Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

For your situation, the key issue is not simply whether a party promises cheaper GP visits. It's whether you can actually get an appointment when your income fluctuates, without having to choose between seeing a doctor and paying rent or household bills.

There are three things worth comparing in the 2026 New Zealand general election:

  • Cost: What would you pay for an ordinary GP appointment, and would subsidies cover you?
  • Eligibility: Are lower-cost appointments available to everyone, or only people meeting particular income, age or health criteria?
  • Access: Are parties proposing more GPs, longer opening hours, after-hours care or alternatives for people working irregular shifts?

I'll distinguish existing healthcare arrangements from new election proposals, because a promise to maintain an existing subsidy is different from a commitment to reduce appointment costs further.

What the parties are proposing

The following reflects published 2026 election policies and campaign positions available as at 1 November 2026.

1. Labour — three free GP visits per year

Specific fee-reduction proposal

Labour proposes a Medicard giving every person eligible for publicly funded healthcare:

  • Three free GP or nurse consultations each year at their enrolled practice.
  • Automatic access through a card and app, rather than having to claim reimbursement.
  • Removal of the $5 prescription charge from 1 July 2027.
  • A Family Doctor Loan Scheme to help doctors buy into community practices and keep local clinics operating.

Labour says the three free visits would be funded through a targeted 28% capital gains tax on profits from selling investment properties, excluding the family home and several other asset categories.

What it could mean for you: You could use the free consultations when your income is low, without having to prove that your pay has dropped. However, three visits are not unlimited free healthcare. You would need to check what happens if you need more than three appointments in a year.

Source: Labour's affordable healthcare policy. Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

2. Green Party — move towards fully free primary healthcare

Universal free-care ambition

The Greens propose moving towards fully publicly funded primary healthcare, including:

  • Free GP and nurse care.
  • Free dental care.
  • Publicly delivered healthcare clinics, including Māori-led services.
  • Mobile healthcare and dental services, particularly for rural communities.
  • Increased health funding of $3 billion at each of the next four Budgets.

What it could mean for you: The intended direction is that you would not have to pay an ordinary GP fee, regardless of whether you had a particularly good or bad pay week.

The important qualification is that the 2026 manifesto does not provide a detailed implementation timetable or a separate costing for making GP appointments free. It is a longer-term commitment rather than a clearly specified immediate entitlement.

Source: Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

3. Te Pāti Māori — free primary healthcare for all whānau

Te Pāti Māori proposes:

  • Investment in free primary healthcare for all whānau.
  • Free dental care.
  • Free medication delivery.
  • Marae-based health clinics and mobile health services.
  • Re-establishing Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority.
  • Greater funding and decision-making through Māori-led health services.

What it could mean for you: Its stated goal is to remove financial barriers to primary healthcare, rather than make assistance conditional on your weekly earnings.

As with the Greens, the manifesto does not give a detailed rollout date or separate cost for the free GP commitment.

Source: Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery

4. National — more funding for practices and greater service capacity

National's approach is different. Rather than promising free GP appointments for everyone, it has focused on practice funding and expanding healthcare capacity.

Its record and current approach include:

  • Additional GP clinic funding through a $120.6 million funding increase for 2026/27.
  • A funding arrangement under which participating clinics hold fees for 12 months, subject to exceptions.
  • Expanded urgent and after-hours services.
  • More online GP consultations.
  • More medical training places and additional pathways for overseas-trained doctors.
  • A target of improving timely access to general practice.

Existing free GP arrangements for children under 14 remain in place.

What it could mean for you: The clinic funding agreement may help limit fee increases, but it does not guarantee that an adult appointment will be affordable. A fee freeze is also not the same as a free appointment.

Source: Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryAccess to GPs and primary care

5. ACT — invest in retaining GPs and increasing appointments

ACT proposes an additional $400 million over four years for general practice.

Its priorities include:

  • Helping practices pay competitive salaries and retain experienced doctors.
  • Encouraging more doctors to work in New Zealand.
  • Supporting practices to offer extra opening hours.
  • Rewarding additional appointments and improving appointment availability.

ACT opposes Labour's proposal for three free GP visits, arguing that subsidising visits could increase demand without increasing the number of available doctors.

What it could mean for you: More appointments and potentially more flexible hours, but ACT has not promised to reduce what you pay for an ordinary GP visit. Its funding proposal does not guarantee cheaper consultations.

Source: Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?NZ Election 2026 Health Policies for Resident Doctors

6. New Zealand First — focus on prevention and healthcare delivery

NZ First's published health proposals include:

  • Recruiting more doctors, including internationally trained doctors.
  • Expanding nurse practitioner-led digital health clinics.
  • Reducing administrative work for GPs.
  • Increasing GP autonomy.
  • Introducing health coaches into primary care.
  • Shifting more attention towards preventing illness.

What it could mean for you: Its proposals could create more ways to access healthcare, particularly through digital and nurse-led services. However, there is no clearly stated 2026 commitment to free or cheaper ordinary GP appointments.

Source: Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy SummariesShould GP visits or prescriptions be free?

7. Opportunity Party — a longer-term health funding plan

Opportunity proposes:

  • A 10-year, cross-party health plan.
  • Increasing health spending from 7.4% to 9% of GDP.
  • Giving primary, community and preventative healthcare a greater share of funding.

It has not published a specific promise to make GP appointments free or reduce patient fees.

Its stated bottom line for government formation includes establishing a 10-year cross-party health plan.

Source: 2026 Election Policy SummariesShould GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising

Comparing the proposals

Here's the central difference between the parties.

Party GP appointment costs Access and availability
Labour Three free visits annually GP ownership and practice support
Greens Work towards fully free care Public clinics, mobile services
Te Pāti Māori Free primary care ambition Marae clinics and mobile services
National Fee restraint through practice funding More doctors, digital and after-hours care
ACT No specific fee reduction $400m for GP retention and capacity
NZ First No specific fee reduction Digital clinics, recruitment, nurse practitioners
Opportunity No specific fee reduction More long-term primary-care investment

Sources: Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and delivery2026 Election Policy Summaries

What matters particularly when your income fluctuates

There are some important details beyond the election promises.

Your existing entitlements

Currently:

  • Children aged 13 and under qualify for free GP visits.
  • Community Services Card holders receive subsidised GP appointments, although charges vary between practices.
  • Most people aged 14–64 without a Community Services Card pay the $5 prescription charge.
  • A family generally stops paying that prescription charge after collecting 20 items in a year.
  • A Health NZ funding agreement holds participating practices' fees until 1 July 2027, with exceptions.

Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?Should GP visits or prescriptions be free?

One thing worth investigating is whether you qualify for a Community Services Card. If your income varies because of rostered hours, it is worth checking your eligibility rather than assuming you earn too much based on a particularly good pay week.

Work and Income – Community Services Card eligibility

The difference between affordable and accessible

There are two separate problems that election promises need to address:

  1. Affordability: Can you afford the consultation when your pay is lower than expected?
  2. Availability: Can you get an appointment outside the hours you're rostered to work?

A free appointment is of limited help if you cannot get one when you need it. Equally, an extra appointment slot does not solve the problem if you cannot afford the consultation.

The New Zealand Medical Journal makes this distinction in its October 2026 election analysis. Election 2026 and health: promises, priorities and deliveryAccess to GPs and primary care

Questions I would use when assessing each party

Given that you and your partner have fixed housing costs but variable earnings, I would look beyond headline promises and ask:

  • Does the policy make GP fees predictable even when household income drops?
  • Does it provide assistance based on actual household circumstances rather than assuming regular weekly pay?
  • Are free appointments available for routine GP visits, or only specific types of care?
  • Can people access appointments during evenings, weekends or around changing work rosters?
  • What happens when the annual allocation of free appointments runs out?
  • Is there enough funding and enough doctors to make the promised appointments available?

Where to check the policies yourself

These independent resources are useful for checking claims and updates as the election approaches:

My main takeaway: There is a substantial policy difference between parties promising to remove GP fees and parties proposing to improve the supply of appointments while retaining patient charges. For someone whose weekly income changes but whose rent doesn't, that distinction is particularly important.

You don't need to decide based on which party has the biggest health announcement. Look at whether its policy would make the cost of seeing a doctor manageable during your worst-paid weeks, not just your best-paid ones.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

For households on variable rosters where unexpected pay drops clash with fixed costs like rent and power, affording primary healthcare can be a major stress point.

Different political parties approach the issue of GP affordability and access through distinct mechanisms—ranging from universal direct subsidies to workforce funding and alternative care models.


Key Party Proposals on GP Costs and Access

  • New Zealand Labour Party

    • The Policy: Proposes introducing a "Medicard" scheme, which would provide every person entitled to publicly funded healthcare with three free general practitioner (GP) consultations each year at their enrolled practice.
    • Additional Relief: They are also pledging to reinstate universally free prescriptions for funded medicines, removing out-of-pocket pharmacy costs.
    • Funding: This would be financed via a targeted 28% capital gains tax on specified commercial and residential investment properties (excluding the family home and farms). To handle increased demand, they propose a "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" and measures to boost practice capacity.
  • ACT Party

    • The Policy: Focuses heavily on direct workforce investment to address availability and reduce practice strain. They propose an ongoing $100 million annual funding boost for GPs (totalling $400 million over four years).
    • Access Mechanism: Rather than blanket free visits for all, their approach rewards and incentivizes practices to offer extended operating hours and extra appointments for GPs who want to see more patients.
  • Green Party

    • The Policy: Advocates for a broader structural overhaul, including free primary healthcare and dental care for all whānau, alongside a significant expansion of overall health spending as a percentage of GDP.
  • National Party / Current Government Approach

    • The Policy: Current government strategies emphasize making existing health funding go further rather than universal free GP visits. Their primary care focus leans toward expanding the scope of work for other health professionals (such as pharmacists and physician associates) to ease clinical pressure, alongside targeted investments in areas like Pharmac's drug budget for life-saving medicines and specific screening programs.

What this means for your situation

If you are struggling with variable income and find yourself delaying doctor visits due to upfront costs, parties on the left (such as Labour and the Greens) are pitching direct cost-reduction models—like free annual visits—to remove the financial barrier at the clinic. Conversely, other parties (such as ACT and National) focus on boosting overall sector funding, backing workforce capacity, and utilizing alternative health professionals to manage wait times and systemic pressures.

Are you interested in how these policies might affect prescription costs or other household support schemes?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

Navigating fluctuating rostered hours and tight budgeting when living costs bite makes accessing primary healthcare a pressing concern. For the 2026 general election, political parties have put forward distinct approaches to addressing GP affordability, workforce shortages, and primary care access.

Here is an overview of what the major and notable parties are proposing regarding GP costs and primary care access:

Party Proposals on GP Costs and Access

  • Labour Party: Proposes an "Affordable Healthcare / Medicard" plan. This policy aims to provide every New Zealander with three free GP visits a year. It is tied alongside proposals to remove prescription fees and expand free screening programs. Labour plans to fund these primary care measures through a targeted capital gains tax on commercial and residential investment properties (excluding the family home and farms). They also propose a Family Doctor Loan Scheme to support local GP practices in staying open and operating in local communities.

  • ACT New Zealand: Focuses primarily on workforce stability and capacity rather than universal free visits. ACT has proposed a $400 million funding boost targeted at retaining existing general practitioners in New Zealand and actively attracting more medical professionals from overseas. The core argument is that lowering costs is secondary to ensuring clinics have enough doctors to see patients and prevent long wait times.

  • New Zealand First / National / Green Party / Others: While parties have distinct broader health priorities—such as the Greens focusing heavily on implementing universal free dental care, NZ First emphasizing preventative and metabolic health education, and National focusing on managing clinical waitlist targets and health infrastructure—direct universal or targeted subsidies for standard GP visits feature less prominently in their core platforms compared to Labour's Medicard proposal or ACT's workforce funding injection.

Key Considerations and Debates

  • Workforce Capacity vs. Cost: Medical experts and health commentators, such as representatives from the New Zealand Medical Journal, have highlighted a key operational question regarding policies that promise free or cheaper GP visits: Can the physical workforce deliver it? Critics and sector leaders point out that making visits free increases demand, which requires a robust, well-staffed primary care workforce to avoid longer booking delays or burnout among remaining GPs.

  • Funding Mechanisms: Parties differ sharply on how to pay for healthcare enhancements—ranging from Labour's proposed property-related capital gains tax to general budgetary allocations and targeted workforce retention funds.

You can read a detailed analysis of how these primary healthcare promises stack up against practical system capacity in the RNZ Health Report. Can the health system deliver parties' election promises?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I rent with my partner and work rostered hours that change from week to week. Our pay can drop unexpectedly, but rent and bills don't. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What are parties proposing about GP costs and access for working people who struggle to afford an appointment?

AI Overview

With the 2026 New Zealand general election approaching, the main political parties are presenting fundamentally different approaches to managing GP costs and improving healthcare access. For households navigating changing shift work or unpredictable weekly pay, the debate largely splits between universal free care models to remove upfront cost stress and targeted investment models aimed at expanding clinic capacity and lowering wait times.

A direct comparison of what major parties are proposing for the upcoming election cycle highlights their core health strategies:

Party Proposed GP Cost Changes Proposed Access & Workforce Support
Labour 3 free GP or nurse visits a year via a new "Medicard" system; universal free prescriptions. "Family Doctor Loan Scheme" to help doctors buy into owner-operated practices; clinical triage and technology to free up 4.5 million appointments yearly.
The Greens Fully unlimited free GP visits and free dental care for everyone, funded by a wealth tax. Establish community care clinics in high-need areas first; expand mobile clinics and fund full primary care nurse pay parity.
National Focuses on targeted subsidies over universal free care; continues funding for current Community Services Card holders and those under 13. Rejects universal free visits to avoid system congestion; prefers direct funding into primary care capacity and expanding the roles of pharmacists to handle minor ailments.
ACT Opposes universal free care under a "government-as-purchaser" model. Proposes $400M in health funding to address the "supply side" and doctor shortages; previously suggested private health incentives.
NZ First Focuses heavily on preventative care over structural cost changes. Focuses on a 15-point health plan to reduce GP administrative work; introduces health coaches to take pressure off doctors.

Summary of Core Ideas

  • Universal and Free-Focussed Relief (Left/Center-Left): Parties like Labour and The Greens believe that removing the immediate cost barrier is crucial so working people do not delay care when their budgets are tight. Critics of this model argue it risks driving up demand on an already congested system without immediately putting more doctors on the ground.

  • Capacity and Targeted Relief (Right/Center-Right): Parties like National and ACT argue that making visits universally free provides subsidies to higher-income earners who do not need them. They propose keeping subsidies targeted to low-income and card holders, focusing instead on growing the medical workforce, expanding pharmacist capabilities, and cutting wait times so appointments are actually available when needed.

If you would like to explore this further, I can provide more details on how these changes would be funded or look into what the parties are proposing regarding renters' rights and housing costs to help you weigh your options for the election.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account