Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do for households whose wages are not keeping up with groceries and bills?

2026 New Zealand election: what would parties do about the cost of living?

For a household renting together and relying on rostered wages, there are two separate problems to consider:

  1. Income uncertainty: Your household might earn less next week because you receive fewer shifts, even though your rent, power and other commitments remain unchanged.
  2. Declining purchasing power: Even when you work your normal hours, groceries, petrol, electricity and rent can take up more of your combined income.

These are important distinctions when comparing election policies. A tax cut might help you keep more of your wages, but it doesn't necessarily help when your hours suddenly drop. Likewise, a minimum-wage increase doesn't necessarily protect someone whose employer offers fewer shifts.

The 2026 New Zealand general election is on 7 November 2026. The following is a comparison of the main parties' published policies and proposals as at 1 November. These are election commitments, not guaranteed outcomes. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingKnow Your Vote

1. The parties compared

The seven parties worth examining in this comparison are National, Labour, the Greens, ACT, New Zealand First, Te Pāti Māori and the Opportunity Party.

Party Main approach Policies relevant to household budgets
Labour Direct cost-of-living relief and employment protections Inflation-linked minimum-wage increases, restoring pay equity, fair-pay agreements, cheaper transport, free prescriptions and action on grocery and electricity pricing.
National Economic growth, lower government spending and tax restraint No new taxes, more grocery competition through separating PAK'nSAVE and New World, energy reforms, and encouraging investment and job creation.
Green Party Redistribution and stronger public services First $10,000 of income tax-free, public transport investment, food grants, stronger renter protections, rent regulation and public involvement in electricity and supermarkets.
ACT Lower taxes, smaller government and private-sector growth Tax and regulatory changes intended to encourage investment, business activity and productivity. Its approach relies more on economic growth than direct household subsidies.
New Zealand First Targeted household assistance and economic development Annual minimum-wage increases over three years, substantially increased Working for Families, and proposals to reduce food costs.
Te Pāti Māori Greater redistribution and lower costs for essentials First $30,000 of income tax-free, removing GST from food, a tax credit for groceries for eligible earners, and increased taxation of wealth.
The Opportunity Party (TOP) A guaranteed income and tax-system restructuring A proposed citizen's income of up to $370 a week for nearly all adults, funded partly through a land-value tax.

Sources: The Conversation's 2026 policy tracker, Policy.nz's party comparison and parties' published policy material. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026Our Policy2026 Election Policy

There are some important differences behind these summaries.

Labour: targeting the bills you pay every week

Labour has published a relatively detailed cost-of-living package.

Its proposals include:

  • A weekly public transport fare cap of $20 in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, and $10 elsewhere.
  • Free prescriptions by removing the $5 charge.
  • Three free GP visits annually through a proposed Medicard.
  • A three-year fuel-tax freeze.
  • Measures against excessive grocery, fuel and electricity pricing.
  • More supermarket competition through independently operated wholesalers.
  • Minimum-wage increases in line with inflation.
  • Restoring pay equity and fair-pay agreements.

For electricity, Labour also proposes low-interest solar loans and additional support of up to $3,000 for eligible low- and middle-income households.

What this could mean for you: More potential savings on regular expenses, particularly if you use public transport or pay for prescriptions and GP visits. Wage and employment policies could also matter if your industry is covered.

However, most of these measures don't directly guarantee income when your employer cuts your rostered hours. Release: Labour’s plan to lower bills and build a better New ZealandLabour's Cost of Living PlanElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

National: keeping taxes down and growing the economy

National's argument is that household finances improve when businesses invest, productivity increases and more jobs become available.

Its published policies include:

  • No new taxes.
  • A focus on returning the Government to surplus.
  • Reforms intended to improve competition between supermarkets.
  • Changes intended to improve energy affordability and security.
  • More housing construction and easier development.
  • A welfare system focused on employment.

National also proposes making KiwiSaver compulsory for workers, with contributions gradually increasing towards 6% for both employers and employees by 2032.

What this could mean for you: The approach aims to improve employment opportunities and economic conditions over time. However, increased KiwiSaver contributions could also mean less immediately available take-home pay as the changes take effect.

There is less emphasis on direct compensation for households experiencing a sudden reduction in weekly working hours.

The Greens: stronger protections and more direct redistribution

The Green Party proposes a more substantial role for government in reducing household costs.

Its policies include:

  • Making the first $10,000 of income tax-free.
  • Increasing taxes on very high incomes and substantial wealth.
  • More public investment in electricity and renewable energy.
  • Stronger renter protections and rent regulation.
  • Increasing food grants and doubling the cap on food grants from Work and Income.
  • A $150 million fair-food fund.
  • More affordable public transport.
  • Restoring and expanding school lunches.

What this could mean for you: Lower income tax could leave more money in your weekly pay, while stronger tenancy protections could help address rent pressures. Food assistance and electricity reforms could also be relevant.

One important distinction is that stronger rental regulation and increased public spending are proposals that would need to be implemented and funded. Their actual effect on your rent and bills is not guaranteed.

ACT: lower taxes and less government intervention

ACT's general approach is to reduce government spending and regulation, encourage private investment and improve productivity.

Its tax proposals include moving towards a two-rate income-tax system with a 28% top rate, alongside changes to taxation of investment and KiwiSaver.

What this could mean for you: The emphasis is on economic growth, employment opportunities and allowing workers and businesses to retain more of their earnings.

The important question for your circumstances is what happens if your hours fall. ACT's general economic approach is less focused on direct household income guarantees or extensive price controls. Cost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026NZ Election 2026: Every Party's Tax Policy Compared

New Zealand First: wage increases and family assistance

New Zealand First has specifically pledged to campaign for:

  • Annual minimum-wage increases for the next three years.
  • A substantial increase in Working for Families tax credits.
  • Measures aimed at reducing food costs.

Winston Peters also indicated a proposal to increase Working for Families by potentially more than $120 per week, although the full details and eligibility arrangements need to be checked against the final policy.

What this could mean for you: Higher minimum wages could help if you are paid near the minimum wage. However, Working for Families is principally relevant to households with dependent children, so it may not help a couple without children.

The distinction between a general wage increase and targeted family assistance is important. Our PolicyNZ First pledges $120/week-plus rise in Working for Family tax credits

Te Pāti Māori: reducing the tax burden on lower incomes

Te Pāti Māori proposes:

  • Making the first $30,000 of income tax-free.
  • Removing GST from food.
  • An Income Tax Kai Credit for people earning up to $60,000, worth up to the equivalent of eight weeks of groceries annually.
  • Additional taxation of substantial wealth.

What this could mean for you: The tax-free threshold and grocery credit could directly benefit lower-income earners. Removing GST from food is intended to reduce grocery costs more broadly.

The important questions are how the measures would be funded, how the grocery credit would work and how much of the GST reduction retailers would pass on to consumers. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingCost of Living Policy: Where NZ Parties Stand in 2026

The Opportunity Party: a regular income rather than relying entirely on wages

TOP proposes a citizen's income of up to $370 a week for nearly all adults.

The proposed system would replace most existing benefits, with additional support for groups such as parents and superannuitants. It would be funded partly through a 1.75% annual land-value tax.

What this could mean for you: This is particularly relevant to the problem of variable working hours.

A regular income payment could provide a baseline when your rostered wages fall. However, the details matter enormously: eligibility, how payments interact with wages, how existing benefits are replaced and whether your household would actually receive the full amount.

It is a proposed major restructuring of the welfare and tax systems, rather than a small adjustment to existing benefits.

2. Which policies address unpredictable weekly pay?

This is arguably the most important part of your situation.

Here is how the proposals compare against the specific problem of having a smaller payslip one week.

Policy question Relevant parties
A regular income independent of hours worked TOP
More take-home pay through income-tax changes Greens, Te Pāti Māori, ACT
Minimum-wage increases Labour, NZ First
Stronger pay and employment protections Labour, Greens
More assistance with grocery costs Greens, Te Pāti Māori, Labour
Increased family tax credits NZ First, where eligible
Lower everyday transport and healthcare costs Labour, Greens
Less government intervention and lower taxes National, ACT

One thing stands out: most parties concentrate on increasing wages or reducing expenses, rather than protecting workers from fluctuations in their weekly hours.

TOP's citizen's income is a particularly different proposal because it addresses the idea of having a dependable income floor. But its implementation and interaction with existing assistance would need careful examination.

3. Renting deserves separate consideration

Because you rent rather than own your home, housing policy matters differently.

Consider these questions when assessing the parties:

  • Would your rent be more predictable?
  • Would you have better protection against unexpected rent increases?
  • Would electricity costs become more manageable?
  • Would you receive help with housing costs if your income dropped?
  • Would policies make it easier to save a deposit without sacrificing your ability to pay rent?

The Greens propose stronger rent regulation and renter protections. Labour has proposed a rent-to-buy scheme for eligible working tenants in Kāinga Ora and participating community housing properties, offering a $100 weekly credit towards a future deposit.

National places greater emphasis on increasing housing supply and enabling construction.

These approaches have different objectives: immediate protection for existing renters versus improving housing supply and affordability over time. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising2026 Election Policy

4. Something worth checking about your current employment rights

There is also a distinction between genuinely casual employment and employment with guaranteed hours but variable rosters.

Under New Zealand employment law:

  • Your employment agreement should specify agreed hours or explain the working-time arrangements.
  • An employer generally cannot require you to remain available beyond guaranteed hours without meeting the requirements for a valid availability provision.
  • Shift cancellation provisions must specify reasonable notice and compensation if the required notice isn't provided.

This is worth checking if your employer regularly changes your roster or cancels shifts. Version as at 21 February 2026  Employment Relations Act 2000  Part 6 s 67GEmployment agreements and making a job offerWorking overtime or extra shifts

Official information: Employment New Zealand – working overtime and extra shifts.

5. How I would assess the policies against your circumstances

Rather than looking only at which party promises the biggest wage increase or tax reduction, I'd examine five things:

What matters What to look for
Income stability Support when weekly earnings unexpectedly fall
Take-home pay How much of your wages you actually retain
Rent security Protections against increases and housing insecurity
Grocery affordability Whether food costs are directly addressed
Essential bills Electricity, transport and healthcare assistance

I'd also pay attention to whether a policy benefits individuals or households.

For example, a tax-free threshold might benefit each eligible earner individually, while some welfare and family assistance payments depend on combined household income, relationship status and whether you have children.

That distinction can make a substantial difference to a couple who both work.

6. My suggested questions to ask before voting

There are three questions I would particularly want parties to answer:

  1. If someone normally works 35 hours but receives only 18 hours next week, what financial support would be available?
  2. If both partners work but their combined income fluctuates, what assistance is available before they fall behind on rent or bills?
  3. What will actually make groceries, electricity and rent more affordable, rather than simply assuming wages will eventually catch up?

These questions get beyond election slogans and into the practical consequences of policy.

For further independent comparisons, these are useful resources:

One question that would help me make this comparison more useful

Do you and your partner have children, or is it just the two of you?

I'm asking because it changes the relevance of Working for Families, family tax credits and several other policies.

I can then put together a more focused comparison of all seven parties, specifically looking at a two-adult renting household with fluctuating weekly wages, including which proposals could help immediately, which offer longer-term benefits, and which might make little difference to your circumstances.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do for households whose wages are not keeping up with groceries and bills?

Navigating variable rostered hours while facing fixed costs like rent, groceries, and bills is a stressful financial tightrope. When your pay fluctuates unexpectedly, maintaining stability becomes a central challenge.

In the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have offered contrasting approaches to easing the cost-of-living squeeze, supporting lower-income households, and addressing wage and housing pressures.


1. Cost-of-Living Relief and Direct Household Expenses

Different parties target the immediate drains on a household budget—such as power, transport, and health costs—through very different mechanisms:

  • Labour: Focuses on targeted public service relief. Their platform includes a cost-of-living plan featuring free primary GP visits, free prescriptions, a $20 public transport fare cap, and a fuel tax freeze. They also propose limits on annual rent increases and banning no-cause evictions to protect renters from sudden housing instability.
  • National: Emphasizes macroeconomic management, keeping taxes low, and curbing inflation to lower the costs of everyday goods over time. Their approach relies heavily on fiscal discipline and boosting business growth to organically drive up wages, alongside targeted, temporary support during global energy or fuel crises.
  • Green Party & Te Pāti Māori: Focus on sweeping structural redistribution. Both advocate for higher income floors (such as raising the minimum wage directly to the living wage), introducing wealth or asset taxes on high net-worth individuals, and heavily subsidizing public housing, insulation, and community energy initiatives.
  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes market competition (particularly regarding supermarket duopolies and fuel prices), lifting Working for Families tax credits, and tying minimum wage adjustments strictly to inflation.

2. Wages, Income Security, and Precarious Work

For workers whose hours change week-to-week, standard minimum wage policies or salary structures don't always capture the reality of income drops. Parties approach this through different angles:

  • Minimum Wage and Inflation: Parties like NZ First and the Greens support ensuring the minimum wage keeps pace with or exceeds inflation, though business-aligned parties like ACT and National argue that aggressive minimum wage hikes can stifle job creation and business flexibility.
  • Worker Protections and Small Business Support: Labour and the Greens generally advocate for stronger union rights, collective bargaining expansions, and tighter rules distinguishing contractors from employees to prevent worker exploitation in variable industries. Conversely, National and ACT focus on reducing regulatory and compliance costs for businesses, arguing that a thriving business sector is the best generator of stable hours and employment.
  • Welfare and Income Safety Nets: If a rostered worker's hours drop drastically, the welfare system acts as the ultimate backstop. Left-bloc parties (Greens, Te Pāti Māori, and the Opportunities Party through its "Citizen’s Income" proposal) advocate for significantly lifting baseline benefit levels and easing abatement thresholds so that casual or fluctuating earnings don't instantly wipe out government support.

3. Rent and Housing Costs

Because rent is usually a household's largest fixed monthly bill, housing policy heavily dictates overall financial breathing room:

  • Renters' Rights vs. Supply: Left-leaning parties lean into direct market interventions—such as tenancy protections (banning no-cause evictions) and caps on rent increases—to shield tenants from sudden cost spikes.
  • Supply-Side Solutions: Right-leaning parties (National and ACT) focus primarily on freeing up land supply, easing planning and consenting restrictions, and incentivizing private development to build more houses, arguing that increased supply is the only sustainable way to cool down rental and purchase prices.

When evaluating your vote, it helps to weigh whether you prefer direct government subsidies and market controls (favored by the left bloc to artificially lower specific household expenses) or broader economic management, tax relief, and supply-side growth (favored by the right bloc to reduce structural inflation and encourage business investment).

Are you looking for policies that target a specific part of your budget, like relief for renters or grocery prices?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do for households whose wages are not keeping up with groceries and bills?

New Zealand political parties offer distinct approaches to supporting households facing fluctuating rostered wages and high living costs, splitting broadly between tax relief, market regulation, employment protections, and targeted support.


Key Party Approaches to Cost of Living & Household Incomes

  • New Zealand Labour Party: Focuses on direct relief for household overheads and market intervention. Key promises include capping public transport fares, banning price gouging (aimed at supermarket and essential goods pricing), providing three free GP visits a year, cutting student loan balances, and reviewing structural reform in the electricity market to lower power bills

. They also back indexation of support to match inflation or average wage growth, alongside strengthening employee vs. contractor definitions and workplace protections.

  • New Zealand National Party: Focuses primarily on income tax threshold adjustments (adjusting brackets for inflation to increase take-home pay), reducing red tape for business to encourage wage growth, and increasing housing supply to help moderate rental growth over the medium term.

  • ACT New Zealand: Emphasizes broad-based income tax cuts, reducing government spending to ease inflationary pressures on the economy, and reforming employment laws to make contracting and flexible labor arrangements easier rather than imposing rigid hour mandates.

  • Green Party: Proposes direct income support boosts (such as higher core benefits and working-for-families integration), free dental care and universal healthcare access, building more public and affordable rental housing, and introducing baseline income or market controls on essentials to protect low- and middle-income renters.

  • New Zealand First: Concentrates on targeted cost-of-living relief, regional economic support, investigating key industry margins (such as fuel and groceries), and prioritizing New Zealanders in employment and housing markets.


How These Policies Relate to Variable Roster Hours

If your primary challenge is weekly income volatility (where hours drop unexpectedly while fixed costs like rent, power, and food remain flat):

  • Tax and Income Smoothing: Parties offering income-tax threshold adjustments or Working for Families / credit adjustments put more money in your pocket during high-hour weeks, though they do not directly guarantee a minimum weekly pay floor if hours are cut to zero.

  • Bill and Service Reductions: Policies targeting specific overheads—such as electricity market reviews, capped transport, or subsidized healthcare—help cushion your fixed baseline costs regardless of whether your weekly roster is light or heavy.

  • Employment and Hour Regulations: Center-left and left-wing parties (Labour, Greens) lean toward stricter rules around trial periods, contractor classification, and minimum guaranteed hours in certain sectors, whereas center-right parties (National, ACT) favor employer flexibility.

You can read detailed manifesto breakdowns via the RNZ Politics Coverage or compare independent candidate and party positions on platforms like NZBrands Election Research. Labour releases manifesto collating policies ahead of election

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do for households whose wages are not keeping up with groceries and bills?

AI Overview

The cost of living is the primary concern for voters in the 2026 New Zealand general election. For rostered workers facing variable incomes, the key differences between the political parties lie in how they propose to lower fixed household bills, control grocery prices, and regulate the rental market.


Grocery & Supermarket Prices

Political parties are offering distinct structural approaches to break up the supermarket duopoly (Woolworths and Foodstuffs).

  • Labour: Promises a mandatory separation of the wholesale and retail arms of the major supermarket chains to let smaller grocers access stock at fairer prices. They also propose legally banning "price gouging" on essential goods.

  • Green Party: Proposes an "Affordable Kai" policy , which includes spending over $6 billion to buy up 120 existing supermarket stores and establish a publicly-owned supermarket chain. They also support a mandatory pricing accuracy code with automatic consumer compensation.

  • National: Focuses on regulatory monitoring rather than breaking up supply chains, committing to further structural reviews by the Commerce Commission before implementing intervention policies.

  • New Zealand First: Proposes legislating to force the breakup of Foodstuffs into two entirely separate, competing entities based on brand (one for New World/Four Square and another for Pak'nSave).

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for completely removing GST from all food items to provide immediate relief at the checkout.


Rent & Housing Affordability

For renters, the parties offer heavily divided stances on rent control and tenant security.

  • Green Party: Pledges to limit annual rent increases to 2 percent to keep housing costs predictable.

  • Labour: Plans to expand rental protections and create a rent-to-buy pathway.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports a complete rent freeze alongside massive investments into permanent public housing.

  • National & ACT: Maintain that the most effective way to lower rental costs is to increase housing supply by cutting building red tape and restoring tax incentives for landlords, arguing this naturally stabilizes rents.


Utilities, Travel, & Everyday Bills

When rostered income drops unexpectedly, utility bills and commuting costs remain fixed.

  • Labour's Cost of Living Plan: Promises a $20 weekly public transport fare cap , a three-year freeze on fuel taxes, three free GP visits per year via a new "Medicard", and zero upfront costs for household solar installations.

  • Green Party: Seeks to nationalize energy generation ("Kiwipower") to lower household electricity bills, while making local public transport entirely free for low-income earners and under-25s ($2 cap for others).

  • National & ACT: Stand firmly on reducing government spending and cutting income taxes. They argue that leaving more cash in your weekly pay packet is more effective than expanding government subsidies or public services.


Comparison of Key Cost-of-Living Policies

Party Grocery Strategy Rental Stance Bills & Transport Relief
Labour Force wholesale/retail split; ban price gouging Rent-to-buy pathways; expanded tenant rights $20 transport cap; 3 free GP visits; fuel tax freeze
National Commerce Commission reviews Boost supply; landlord tax incentives Focus on broad income tax cuts
Greens Establish a publicly-owned supermarket chain Cap annual rent increases at 2% Free public transport for low-income; nationalized power
ACT Deregulation and supply-side growth Fast-track housing consents to lower costs Broad income tax cuts; freeze minimum wage
NZ First Break up Foodstuffs into competing brands Focus on general housing supply Winter energy bill support for seniors; remove GST on basic food
Te Pāti Māori Remove GST from all food Implement a strict rent freeze Wealth-tax funded public utility investments

If you would like to explore a specific party further, let me know:

  • Which specific bill (groceries, rent, or power) places the highest strain on your weekly budget?

  • Whether you want details on how these parties plan to address job security and roster protections for casual or variable workers.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account