Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What party policies would help people on a fixed benefit afford food, housing and power?

For someone living with a long-term health condition and relying on a fixed benefit, there are several important issues to examine before voting in New Zealand's 2026 general election.

I would focus on policies that make a practical difference to your weekly disposable income: what remains after paying rent, food, electricity, healthcare and transport to medical appointments.

It is also worth looking beyond promises to increase benefits. Policies affecting eligibility, supplementary assistance, rent costs, power prices and access to healthcare can make a substantial difference to your financial security.

Here is a comparison framework that will help you assess the parties on those issues without assuming that any one party is the right choice.

1. The policies that matter most

I would assess each party against six areas.

Policy area What to look for
Benefit income Increasing main benefit rates in line with actual living costs
Disability support Payments that cover additional costs caused by disability or illness
Housing Higher Accommodation Supplement, more public housing and affordable rents
Food Lower grocery costs and targeted food assistance
Electricity Power bill assistance, affordable energy and winter support
Healthcare Affordable GP visits, prescriptions, specialist appointments and transport

One particularly important issue is whether disability-related assistance depends on your relationship status. A policy that recognises your actual disability costs, rather than assuming a partner can support you, could make a substantial difference.

2. What the main parties are proposing

The following reflects policies and announcements available around 30 October 2026. Some parties have released more detailed policies than others, and these are campaign commitments rather than guaranteed outcomes.

Green Party

Income support and disability policy

The Greens have proposed:

  • Increasing main benefit rates to a liveable income.
  • Ensuring supplementary benefits are sufficient.
  • Providing timely, accessible income support for disability-related living and medical costs, regardless of relationship status or the cause of disability.
  • Removing AI from decisions about cancelling or suspending welfare payments and imposing sanctions.
  • Establishing a legal right to a guaranteed minimum income.
  • Improving access to safe, accessible and affordable housing.

Why this matters: These proposals address both the amount of money you receive and the extra expenses associated with living with a disability or long-term health condition.

The disability-related payment proposal is particularly relevant to investigate further, including what expenses would qualify and how much assistance would be available. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

Labour Party

Healthcare and household costs

Labour's 2026 cost-of-living programme includes:

  • Three free GP visits per person each year through a proposed Medicard, from July 2028.
  • Removing the $5 prescription charge from July 2027.
  • Government-backed, low-interest loans for solar panels and batteries.
  • Up to $3,000 additional support for low- and middle-income households installing solar.
  • Making electricity overcharging illegal, with repayments for customers who have been overcharged.
  • Measures to increase supermarket competition and address price gouging.

Why this matters: Free GP visits and prescriptions could reduce recurring medical expenses. Power assistance could also help, although solar loans are less useful to someone who rents or cannot afford additional borrowing.

An important distinction: Labour's published cost-of-living package does not, by itself, establish a general increase in the main benefit rate. Labour's Cost of Living Plan

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Guaranteed basic income approach

TOP proposes a Citizens' Income:

  • Up to $370 per adult per week.
  • Replacing most existing benefits, including Jobseeker Support and Supported Living Payment.
  • Additional top-up assistance for disabled people, parents and superannuitants.

Why this matters: A regular payment that is less dependent on employment status could provide greater income security.

However, there is a critical question for someone receiving a disability-related benefit: how much would the disability top-up be, and would the combined payment leave you better off than your existing benefit and supplementary assistance?

You would want to check how it treats Accommodation Supplement, Disability Allowance and Temporary Additional Support before assessing the proposal. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

National Party

Economic and welfare settings

National's published 2026 policies include:

  • Maintaining a welfare system focused on employment and affordability for taxpayers.
  • A commitment to no new taxes.
  • An energy plan intended to improve electricity affordability and security.
  • More grocery competition, including pursuing separation of New World and PAK'nSAVE.
  • Housing supply measures, including expanded building options.

Why this matters: Its energy and supermarket competition proposals address two of your essential expenses.

However, it is important to examine the details of its welfare policy, particularly how benefit eligibility, sanctions, supplementary payments and disability assistance would work for people who cannot work because of their health.

National's policy platform does not provide the same explicit commitment to a liveable main benefit that the Greens have announced. 2026 Election PolicyElection 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

Te Pāti Māori

Higher benefit payments and individualised support

Te Pāti Māori has announced some substantial income-support proposals:

  • Double baseline benefit levels, aiming for the upper range of the Welfare Expert Advisory Group recommendations.
  • Remove financial penalties, sanctions and work-test obligations.
  • Make benefits individual rather than dependent on relationship status.
  • Increase the amount people can earn before their benefit is reduced.
  • Cancel income-support-related debt owed to the Crown.
  • Ensure additional grants do not have to be repaid.
  • Improve disability services and remove barriers to assessment and funding.
  • Make new government buildings accessible.

Why this matters: Doubling baseline benefits could make a significant difference to someone whose income is currently insufficient for food, rent and electricity. Individualised benefits could also protect people from losing financial independence because of their relationship status.

The practical questions are how the increase would be phased in, how supplementary payments would be treated, and how the policy would be funded. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisDisability Policies of NZ Political Parties

ACT Party

Tighter welfare eligibility and healthcare access

ACT has proposed:

  • Independent medical certification for health-related benefits, using doctors approved by MSD.
  • Reassessment of existing Supported Living Payment and health-related Jobseeker recipients.
  • Long-term arrangements for people with genuine, enduring disabilities or health conditions.
  • An additional $100 million annually for general practice over four years.
  • More services through accredited pharmacies.

Why this matters: Additional GP funding could improve access to appointments.

However, the proposed independent medical assessments are particularly important to consider if you have an established long-term condition. You would want to understand the reassessment criteria, how existing medical evidence is considered and what happens if your benefit is challenged.

ACT says people with enduring conditions would have long-term arrangements, but the details of those arrangements matter. ACT New ZealandElection 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

New Zealand First

Health prevention and household assistance

Its announced policies include:

  • A long-term health strategy called Make NZ Healthy.
  • Greater emphasis on preventative healthcare.
  • Additional support for general practices.
  • A permanent increase to Working for Families tax credits.
  • An annual minimum-wage increase at least in line with inflation.
  • Removing the climate tax on fuel.

Why this matters: Some of these proposals could help households with children and reduce transport-related costs. Its health proposals may also affect access to primary healthcare.

However, the policies identified here do not establish a specific increase to the main benefit for someone receiving Supported Living Payment. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

3. Comparing the policies against your essential expenses

This table summarises the differences in the proposals I've been able to identify.

Party Benefit increases Disability assistance Healthcare costs Housing and energy
Greens Liveable benefit commitment Specific disability-cost support Better basic services Accessible affordable housing
Labour No general increase identified in its cost-of-living package Disability rights and permanent-condition reforms Three free GP visits; free prescriptions Solar assistance and power-price measures
TOP Citizens' Income up to $370 weekly, plus disability top-ups Additional top-ups Not a central feature of the identified proposal Broader income support
National No specific general increase identified Welfare eligibility and employment focus Health investment Energy affordability and housing supply
Te Pāti Māori Double baseline benefits Individualised support and improved disability services Disability and health service improvements Accessible housing
ACT No general increase identified Independent assessments and long-term arrangements Additional GP funding Energy and housing market measures
NZ First No specific general increase identified No comparable detailed proposal identified Preventative healthcare Fuel tax reduction

This is a comparison of identified commitments, not a ranking. Absence of a policy in this summary does not necessarily mean a party has no relevant policy.

4. Important questions about your particular circumstances

There are some less obvious issues I would encourage you to investigate.

Housing affordability

  • Will Accommodation Supplement rates increase?
  • Will there be more accessible public housing?
  • Will renters receive additional protection against rising rents?
  • Will disability-related housing modifications receive more funding?

Food security

  • Will benefit increases reflect the actual cost of groceries?
  • Will GST be removed from basic food?
  • Will emergency food grants become easier to access?
  • Will people be able to receive assistance without accumulating debt?

Electricity affordability

  • Will there be increased winter energy payments?
  • Will low-income households receive cheaper electricity?
  • Will assistance be available to renters, not just homeowners?
  • Will people with additional heating requirements receive extra support?

Medical costs

  • Will regular GP visits become affordable?
  • Will prescription charges be removed?
  • Will specialist appointments and diagnostic tests be easier to access?
  • Will transport costs associated with medical appointments be covered?
  • Will people with permanent conditions be protected from repeated benefit reassessments?

These questions matter because a benefit increase can be offset by rising rent, power and medical costs.

5. Where to check the policies yourself

These independent and official resources are useful for checking the details:

6. My suggested way to approach your voting decision

I would pay particular attention to three things:

  1. Your guaranteed income: What will actually arrive in your bank account each week, including any disability-related payments?
  2. Your essential living costs: Which policies will reduce your rent, groceries and electricity expenses?
  3. Your ability to remain healthy: Which policies will make it possible to attend medical appointments, obtain prescriptions and maintain your health without financial hardship?

One thing I would be especially careful about is comparing headline benefit increases with the total amount of assistance you currently receive. A change to one payment could affect your eligibility for another.

One question that would help me make this comparison more useful

Are you currently receiving Supported Living Payment (SLP) because your health condition prevents you from working, or are you receiving Jobseeker Support with a health-condition exemption?

The distinction matters because some parties' policies specifically affect Supported Living Payment recipients, while others focus on Jobseeker recipients.

I can then put together a more detailed comparison of what the 2026 parties are proposing for someone in your situation, including the potential impact on weekly income, rent, food, electricity and medical expenses.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What party policies would help people on a fixed benefit afford food, housing and power?

Navigating the cost of living on a fixed benefit while managing a long-term health condition and regular medical appointments is a significant challenge. In the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct approaches to addressing food, housing, energy costs, and income support.

The major parties approach these issues through differing economic philosophies—ranging from direct state intervention and benefit increases to supply-side market reforms and spending restraint.


1. Income Support and Benefit Levels

  • The Green Party and Te Pāti Māori: Both advocate for substantial increases to baseline benefit levels. Te Pāti Māori proposes doubling baseline benefits to meet Welfare Expert Advisory Group (WEAG) recommendations, removing financial penalties and sanctions, and individualising benefits so support is not tied to relationship status.
  • Labour: Focuses its cost-of-living package on relieving indirect expenses (such as healthcare and transport) rather than blanket benefit increases, alongside targeted support for low-income households.
  • National and ACT: Focus primarily on work-readiness and welfare compliance. National’s policies include stricter obligations and sanctions for those on Jobseeker support (though medical exemptions typically protect those with long-term sickness or disability benefits like the Supported Living Payment), arguing that fiscal restraint and economic growth are the best paths forward.

2. Food Affordability

  • The Greens, NZ First, and Te Pāti Māori: Propose aggressive market interventions to tackle the supermarket duopoly (Foodstuffs and Woolworths). For example, the Greens propose forcing the major supermarket chains to sell off a substantial portion of their stores into public ownership to create a state-backed chain ("KiwiMart") dedicated to affordability. NZ First similarly proposes structural splits of major grocery cooperatives.
  • National and ACT: Oppose state ownership and market nationalisation. They advocate for boosting competition, easing regulatory and planning barriers, and fostering free-market conditions to naturally drive down food prices.

3. Housing and Rent Relief

Housing is often the largest fixed expense for benefit recipients. Parties are sharply divided on renter protections and state housing:

  • The Greens and Te Pāti Māori: Strongly campaign for renter-focused relief, including a legislative cap on annual rent increases (around 2%), the removal of no-cause evictions, and the establishment of a rental warrant of fitness. They also support major state/public house building programmes (the Greens targeting 40,000 public homes over five years).
  • Labour: Supports stronger renter protections and has committed to expanding social housing (such as building at least 6,000 new social homes over four years).
  • National and ACT: Strongly oppose rent controls, arguing they restrict rental supply and worsen the crisis. National restored no-cause evictions and has scaled back large state-build projects in favour of partnering with community housing providers and implementing planning reforms to free up land for private development.

4. Power and Energy Costs

  • Labour and the Greens: Focus heavily on lowering household power bills. Labour highlights rising energy costs as a core election issue, while the Greens propose splitting energy gentailers and establishing a Crown renewable entity to regain public control over electricity pricing.
  • NZ First: Proposes breaking up the four major energy gentailers to increase market competition and lower consumer power prices.
  • National and ACT: Favor market-led generation and regulatory settings rather than breaking up energy companies or state buy-backs.

5. Healthcare and Medical Transport Access

Because regular medical appointments are essential for your health condition, healthcare policies directly impact your overall cost of living:

  • Labour: Has highlighted policies aimed at reducing health burdens, including free doctor's visits, free prescriptions, and caps on public transport fares (such as a $20 public transport fare cap) which can assist with travel to medical clinics.
  • Other Parties: Focus on varying models of regional health delivery, Māori-led health services (Te Pāti Māori), or administrative streamlining rather than universal free GP care.

Are there specific areas—such as housing stability, power bill relief, or medical/transport costs—that weigh most heavily on your decision-making right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What party policies would help people on a fixed benefit afford food, housing and power?

Navigating life on a fixed benefit while managing a long-term health condition involves balancing essential costs like food, power, and housing against a constrained income. Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand General Election on Saturday, 7 November 2026, New Zealand’s political parties offer distinct approaches to addressing the cost of living, income support, and household expenses.

An overview of major party policy directions relevant to fixed-income support, food affordability, housing, and power costs highlights how different platforms propose to support households:

Income Support and Welfare Settings

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reducing direct household overheads rather than broad benefit level overhauls alone. Their Cost of Living Plan features targeted relief including three free GP visits, free prescriptions, and school lunch expansions (Ka Ora, Ka Ako), which indirectly ease cash pressure on lower-income and beneficiary households.

  • Green Party: Advocates for structural increases to benefit adequacy, arguing that baseline welfare payments need to sit above the official poverty line. They also champion income-alternative frameworks, such as exploring or introducing a guaranteed universal income or livable baseline support.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Focuses on welfare overhaul with an emphasis on whānau-centered support, advocating for increases to baseline benefits, indexation adjustments that reflect actual inflation for low-income households, and targeted financial relief credits aimed at foundational costs like food (kai).

  • National, ACT, and NZ First (Coalition/Centres-Right Perspective): Generally emphasize work-incentive frameworks, active welfare-to-work management, and controlling government spending. Rather than raising baseline benefit levels, their approach to easing the cost of living relies on broad economic management, inflation reduction, tax relief (such as previous tax threshold adjustments), and market competition.


Food Affordability

  • Green Party & Labour Party: Propose active market interventions to address grocery costs. Labour highlights cracking down on supermarket price gouging by structurally separating wholesale supply from retail chains. The Greens have a comprehensive food strategy that includes investigating or supporting alternative competitive models (such as government-backed or social supermarket structures) and making healthy food more accessible while restricting marketing on highly processed alternatives.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for food security through localized food sovereignty initiatives, community food hubs, and tax credits directed toward ensuring access to basic nutritional supplies.

  • National & ACT: Favour market-based solutions and regulatory oversight rather than direct price controls. National has pointed toward structural reviews or recommendations regarding the supermarket duopoly, while ACT generally opposes heavy market intervention, arguing that price-control or break-up mandates can disrupt supply chains or impact local retail networks.


Housing and Rent

  • Green Party & Labour Party: Focus on expanding public and social housing stock significantly, alongside renter protections. The Greens and progressive platforms often advocate for measures such as limiting annual rent increases, implementing a rental warrant of fitness to ensure warm/dry homes, and progressive taxation of land or capital gains to cool housing speculation.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Emphasizes state and kaupapa Māori community housing builds, prioritizing public housing allocation for those in severe housing need, and introducing stronger tenant rights.

  • National, ACT, and NZ First: Focus on increasing overall housing supply through streamlined RMA (Resource Management Act) and planning reforms to free up land for private and multi-unit developments. They emphasize encouraging private landlords and developers to build more houses to naturally moderate rental and purchase prices over time, while opposing strict rent-control caps which they argue can reduce rental availability.


Power and Energy Costs

  • Labour Party & Green Party: Propose household energy-efficiency interventions, such as supporting solar installation initiatives with low- or zero- upfront-cost government-backed schemes to permanently lower household electricity baseline demands. They also support market reviews into the electricity sector to safeguard lower-spending households from sharp price spikes.

  • National & NZ First: Address power prices primarily through supporting diverse energy generation and general market competition, aiming to stabilize generation costs and expand domestic energy capacity without direct price subsidies.

To review individual candidate stances or check your enrolment status before the election, you can visit Elections NZ or compare granular local and party policies side-by-side on Policy.nz.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a long-term health condition that limits my ability to work. I rely on income support and need regular medical appointments. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What party policies would help people on a fixed benefit afford food, housing and power?

AI Overview

For voters managing a long-term health condition on a fixed income, the political parties contesting the 2026 New Zealand general election offer distinct approaches to welfare, healthcare, and cost-of-living relief.

The primary policy platforms addressing welfare benefit rates, medical appointments, food, housing, and power costs across the major parties include:

📊 Direct Policy Comparison

Category 🔴 Labour Party 🟢 Green Party 🔵 National Party
Welfare & Benefit Rates "Double lock" indexation (benefits increase by inflation or wage growth, whichever is higher). Ends annual reviews for permanent disabilities. Guaranteed liveable income for disabled individuals, ensuring sufficient funds for extra costs regardless of living situation. Work-focused welfare model intended to be "firm, fair, and affordable," with a primary emphasis on transitioning work-ready seekers into employment.
Food Costs Promises to ban supermarket price gouging and break up the current duopoly to enforce fairer grocery pricing. Focuses on fair economy and zero-waste circular resource systems to stabilize essential goods. Opposes direct supermarket intervention, prioritizing general inflation reduction to drop prices.
Medical & Health Costs Offers 3 free GP visits per year via a new "Medicard" system, alongside free prescriptions. Guarantees adequate funding for medical/healthcare costs for disabled people and increased funding for primary care. Focuses heavily on infrastructure, elective procedures, and Pharmac funding (+$604M) to secure new medicines.
Housing Support Pledges to build at least 6,000 additional social housing places over four years and regulate property managers. Supports adding at least 6,000 social housing places and expanding affordable state rentals. Focuses on 5% first-home deposits and easing the building consent system to increase general housing supply.
Power Bills & Energy Focuses on a "Solar Saver" scheme to cut upfront solar costs and a structural review of the electricity market within 100 days. Prioritizes renewable independence and sustainable public energy infrastructure ("Kiwipower"). Prioritizes energy infrastructure development via their "Electrify NZ 2.0" plan to boost energy security.

🔍 Key Takeaways for Your Situation

  • If your priority is direct financial relief for medical care and structural changes to benefit growth , the Labour Party Policies target day-to-day out-of-pocket health costs (free prescriptions and limited free GP visits) and seek to protect the purchasing power of your benefit against wage stagnation.

  • If your priority is a systemic overhaul of disability income security , the Green Party Manifesto aims to decouple support from who you live with and establish dedicated funding pathways to cover the baseline extra costs of managing a health condition.

  • If your focus is on broader economic stabilization and reducing the tax burden , the National Party Policies focus on wider market corrections, boosting the healthcare frontline via Pharmac, and tightening obligations on those classified as work-ready.

If you would like to explore further, we can look closer at how each party plans to fund these changes or examine additional policies from minor parties like ACT or Te Pāti Māori. Which area would you like to narrow down?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account