Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

2026 New Zealand election: Affordable mental health support for tertiary students

The main difference between the parties is how they propose to make mental health care more accessible: through free community services, increased public funding, youth-focused counselling, or broader health-system improvements.

There is also a second issue worth considering in your circumstances: whether policies address the financial pressures that make it difficult to study, work and look after your mental health at the same time.

I've compared the positions published for the 2026 election, using information available as at 1 November 2026.

1. Comparing the parties

Green Party

Broad public-service approach

The Greens' 2026 manifesto emphasises:

  • Safe, accessible and culturally appropriate mental health services.
  • Addressing shortages of mental health professionals and long waiting lists.
  • Tackling the causes of poor mental health, rather than relying mainly on crisis treatment.
  • Recognising student poverty and cuts to university and polytechnic services as barriers to student success.

The Greens have also committed to expanding free mental health services in communities, including Youth One Stop Shops and Piki.

Relevance to you: Their approach connects access to mental health support with the wider financial pressures facing students. However, check whether their proposed free services explicitly cover all tertiary students, regardless of age. Manifesto 2026Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New ZealandYouth Policy

Labour Party

Affordable healthcare and student costs

Labour's published policies include:

  • Three free GP visits annually for everyone through its proposed Medicard.
  • Removing the $5 prescription charge.
  • Better access to mental health and addiction services through properly funded teams and culturally grounded care.
  • A proposed 10% reduction in eligible student loan balances, subject to eligibility conditions.

Labour has indicated that it will release its dedicated mental health policy closer to the election.

Relevance to you: Free GP appointments could make it easier to discuss mental health concerns without worrying about consultation fees. Reducing eligible student debt could also help financially over the longer term.

However, free GP visits do not automatically mean free ongoing counselling or psychologist appointments. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand

National Party

Implementation and service development

National's approach includes:

  • A Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy covering 2026–2036.
  • A three-year implementation plan with 50 actions.
  • More frontline mental health workers.
  • Improved access to support and crisis responses.
  • A proposed youth mental health and addiction roadmap developed with young people.
  • Better integration of mental health support with housing and employment services.

National has also announced changes to student loan repayments for graduates living in New Zealand.

Relevance to you: Its strategy recognises that housing and employment pressures affect mental health. The proposed youth roadmap could improve services for younger students.

The important distinction is that these measures do not currently establish a specific entitlement to free ongoing tertiary counselling. Promised Mental Health Strategy launched2026 Election PolicyNational’s plan for young adults

New Zealand First

Youth counselling and community services

NZ First's stated priorities include:

  • Expanding access to school counselling.
  • Supporting free youth counselling through Gumboot Friday, including $6 million in funding it says it secured.
  • Establishing Mental Health Response Units.
  • Face-to-face suicide prevention and addressing cyberbullying.
  • Resourcing youth mental health services in communities.

Relevance to you: Its focus is on accessible youth support and community-based services. However, school counselling does not necessarily extend to university or polytechnic students, and the party has not specified a universal free counselling entitlement for tertiary students in the evidence reviewed. Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New ZealandMental Health & Addiction 2026 General Election Debate - Events

Te Pāti Māori

Free community-based care

Te Pāti Māori has proposed:

  • Investing in kaupapa Māori mental health services.
  • Providing free community-based mental health services for everyone.
  • Treating addiction as a health issue rather than primarily a criminal justice issue.
  • Decriminalising drug use and introducing health-based addiction responses.

Relevance to you: Its commitment to free community-based mental health services is particularly relevant if counselling costs are a barrier. Its kaupapa Māori approach also provides for culturally grounded support.

The published commitment is broader than a student-only programme, although the specific eligibility, delivery arrangements and funding details need further examination. Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand

The Opportunity Party (TOP)

Prevention and early intervention

TOP proposes:

  • Shifting investment towards prevention and early intervention.
  • Stable, multi-year funding for mental health services.
  • Growing the workforce, including counsellors, mental health nurses and peer-support workers.
  • Free, clinically validated digital mental health tools for people with mild-to-moderate needs.
  • A ten-year cross-party health plan.

Relevance to you: Free digital support could be useful if you cannot fit appointments around work and study. More counsellors could also improve access to face-to-face care.

However, free digital tools are not equivalent to free ongoing counselling with a qualified professional. Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New ZealandMental Health & Addiction 2026 General Election Debate - Events

ACT New Zealand

ACT did not provide a response to the National Council of Women's 2026 mental health policy question.

I could not verify a specific ACT election commitment establishing free counselling for tertiary students in the sources reviewed. This should be treated as an information gap, rather than proof that ACT has no relevant mental health policies. Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand2026 Election Policy

2. Side-by-side comparison

Party Main mental health approach Explicit free support commitment
Greens Expand community services and address workforce shortages Expand free community mental health services
Labour Affordable primary healthcare and better-funded mental health teams Free GP visits, but no confirmed universal free counselling commitment
National Long-term strategy, workforce and youth services No specific universal tertiary counselling entitlement identified
NZ First Youth counselling and community response Supports free youth counselling through Gumboot Friday
Te Pāti Māori Kaupapa Māori and community-based care Free community mental health services for all
TOP Prevention, early intervention and workforce expansion Free digital mental health tools for mild-to-moderate needs
ACT No specific commitment verified in the sources reviewed Not established

The comparison draws on party statements, the National Council of Women's 2026 election survey and published election policies. Election Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New ZealandManifesto 2026Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesPromised Mental Health Strategy launched

3. What matters most given your circumstances?

Because you're renting, working part-time and using a student loan, I'd suggest examining four practical questions when reading party policies.

What to investigate Why it matters
Counselling fees Can you see a counsellor without paying privately?
Eligibility Are university and polytechnic students covered, including those over 24?
Appointment availability Can you get help without waiting months or missing paid work?
Financial support Would student support changes reduce the need to work extra hours?

There are some important distinctions beyond mental health policy:

  • Student debt: Labour and National have both announced student-loan-related policies, although their proposals differ.
  • Student poverty: The Greens explicitly connect student poverty and tertiary education services with student wellbeing.
  • Housing and financial security: TOP's proposed Citizen's Income and Te Pāti Māori's income and housing proposals are also relevant to broader financial pressures. These are not mental health services themselves.

4. Questions worth asking before deciding

I would pay particular attention to whether parties have specific answers to these questions:

  1. Will free counselling be available to all tertiary students, not just school students or people under 25?
  2. Will universities and polytechnics receive additional funding for on-campus counsellors?
  3. How many free counselling sessions will someone be entitled to?
  4. Will services be available outside normal working hours, including online?
  5. Will the proposed funding reduce waiting lists, rather than simply increase demand for existing services?

These details matter because a promise of more mental health funding does not necessarily mean you will be able to get an affordable appointment when you need one.

5. Useful sources for checking the policies

These are good places to read the original commitments rather than relying on campaign summaries:

My overall takeaway

There are three particularly important policy distinctions to understand:

  • Directly reducing the cost of care: Look closely at the Greens' and Te Pāti Māori's commitments to free mental health services.
  • Improving access and capacity: Compare National's long-term strategy, TOP's workforce proposals and NZ First's youth and community services.
  • Reducing the financial pressures around studying: Examine Labour's healthcare and student-loan proposals, the Greens' student poverty commitments and the wider income-support proposals from other parties.

None of these policy announcements alone guarantees affordable, timely counselling for every tertiary student.

Your vote is also not just about which party promises more mental health funding. It is about whether the proposed services would realistically fit around your studies, employment and financial circumstances.

One useful next step: I can put together a more detailed comparison specifically of student allowances, student loan living-cost limits, rent affordability and mental health support, so you can see which parties address the combined pressure of having to work while studying.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

Navigating part-time work, tertiary study, and a student loan while trying to look after your mental health is a heavy balancing act. Ahead of the 2026 general election, New Zealand political parties have laid out distinct frameworks for addressing student and youth mental health, touching on primary healthcare costs, tertiary/youth-specific support, and early intervention.

The primary approaches and proposals from the major political parties regarding affordable mental health and health access include the following:


Overview of Party Approaches

  • Labour Party
    • Focus: Reducing overall primary care costs, which indirectly benefits students trying to see a GP or counselor.
    • Key Policies: Proposes three free general practitioner (GP) consultations each year for everyone entitled to publicly funded healthcare (via a "Medicard") and aims to restore universally free prescriptions. Lowering primary care costs targets a major financial barrier for students seeking mental health triage or referrals.
  • National Party
    • Focus: Strengthening front-line health services, expanding community-based mental health workforces, and partnering with non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to deliver mental health and addiction services.
    • Key Policies: Emphasizes reducing wait times for specialist services and expanding community and youth-focused support pipelines, alongside building up workforce capacity to ease bottlenecks in primary and secondary care.
  • Green Party
    • Focus: Broad structural support for young people, income security, and universal student support.
    • Key Policies: The Greens emphasize that financial stress is a primary driver of poor mental health. They advocate for lifting main benefits and student support to liveable income levels, expanding access to youth health and wellbeing hubs, and integrating mental health support heavily into education and community settings.
  • ACT New Zealand
    • Focus: Practical, targeted access and supporting existing school/tertiary pastoral channels rather than sweeping new state-mandated mental health systems.
    • Key Policies: Supports evidence-based access to student mental health support by enabling schools and tertiary frameworks to partner with community and local groups that have proven track records.
  • Te Pāti Māori
    • Focus: Whānau-centred, culturally safe, and free community care.
    • Key Policies: Proposes expanding integrated youth primary health services and heavily investing in Kaupapa Māori mental health and free community-based services to ensure accessibility for Māori and high-need youth demographics.

How These Plans Relate to Your Situation

  • Financial Barriers: If your struggle is partly driven by the cost of seeing a health professional, policies targeting free GP visits (like Labour’s proposed three free annual consultations) or income support adjustments (favoured by the Greens) directly address the squeeze of trying to pay for healthcare on a student budget.
  • Youth & Student Services: Parties focusing on youth health hubs and expanded community-based counselling aim to bridge the gap for 18-to-24-year-olds—an age bracket that data shows has faced some of the steepest barriers and longest wait times for specialist mental health care.

What specific aspect of student mental health support—such as reducing the cost of seeing a professional, campus-based counselling services, or easing financial stress through student allowances—is most important to your vote?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

Navigating part-time work, tenancy costs, and tertiary study is a heavy juggle, and it makes complete sense that you are looking closely at how different political parties intend to support student wellbeing and mental health.

When comparing party platforms at a national level for the New Zealand general election , approaches to affordable mental health generally split along traditional philosophical lines: broad structural/universal health funding versus targeted or primary-care-led delivery.

Key Differences in Party Approaches

  • Parties on the Left (e.g., Labour, Green Party, Te Pāti Māori):

  • Core Approach: Focus heavily on removing financial barriers at the point of access by making primary healthcare significantly cheaper or entirely free.

  • For Students: This often includes policies to provide free GP visits or expanded free access to youth mental health services (such as Gumboot Friday or community-based counselling initiatives) without requiring a co-pay. The logic is that if a GP visit costs nothing, a student won't delay seeking help for anxiety, depression, or stress due to a lack of cash.

  • Tertiary Funding: Generally advocate for increased direct funding to tertiary institutions specifically ring-fenced for on-campus student support services and counseling ratios.

  • Parties Currently in Government / Center-Right (e.g., National, ACT, New Zealand First):

  • Core Approach: Focus on maximizing existing health funding, expanding workforce capacity (such as training more practitioners or utilizing pharmacists and community roles), and targeted mental health initiatives.

  • For Students: Rather than universal free GP care for all demographics, their focus tends to be on specialized mental health targets, funding community and frontline providers, and integrating mental health support into primary care or specific regional health delivery.

  • Efficiency & Delivery: Emphasize measurable clinical outcomes, waitlist reductions, and partnerships with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rather than broad systemic reconfigurations.


If you'd like to narrow this down further, let me know:

  • Are you more interested in on-campus institutional support or community/GP access?
  • Would you like details on specific party manifestos regarding student allowances and living costs alongside mental health?
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a tertiary student renting a room, working part time and using a student loan. I am struggling to fit paid work around study. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What differences are there in parties' plans for affordable mental health support for students?

AI Overview

Major New Zealand political parties offer distinct approaches to student mental health, cost-of-living relief, and healthcare access ahead of the 2026 general election :

Labour Party

  • Free GP Visits: Introduces a "Medicard" providing three free GP visits a year and free prescriptions , lowering the cost of seeing a doctor or accessing mental health medication.

  • Student Loan Relief: Cuts student loan balances by 10% for eligible graduates and current/future students (after staying in New Zealand for three years) and completely wipes debts of $2,000 or less.

  • Cost of Living: Caps public transport fares at $20 a week in major cities (Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch) and $10 a week elsewhere to ease travel pressures.

Green Party

  • Free & Universal Healthcare: Transitions privately funded health and mental health services into publicly owned, free services—aiming to eliminate therapy waiting lists by training and hiring more psychologists, psychotherapists, and social workers.

  • Student & Trainee Support: Proposes universal student payments and stipends (such as weekly placement stipends) so students are not forced to choose between studying, working long hours, and paying bills.

  • School & Campus Support: Expands criteria for learning support and increases wellbeing resources in places of learning.

National Party (Current Government)

  • Mental Health Strategy: Relies on its 10-year Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy (2026–2036) and continues school-based mental health initiatives alongside funding for external youth support services like Gumboot Friday.

  • Primary Care Support: Focuses on integrating health coaches into primary care and boosting Pharmac's budget to subsidize more medicines.

ACT Party

  • Targeted Intervention & Efficiency: Focuses on reducing mental health beneficiary numbers back to 2017 levels (budgeting $600 million) and supporting community/school-based access without turning teachers into clinicians or schools into health clinics.

  • Economic Approach: Favors freezing the adult minimum wage and reducing government department administrative costs rather than broad universal free-care policies.

Te Pāti Māori

  • Dedicated Funding: Pledges $500 million annually into Kaupapa Māori mental health and free community-based mental health services, alongside large investments in health workforce development.

If you want to narrow this down, let me know:

  • Are you looking for policies specifically on counselling on campus vs. general cost-of-living relief?
  • Which specific parties or policy areas do you want to compare first?
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account