, ACT and New Zealand First?
These parties have taken a different approach.
| Party | Position on property and capital gains taxes |
|---|---|
| National | Opposes introducing a capital gains tax and campaigns on a no-new-taxes pledge. |
| ACT | Emphasises lower taxes and investment incentives rather than introducing broad property or capital gains taxes. |
| New Zealand First | Has not put forward a comparable major new property or capital gains tax proposal in its published tax programme. |
National's approach is broadly to retain the existing tax framework and encourage investment. ACT similarly favours targeted tax changes rather than broad new taxes on wealth or property.
New Zealand First has focused more on other tax and economic settings, including business taxation and retirement savings.
This doesn't mean these parties have no housing policies. It means their proposed tax changes are less focused on taxing property investment or accumulated wealth. Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionSummary of 2026 election tax policies
3. Comparing the proposals from a first-home buyer's perspective
Here is how the major proposals compare against your priorities.
| Party | Potential advantage for first-home buyers | Possible disadvantage |
|---|---|---|
| Labour | Could reduce investor demand for property. | No guaranteed reduction in house prices; possible rental-market effects. |
| Greens | Could reduce landlord tax advantages and investor demand. | Potential pressure on rental supply and rents. |
| Te Pāti Māori | Explicit stamp-duty exemption for eligible first-home buyers under $1m. | Other property taxes could affect sellers, landlords and developers. |
| TOP | Could discourage land speculation and encourage development. | Annual land tax could make owning a home more expensive. |
| National | Avoids introducing a new capital gains tax. | Less direct tax intervention to reduce investor competition. |
| ACT | Emphasises investment and lower-tax settings. | Does not offer the same property-investor tax changes as the left-leaning parties. |
| NZ First | No comparable major new property tax proposal. | No equivalent targeted first-home stamp-duty exemption announced. |
Tax Tips: 2026 General ElectionSummary of 2026 election tax policies
4. A practical example: what could change for you?
Imagine you and your partner have saved $100,000 towards a deposit on a $700,000 home.
There are three different things to consider:
A. The price of the home
If investor demand falls, that could reduce competition at auctions and potentially slow house-price growth.
For example, if a home that might otherwise have increased from $700,000 to $750,000 instead stayed at $700,000, you would need less money to buy it.
That is an illustrative scenario, not a forecast of what any party's policy would achieve.
B. The amount you need to save
Te Pāti Māori's proposed stamp-duty exemption could directly reduce the transaction costs for eligible first-home buyers.
Other parties' capital and land tax proposals are more indirect: they would try to influence the market rather than give you a direct deposit payment.
C. The cost of renting while you save
This is particularly important.
If landlords face higher tax bills, they might sell investment properties, which could eventually reduce rental availability. Alternatively, some could try to increase rents.
If rents rise faster than your wages, you could find it harder to save your deposit even if house prices become more affordable.
There is no certainty that a tax on landlords will be absorbed by landlords rather than tenants.
5. What I would pay particular attention to before voting
For your circumstances, I would look beyond the headline tax rates and ask five questions:
- Will the policy reduce the gap between wages and house prices? A tax that slows investor demand might help, but you want evidence that it will improve affordability rather than simply change who owns property.
- Will it make renting more expensive? You need to keep saving while renting, so rental-market consequences matter enormously.
- Does it offer direct help to first-home buyers? Te Pāti Māori's proposed stamp-duty exemption stands out here.
- Will it encourage more homes to be built? Reducing speculative landholding is one approach; increasing housing supply is another.
- Can the party realistically implement it? Under MMP, coalition negotiations matter. A party's election promises may be watered down or abandoned depending on its negotiating partners. Summary of 2026 election tax policiesTax Tips: 2026 General Election
6. My overall assessment
There are essentially two competing philosophies in this election:
- Labour, the Greens, Te Pāti Māori and TOP want to change the way property, land, capital or wealth are taxed. Their argument is that the current system gives property investment advantages and contributes to inequality and housing affordability problems.
- National, ACT and, broadly, New Zealand First favour fewer broad-based taxes on property and wealth, with greater emphasis on investment, savings and other economic measures.
For a couple in your position, I would pay particular attention to the difference between policies that potentially lower the price of a house and policies that actually help you accumulate a deposit.
Those are not necessarily the same thing.
I would also be cautious about assuming that a capital gains tax will automatically make houses cheaper. It is a change to the incentives facing investors, not a direct house-price control.
Sources worth reading before 7 November
These are particularly useful independent tax-policy comparisons:
- PwC – 2026 General Election: Tax Policy Update — detailed party-by-party proposals.
- KPMG – Summary of 2026 Election Tax Policies — useful comparison of the major tax changes.
- 1News – Labour's capital gains tax explained — particularly helpful for understanding what Labour's proposal actually taxes.
One final thought: Don't let the pressure of a moving house-price target convince you that you're doing something wrong. Saving a deposit while paying rent is genuinely difficult. It is reasonable to want a tax system that doesn't continually reward people who already own property more than people working hard to buy their first one.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account