Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

New Zealand 2026 election: what could happen to your council rates?

As a retired homeowner relying mainly on NZ Super, it is worth separating two things when considering election policies:

  1. What central government can change: the laws, funding arrangements, taxes, grants and restrictions that determine how councils operate and pay for infrastructure.
  2. What your local council controls: the actual rates it sets, the services it provides and many of the spending decisions that affect your household.

The important point is that a national election can change the rules governing local rates, but it does not automatically determine how much you will pay on your individual rates bill.

Let's look at the distinction, particularly for homeowners on fixed incomes.

1. The biggest direct rates policy: National's proposed rates cap

The National Party has published a specific policy called Keeping rates affordable.

Its proposal is to:

  • Keep annual council rates increases within an initial target range of 2% to 4%.
  • Establish an independent regulator to oversee councils' compliance.
  • Allow exceptions for exceptional circumstances, such as natural disasters, and certain cases where councils can demonstrate prudent financial management.
  • Introduce the full requirements from 1 July 2029.

The proposal is intended to make rates increases more predictable and limit large annual increases. Keeping rates affordableGovernment to cap rates

There is an important legislative distinction: the Rates Capping Bill was introduced in August 2026 and has passed its first reading. It should not be confused with a fully implemented rates cap. The proposed timetable is for councils to have regard to the target range in 2027/28 and 2028/29, with compliance from 1 July 2029, assuming the legislation proceeds as planned. Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment BillProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

What would a 2–4% cap mean for your household?

For illustration, suppose your annual rates bill is $4,000.

Annual increase New annual bill Extra per year
2% $4,080 $80
4% $4,160 $160
8% $4,320 $320
10% $4,400 $400

Illustrative calculations, not forecasts of actual council bills.

There are three important qualifications:

  1. The proposal concerns a calculated average rates price per rating unit, not necessarily the exact increase on every individual property.
  2. Water-related charges, including drinking water, wastewater and stormwater, are excluded from the proposed cap.
  3. A cap does not necessarily mean your rates bill will fall. It limits the rate of increase covered by the legislation.

Local Government (Rates Capping) Amendment BillProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

This distinction matters because your total council-related costs could still rise even if the capped portion increases by only 2–4%.

2. What would remain in the hands of councils?

Even with a national rates cap, councils would retain substantial decision-making powers.

Decision Who would generally decide?
Annual rates bill and rating structure Local council, within national rules
General rates and targeted rates Local council
Spending on roads and footpaths Local council
Parks, libraries and recreational facilities Local council
Rubbish and recycling services Local council
Local infrastructure priorities Local council
Local development and growth planning Local council, within national legislation
Water infrastructure and associated charges Council or relevant water-service provider, under separate national rules
Rates cap framework and exemptions Central government and regulator

Councils prepare long-term plans, annual budgets and funding policies. They consult communities on major decisions and formally set their rates each year. How councils workSetting rates: Potential issues for councils to watch forProposed rates capping system - Our work - Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport

An important practical consequence: if a council has rising infrastructure costs but cannot increase its capped rates revenue sufficiently, it may have to consider other funding, reduce or postpone some spending, or seek an exemption where eligible.

The cap does not automatically make road repairs, water services, rubbish collection or other council services cheaper to provide.

3. How do other major parties' policies compare?

The distinction is between a policy that directly regulates council rates and policies that reduce other household expenses.

Based on published 2026 election policies:

Party Relevant published policy Potential household effect
National 2–4% rates target range Seeks to limit increases in the covered portion of rates from 2029.
Labour Cost-of-living and healthcare measures More direct help with some everyday expenses, but its published headline policies do not establish the same specific rates cap.
ACT, Greens and NZ First Other local-government and economic policy positions Their detailed proposals should be checked individually before assuming they would retain, change or replace the rates-cap framework.

Labour's 2026 policies include:

  • Three free GP visits each year through its proposed Medicard.
  • Removal of the $5 prescription charge.
  • Public transport weekly fare caps.
  • A three-year fuel excise tax freeze.

These measures could help with some of your other household expenses, although they do not directly reduce council rates. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesMake a Plan

For comparison, National has also published a policy to return a growing share of International Visitor Levy revenue to councils, potentially giving councils another source of funding besides rates. 2026 Election Policy

You can examine the parties' published positions here:

I would distinguish between a party's actual published commitment and something it might do if elected.

4. What does this mean for someone living on NZ Super?

There are several separate financial issues worth watching.

A. Rates rebates

New Zealand has a government-funded Rates Rebate Scheme for eligible low-income homeowners and ratepayers.

Depending on your income, rates and circumstances, you may qualify for assistance.

It is worth checking your eligibility even if you own your home outright and receive NZ Super.

The rates rebate is separate from any proposed rates cap. A cap does not replace the need for targeted assistance to people who struggle to pay their rates.

You can investigate this through the Government Rates Rebate Scheme.

B. Insurance

A council rates cap would not directly restrict:

  • Home insurance premiums.
  • Contents insurance.
  • Insurance excesses.
  • Insurance costs associated with natural disasters.

These are separate costs, influenced by insurers, claims, rebuilding costs and natural-hazard risks.

C. Electricity

Council rates policies do not directly control your electricity retailer's prices.

Government energy policies can affect the electricity market, but your actual bill will also depend on your retailer, tariff, usage and network charges.

D. Healthcare

Council rates policies do not determine your GP fees, prescription costs or access to publicly funded hospital treatment.

These are principally national government responsibilities.

For someone who needs regular healthcare, the parties' health funding and prescription policies may therefore be just as important to examine as their rates policies.

5. Five questions worth asking before you vote

I would use these questions to examine each party's policies objectively:

  1. Rates increases: Will the party limit annual increases, and will the limit include water charges?
  2. Rates rebates: Will it increase assistance for retired homeowners on NZ Super?
  3. Council services: Could rates restrictions lead to reduced services or delayed infrastructure maintenance?
  4. Insurance and natural disasters: How will it address the increasing cost of insuring homes and funding disaster recovery?
  5. Healthcare: What will it do about GP fees, prescription charges and access to regular medical care?

These questions help distinguish between reducing the headline rates increase and genuinely reducing your overall cost of living.

6. My overall assessment of what you should watch

There are three different outcomes to keep separate:

  • Lower rates increases: A national rates cap could provide greater predictability for the covered portion of your rates.
  • Lower total household expenses: This requires policies addressing insurance, electricity, healthcare and other bills as well.
  • Maintaining local services: Restricting council revenue does not remove the need to pay for infrastructure, repairs and essential services.

A policy that limits rates increases might help your annual budget, but the other side of the equation is whether councils can maintain the services and infrastructure your home and community depend on.

One particularly important point: as a homeowner on NZ Super, you should examine both universal cost-of-living policies and targeted support for older homeowners. They are not interchangeable.

For further comparison, the most useful next step would be to look at the actual rates rebate available to you alongside the proposed rates cap, because that would show how much assistance might be available independently of which party forms the next government.


Worked for 9s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searched 6 websites

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

As a retired New Zealand homeowner relying mainly on NZ Super, managing fixed costs like local authority rates is a major consideration.

National Party policy proposals introduce direct central government intervention into local government finance, aiming to rein in what has been a period of sharp rates increases.


What National Party Policies Could Change About Local Rates

  • Introduction of a Rates Cap: National's policy framework includes establishing a statutory cap on annual local authority rates increases, targeting an initial range of 2% to 4%.
  • Timeline for Implementation: Councils are expected to factor this target range into their Long-Term Plans, with the formal caps taking full legal effect by July 1, 2029 (backed by an independent regulator to monitor compliance and manage exemption applications).
  • Focus on "Core Services": The policy explicitly pushes councils to narrow their spending scopes away from non-essential projects and "nice-to-haves" back toward core infrastructure and services, intending to curb the pressure driving double-digit yearly increases.
  • Exclusion of Water Services: Water services infrastructure is structured to be regulated separately and is excluded from this specific rates-capping framework.

What Would Still Be Decided by Councils

Even with central government limits on the percentage increase of rates, local councils retain autonomy and responsibility over several fundamental decisions:

  • The Underlying Valuation Base and Capital Value: Councils independently set how rates are distributed across properties in their district (e.g., using land value vs. capital value systems) through their individual rating policies.
  • Overall Service Levels and Local Priorities: Councils decide the baseline standard for local amenities such as libraries, local parks, community halls, swimming pools, and local roading maintenance. If a council faces a strict rates cap, it must decide internally which community services to scale back, defer, or manage more efficiently.
  • Local Infrastructure and Capital Expenditure Choices: While water services and major projects often operate under separate legislative and regulatory frameworks (and potential central funding partnerships), individual councils still decide the timing, scale, and delivery of regional assets.
  • Community Consultation: Councils remain legally required to consult directly with their local ratepayers and residents on their annual budgets, prioritisation choices, and how they balance their books within the central guidelines.

Would you like to explore how other party platforms approach fixed household costs, or examine how other aspects of your budget (like healthcare access or power bills) align with current policy debates?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

For a retired homeowner relying mainly on NZ Super, navigating rising rates, power, and healthcare costs is a central budget concern.

The National Party's policy approach introduces specific central government controls over local authority rates, while leaving the core mechanisms of local governance and spending decisions with individual councils.


What National Party Policy Changes About Local Rates

The National Party announced a policy to place central government controls on local authority rates increases:

  • Rates Increase Cap: Under this legislation, the government moves to cap annual council rates increases within an initial target range of 2% to 4%.

  • Intent for Household Budgets: The stated goal of the cap is to ease cost-of-living pressures on households and small businesses by preventing steep, unexpected rates spikes (which have seen high median increases nationwide in recent years).

  • Limited Exemptions: Councils would only be allowed to exceed the cap in strictly limited, exceptional circumstances—such as recovering from a major natural disaster or other extreme events outside their direct control. These exemptions are designed to require strong justification and are not granted lightly.

  • "Back to Basics" Focus: The policy aims to refocus councils on core service delivery (such as roads/potholes, rubbish collection, and local community facilities) rather than expanding spending into non-essential areas.


What is Still Decided by Local Councils

Despite central government caps or targets on rate increases, local authorities retain autonomy and decision-making power over several key areas:

  • Core Operational Budgets and Spending Priorities: Councils still decide how to allocate their constrained budgets within the capped limits. They prioritize which local roads get fixed, how rubbish collection is managed, and how local parks, libraries, and pools are funded and operated.

  • The Valuation and Rating Base: Councils independently manage property revaluations (via independent rating valuers) and determine the structure of their rating system—such as how the rates burden is shared between residential, commercial, and rural properties, or through targeted rates for specific local infrastructure.

  • Service Levels and Community Consultation: Decisions around maintaining, upgrading, or scaling back local services, community amenities, and regional infrastructure are still mapped out through Long-Term Plans (LTPs) and Annual Plans, which involve direct local community consultation.

  • Non-Rates Revenue Streams: Councils decide on and set user charges, fees, and consenting costs (such as building consents, resource consents, parking fees, and facility entry fees) to recover costs where caps on general rates constrain their budgets.


Context for Your Wider Budget

While a rates cap aims to provide more predictability for fixed-income households, councils will face difficult choices about either trimming service levels or prioritizing core infrastructure maintenance within those tighter financial boundaries. For your broader concerns regarding healthcare and living costs, you can review details directly on the National Party Policies Page and track local announcements through Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ).

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired, own my home and rely mainly on NZ Super. Rates, insurance and power bills are rising in importance for my budget, and I need regular healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What could national party policies change about local rates, and what would still be decided by councils?

AI Overview

In the lead-up to the 7 November 2026 general election , the National Party has introduced specific policies aimed at restricting local government spending and altering how local councils operate.

The biggest proposed shift is a mandatory cap on council rates, balanced by alternative funding streams and structural changes.


What National Party Policies Would Change About Local Rates

If a National-led government is returned, the central government would directly intervene in how local councils set their rates:

  • A 4% Annual Rates Cap: National has proposed legislation to cap annual council rates increases at a target range of 2% to 4%. This policy aims to protect household budgets from steep, unexpected increases.

  • Redirecting the International Visitor Levy (IVL): To give councils alternative revenue without raising property rates, National plans to share revenue from the $100 International Visitor Levy directly with local councils. The money would be split based on the number of international guest nights a council hosts.

  • Amalgamation and Simplification Requirements: National’s policy requires councils to find internal efficiencies. Under their "Simpler, more cost-effective local government" plan, local councils are required to work together to evaluate shared services, council mergers, or unitary authorities to reduce duplication and save ratepayers money.


What Local Councils Would Still Decide

Despite central government caps, local councils retain autonomy over their internal financial distribution and operational priorities:

  • Individual Property Allocation: The 4% cap restricts the average overall increase a council can levy. Councils still decide how that rates burden is distributed across different categories (residential vs. commercial) and individual properties based on local valuations.

  • The Rates Rebate Scheme Administration: While the central government sets the maximum threshold for the national Rates Rebate Scheme (a vital subsidy for low-income retirees on NZ Super), local councils still process these applications and manage local remission policies for seniors facing financial hardship.

  • Budget Prioritisation (Getting "Back to Basics"): National's policy explicitly intends for councils to focus their remaining budgets on core infrastructure and services, like fixing potholes, waste collection, and maintaining local parks and pools. However, the specific allocation of funds to these tasks remains the choice of your local elected councillors.


Key Trade-offs to Consider

Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) and several local councils have voiced opposition to the 4% cap. They argue that capping rates creates an "unfunded mandate" dilemma , making it difficult for councils to cover the rising costs of asset maintenance, insurance, and emergency repairs without cutting community services.

If you would like to explore how other parties plan to handle local government funding, or if you want information on healthcare or power bill policies for the 2026 election, let me know how you would like to proceed.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account