Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I don't know which party to choose. How can I compare them without you guessing what I believe?

You don't need to know which party you support before you start comparing them. In fact, it's better not to.

A good way to approach the 2026 New Zealand general election is to work out what matters to you, understand what each party is proposing, and then decide which differences you're comfortable with.

I can help you do that without:

  • Assuming your political views.
  • Steering you towards a particular party.
  • Treating one party's promises as automatically better than another's.
  • Using complicated political language without explaining it.
  • Making the decision for you.

Think of this as comparing options before making an important decision, rather than taking a political quiz that tells you what to believe.

1. First, understand what you're voting for

New Zealand uses a voting system called MMP (Mixed Member Proportional).

At a general election, you normally get two votes:

  • Party vote: You choose the political party you want represented in Parliament. This is the more influential vote in determining how many seats each party receives.
  • Electorate vote: You choose the person you want to represent your local electorate.

You can vote for a candidate from one party and give your party vote to a different party. You don't have to choose the same party for both.

This distinction is important because you might like a local candidate but prefer another party's overall policies.

2. Compare parties using the same questions

Rather than starting with party leaders or political personalities, start with the issues and policies.

Here are some useful areas to investigate. These are prompts, not assumptions about what you should care about.

Issue Questions to ask
Cost of living What would the party do about everyday expenses?
Housing How would it make housing more affordable or accessible?
Healthcare What would it change about hospitals, doctors and waiting times?
Education What would it prioritise in schools and training?
Jobs and the economy How would it encourage employment, wages and economic growth?
Tax Who would pay more or less tax under its proposals?
Environment What would it do about climate change, pollution and conservation?
Crime and justice How would it approach policing, sentencing and rehabilitation?
Māori and Treaty issues What approach would it take to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and Māori rights?
Immigration What would it change about who can come to New Zealand and under what conditions?

You don't need to care equally about all these issues.

For example, healthcare might be extremely important to one voter, while another might put more weight on housing, taxation or environmental protection. Neither approach is automatically right or wrong.

3. Look beyond attractive campaign promises

This is one of the most important skills when comparing political parties.

A party might promise to reduce taxes, increase healthcare funding and improve housing affordability. Those sound appealing, but you need to understand what the proposals actually involve.

For every policy, ask five questions:

  1. What exactly are they promising? Is there a specific change, or just a general statement about wanting things to improve?
  2. How will they do it? Is there a practical plan?
  3. How much will it cost? Is the funding explained?
  4. Who benefits, and who might lose out? Policies often involve trade-offs.
  5. Can they actually deliver it? Does the party have the authority, resources and likely support in Parliament?

For example, consider a hypothetical promise to reduce income tax.

You might investigate:

  • How much would different income groups save?
  • Would government revenue decrease?
  • Would spending on public services change?
  • Would other taxes or charges increase?
  • Is the proposal fully costed?

You don't have to become an economist. You just need to understand the likely consequences.

4. Use sources that let you check the facts

I would suggest three starting points.

Huge news: The best voting tool in NZ is back | The Spinoff

  1. Policy.nz

Best starting point for comparing policies

A useful independent election guide that brings party policies, candidates and issues together.

You can compare parties on the same subjects and follow links to their original policy sources.

Explore the 2026 election guide

Download resources  | Elections NZ

  1. Vote NZ

Official election information

Use this for registered parties, candidate lists, voting arrangements and information about how the election works.

Visit the official election information

The Beehive Parliament Building in Wellington, New Zealand

  1. New Zealand Parliament

Use Parliament's website to understand what MPs do, how laws are passed and how governments operate.

Explore Parliament's website

One useful distinction: Policy.nz says its policy summaries draw on official party websites, policy documents, announcements and other public sources. It is updated regularly, but it is still a summary, not a substitute for checking the original policy. About - NZ Election 2026Policy.nz

5. Give each party a fair comparison

Once you've identified the issues you care about, use a simple comparison table.

For each issue, record:

  • What Party A proposes.
  • What Party B proposes.
  • What Party C proposes.
  • What you like or dislike about each proposal.
  • Anything you still don't understand.

You can also use three simple ratings:

Rating Meaning
Good fit I generally support this approach.
Unsure I need more information.
Poor fit I disagree with this approach.

Importantly, don't give a party a good rating just because you like one of its policies. Look at the whole picture.

6. Remember that parties may need to work together

Under MMP, the party with the most votes doesn't automatically get to govern by itself.

Parties often negotiate with other parties to form a government. This means:

  • A party might have to compromise on some of its policies.
  • Smaller parties can have considerable influence.
  • A party's preferred policies aren't necessarily what a future government will implement.

It's worth asking which other parties a party might realistically work with, and what compromises could follow. What is MMP?New Zealand’s 10th MMP General Election

7. A practical way we can work through this together

I'd suggest doing this in stages rather than overwhelming you with 17 party profiles at once.

  1. Stage 1 – Understand your priorities

    I'll help you explore the issues that matter to you, without assuming what your answers will be.

  2. Stage 2 – Understand the parties

    We'll examine the 2026 policies of the parties contesting the election, explaining unfamiliar terms in everyday language.

  3. Stage 3 – Compare their proposals

    We'll put their positions side by side, including costs, potential benefits, disadvantages and uncertainties.

  4. Stage 4 – Consider your options

    We'll identify which parties appear closest to your stated priorities, where they differ and what you might want to investigate further.

  5. Stage 5 – Make your own decision

    I'll help you understand your options, but the final choice will be yours.

Let's start with one question

I don't want to give you a political questionnaire that boxes you into a particular ideology.

Instead, I'd like to ask:

When you think about the future of New Zealand over the next three years, what would you most like to see improve?

You can tell me in your own words. You might mention things like:

  • Making everyday life more affordable.
  • Better healthcare.
  • More opportunities for younger people.
  • Better education.
  • More secure jobs and a stronger economy.
  • Affordable housing.
  • Protecting the environment.
  • Safer communities.
  • Something completely different.
  • Or simply, "I'm not sure yet."

There are no wrong answers.

One practical date to keep in mind: the 2026 general election is on Saturday 7 November, and advance voting is already open. The enrolment deadline for this election was 25 October, so if you haven't enrolled yet, check the official Vote NZ information. Key dates for 2026 General Election2026 General Election

My aim is to help you reach a decision you understand and feel confident about, rather than tell you which political party you should support.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I don't know which party to choose. How can I compare them without you guessing what I believe?

It is completely normal to feel overwhelmed by political jargon, especially when voting for the first time. You deserve clear, straightforward information without anyone making assumptions about what matters to you.

To compare the parties fairly without an AI guessing your beliefs, you can use independent, non-partisan New Zealand tools designed to translate complex policy into plain English.


1. Interactive Matching Tools (Quiz-Style)

If you want a tool that does the heavy lifting by matching what you care about against what the parties promise, you can use interactive quizzes. They ask you questions about everyday issues (like healthcare, housing, or the cost of living) and show you where your views align:

  • Vote Compass (via 1News / Vox Pop Labs): A widely trusted, academic-led tool where you answer a series of questions about your stance on public issues to see a personalized alignment dashboard with the political parties.
  • Know Your Part: A specialized 2026 non-partisan comparison tool that lets you pick only the specific topics you care about (such as household pressures or economic relief) and skip anything else.

2. Direct Policy Browsing (Side-by-Side)

If you prefer to look at the facts yourself rather than taking a quiz, you can check out independent platforms that break down party manifestos into plain language:

  • Policy.nz: A comprehensive, independent guide that lets you look up specific topics (like education, climate, or tax) and see direct, side-by-side comparisons of what every political party proposes to do.
  • Polatix NZ: Another helpful 2026 election comparison hub that lays out party positions and tracks what different MPs and parties are promising.

How to approach your choice step-by-step:

  1. Identify your top 1 or 2 priorities: Think about what affects your day-to-day life or what you care about most right now (for example: rent/housing costs, the health system, education, or jobs). You don’t need to have an opinion on everything.
  2. Look up those specific issues: Use a site like Policy.nz to search just that one topic. Read what the different parties plan to do in plain terms.
  3. Check the "Party Vote" vs. "Electorate Vote": In New Zealand's MMP voting system, remember you have two main votes:
    • The Party Vote is usually the most powerful way to shape the overall makeup of Parliament because it decides the total share of seats each party gets.
    • The Electorate Vote chooses the specific MP who will represent your local area.

Would you like me to explain how New Zealand’s MMP voting system works in plain English, or help you figure out how to navigate one of these tools?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. I don't know which party to choose. How can I compare them without you guessing what I believe?

Comparing political parties for the first time without leaning on jargon or having assumptions made about your views is entirely doable. Instead of relying on a third party to interpret what you care about, you can use structured, neutral tools and direct primary sources that let your own priorities drive the comparison.

1. Interactive Policy and Value Matchers

  • Vote Compass (run in partnership with 1News) is an academic tool developed by political scientists. It allows you to anonymously answer a series of questions about your stance on various social, economic, and environmental issues. It then plots your positions relative to the registered political parties based strictly on your input data.

  • NZ Policy Hub provides non-partisan interactive summaries and comparisons of different party policies on key national issues.

2. Official Electoral Information

  • Vote NZ is the official site run by the Electoral Commission. It details the mechanics of how your vote works (explaining both your party vote and electorate vote clearly) and lists all registered political parties and their confirmed candidates without commentary or spin.

3. Direct Source Comparison (Reading the Manifestos)

If you prefer to bypass summaries entirely, you can go straight to the source documents that parties publish, commonly called manifestos or policies :

  • Pick two or three specific topics that genuinely matter to you in your daily life (such as healthcare, housing costs, education, or taxes).

  • Visit the official websites of the major parties (e.g., New Zealand Labour Party, New Zealand National Party, Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand, ACT New Zealand, New Zealand First, Te Pāti Māori).

  • Look for their "Policy" or "Manifesto" sections. Reading just the summary bullet points for your specific issue area lets you see what they promise to do in their own words, completely unfiltered.

4. Public Debates and Candidate-Led Forums

  • Watching or listening to televised leader debates or local electorate candidate meetings gives you a chance to see how representatives respond to direct questions and challenge one another's positions in real time. Local community newspapers and public broadcaster sites (like RNZ and 1News) archive these specifically for voter education.
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account