Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

2026 New Zealand election: support for parents who reduce paid work to care

The key distinction for your situation is between support for your child's learning needs at school and financial support for you as their parent or unpaid carer.

These are related, but they are not the same thing. A party might promise better teacher-aide support without offering additional financial assistance to a parent who has to reduce working hours.

Based on policies and party statements available as at 1 November 2026, there are some meaningful differences between the parties. The clearest proposals for unpaid carers come from the Green Party and The Opportunities Party (TOP). New Zealand First has also expressed support for improving the Child Disability Allowance.

1. What parties propose for parents and unpaid carers

Party Financial support for parents/carers How relevant is it to your situation?
Green Party Supports a Guaranteed Minimum Income, higher benefits, reforming partner-income tests and recognising unpaid care as essential economic work. Strong proposals for improving financial security for unpaid carers.
TOP Proposes a Citizen's Income of up to $370 per week, replacing most existing benefits, with additional support for parents and disabled people. Its disability policy also promises more flexibility for unpaid carers and better respite. Potentially significant direct financial support, although the final carer-specific entitlements need clarification.
New Zealand First Supports reviewing and increasing the Child Disability Allowance, adjusting allowances for inflation and simplifying applications. Particularly relevant to families facing additional costs raising children with special needs.
Te Pāti Māori Recognises unpaid care and whānau support as valuable labour and supports income settings that enable disabled people to live with dignity. Positive recognition of unpaid carers, but less detail on a specific payment to parents.
Labour Has not announced a specific new payment for parents who reduce work to care for a disabled child. Has committed to ending annual benefit renewals for people with verified permanent disabilities. Some improvements to disability support, but no clear new caregiver income entitlement.
National No specific disability-related income reform for carers identified in its current platform. Focuses more on funding disability services and learning support than compensating parents for lost earnings.
ACT Favours individualised disability funding and less bureaucracy, but emphasises tighter benefit obligations and does not propose large benefit increases. Less emphasis on increasing income for parents who reduce paid employment.

Sources: CCS Disability Action's 2026 party questionnaire and election analysis, party policy statements, and Disability Responsiveness NZ's comparison. Election resourcesOpportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

2. The three proposals worth examining most closely

Green Party – recognising unpaid care

The Greens have some of the clearest proposals for recognising the economic contribution of unpaid carers.

Their wider policies include:

  • Moving towards a Guaranteed Minimum Income.
  • Increasing main benefit levels.
  • Reforming or removing partner-income testing that can disadvantage disabled people and their households.
  • Making disability-related living and medical support more accessible, regardless of relationship status or the cause of disability.
  • Treating paid and unpaid care work as important economic infrastructure.

The Greens also propose 15 months of paid parental leave for the primary caregiver, with additional leave for partners. However, that is primarily a policy for parents of babies, rather than parents of school-age children who need ongoing learning support.

Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisDisability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026

TOP – financial security and flexibility for carers

TOP's proposed Citizen's Income is particularly interesting.

It proposes:

  • Up to $370 a week for almost all adults.
  • Replacing most existing benefits, including Jobseeker Support and Supported Living Payment.
  • Additional support for parents and disabled people.
  • Better financial security for unpaid carers.
  • More flexibility to combine paid work with caring.
  • Improved respite services so unpaid carers can take breaks.

Its October 2026 disability statement explicitly says families should not be forced to fill gaps left by an inadequate disability support system.

One important qualification: the $370 is a proposed general income payment, not a confirmed additional $370 carer's payment. The amount of any extra support for carers has not been fully specified.

Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026Policies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

New Zealand First – Child Disability Allowance

NZ First has made a particularly relevant commitment concerning the Child Disability Allowance.

It supports:

  • Reviewing and increasing the allowance.
  • Adjusting allowances for inflation.
  • Making applications simpler.
  • Reducing the financial and emotional strain on parents raising children with special needs.

This is worth investigating because it is directed at families with children, rather than only adults receiving disability benefits.

However, the party's response refers to its previous policy position. It has not provided a detailed new 2026 payment amount or a specific commitment to compensate parents for reduced working hours.

Election resourcesElection resources

3. What about your child's support at school?

This is an important second part of your voting decision. Better school support could reduce the amount of time you need to spend compensating for gaps in the education system.

There are some significant differences here.

  • Labour: Proposes funding an additional 1,000 teacher aides over four years, at a cost of $80 million. This could help provide more individual attention to students who need it.
  • National: Proposes School Start Checks, earlier identification of learning needs and connecting children to Early Intervention Services. It has also invested in Learning Support Coordinators and the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme.
  • Greens: Propose expanding eligibility for learning support and establishing a single agency to coordinate and resource support for students with health and disability needs.
  • NZ First: Has advocated increased Ongoing Resourcing Scheme funding, more Learning Support Coordinators and career pathways for teacher aides.
  • TOP: Supports more funding for teacher aides and specialist learning support.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Supports inclusive education, Māori-led disability services and greater involvement of whānau in decisions.
  • ACT: Focuses on education standards and outcomes, with learning assistance addressed within its broader education approach.

Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisElection resourcesDisability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026Opportunity Disability Position Statement - October 2026

4. What this means for your voting decision

I would distinguish three questions when comparing party policies:

  1. Will I receive financial help if I reduce my working hours?
    The Greens and TOP have the clearest broader income-support proposals. NZ First has a relevant Child Disability Allowance proposal.

  2. Will my child receive enough support at school that I can maintain paid employment?
    Labour, National, the Greens and NZ First have particularly relevant commitments around teacher aides, specialist support and learning support funding.

  3. Will I receive support as an unpaid carer?
    TOP explicitly recognises unpaid carers and proposes greater flexibility and respite. The Greens recognise unpaid care as economically valuable. Te Pāti Māori also recognises unpaid care as valuable labour.

An important gap: I haven't identified a firm, quantified 2026 election commitment from any of these parties to pay a parent a specific weekly carer's wage simply because they have reduced their paid working hours to support a school-age child.

That doesn't mean you cannot qualify for existing assistance. The Child Disability Allowance and Disability Allowance are worth investigating, although eligibility is not automatic just because a child needs additional educational support.

5. My suggested priorities when assessing the parties

Given that your biggest concern is getting appropriate help at school, while avoiding financial disadvantage from caring responsibilities, I'd give particular attention to:

  • The Greens: broader income security and recognition of unpaid care, alongside expanded learning support.
  • TOP: the proposed Citizen's Income and explicit recognition of unpaid carers.
  • NZ First: Child Disability Allowance improvements and ORS funding.
  • Labour: the additional 1,000 teacher aides.
  • National: earlier identification and its existing learning support investment.

These are policy comparisons, not voting recommendations. Some proposals are considerably more developed than others, and several parties have yet to specify eligibility rules, payment amounts or implementation details.

Useful independent resources:

I can also compare the parties specifically on how much financial support a parent could receive if they had to reduce their working week to care for a school-age child, including existing allowances and proposed new payments.


Worked for 12s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searched 5 websites

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

Navigating the education system for a school-age child with additional learning needs while balancing or reducing paid work is a significant challenge. In the context of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties approach this issue through different lenses—focusing either on direct income support for carers and families, or on structural reforms within schools and learning support systems to reduce the burden on parents.


1. Direct Financial Support and Welfare Adjustments

For parents who have to step back from paid employment, financial sustainability is a primary concern. Parties hold differing views on income support and benefits:

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on recognizing unpaid care and whānau support as valuable labor. They advocate for significant benefit increases to a liveable income, raising abatement thresholds so people can earn more before their support is reduced, and making welfare support more accessible without punitive work-test obligations. They also support increasing supplementary assistance, such as the Child Disability Allowance and Disability Allowance.
  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Promotes a broader structural shift through a Citizen’s Income policy—providing a universal baseline payment to adults, with specific top-up supports designed for parents and caregivers to cushion the financial impact of reduced work hours.
  • Labour Party: Generally focuses on strengthening social safety nets, protecting welfare frameworks, and increasing baseline support mechanisms like Working for Families tax credits, alongside rebuilding equitable funding into health and disability support systems.
  • National and ACT: Center their economic policies around tighter work expectations for benefit recipients and fiscal restraint. While they emphasize targeting support to those with medical exemptions, their general approach leans toward moving people back into the workforce through specialized employment pathways rather than expanding long-term income support for out-of-work carers.

2. School-Level Learning Support (Targeting the Root Cause)

Many parent-advocacy groups and political parties argue that the best way to keep parents in paid work is to ensure schools are adequately resourced so that children do not require constant parental intervention or reduced-hours schooling.

  • Green Party & Left-Bloc Parties: Strongly advocate for fully funded inclusive education. This includes expanding the Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS), increasing the number of specialist teachers and teacher aides in mainstream schools, and providing predictable, needs-based funding so children can participate safely without relying on parents to bridge the gap.
  • National and Governing Parties: Focus heavily on core academic metrics, consistency, and structural stability within the education and disability support sectors. Their focus tends to be on nationwide consistency and administrative efficiency rather than sweeping funding expansions for learning support, though policies vary on how teacher-aide and specialist funding allocations are managed.
  • ACT: Tends to favor decentralized education models (such as charter schools) and addresses behavioral and learning disruptions through stricter classroom management policies, arguing that systemic behavioral reforms help normalize the learning environment for all students.

Summary Checklist for Your Vote

When evaluating your vote on this issue, consider asking local candidates or checking party manifestos on these specific points:

  1. Income Relief: Do they support raising or expanding allowances (such as the Child Disability Allowance or abatement thresholds) for parents forced to cut back hours?
  2. Inclusive Education Funding: Do they commit to guaranteed, needs-based learning support funding (teacher aides, specialist therapists) directly inside schools so your child is fully supported during school hours?

Would you like to explore what specific support mechanisms currently exist for families via the Ministry of Education or Work and Income while you navigate your options?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

Navigating the decision to reduce paid work to care for a school-age child with learning support or extra needs is a major balancing act. In the lead-up to the 7 November 2026 New Zealand general election , different political parties approach the intersection of caregiving, income support, and disability/learning assistance through distinct lenses.

An overview of what major parties are proposing or emphasizing regarding income support, caregiving, and learning support reflects several key approaches:

1. Labour Party

  • Disability & Carer Support: Labour has pledged to repeal and replace the recent Disability Support Services legislation with rights-based legislation co-drafted alongside the disability community. They have also committed to ending annual benefit reviews for people with permanent and verifiable disabilities, which provides long-term income stability for families where a parent or child is navigating ongoing support structures.

  • Workforce & Sector Investment: Labour promises an immediate pay rise for care and support workers ($4 per hour) and a commitment to restoring pay equity frameworks, aimed at stabilizing the wider care workforce that families rely on.

  • Focus on Income Security: Focuses heavily on protecting baseline welfare adequacy and removing cumbersome re-qualification hurdles for families dealing with permanent needs.

2. National Party (Incumbent)

  • Legislative and Funding Framework: National points to the passage of the Disability Support Services Act and recent multi-billion-dollar funding injections into Disability Support Services (DSS). Their framework emphasizes stabilizing the system, providing consistent national assessments, and offering choice and control over flexible funding.

  • Family Care Recognition: The legislative framework clarifies the role of families and the Crown’s contribution to supporting disabled individuals, validating family care arrangements, and ensuring service continuity without introducing new asset or income tests.

  • Focus on Economic Management: National’s broader approach to parents reducing work centers on economic management, inflation control, and targeted tax relief rather than broad new benefit expansions for home-based carers.

3. Green Party

  • Systemic Overhaul & Timely Income: The Greens advocate for timely, livable income support and a Te Tiriti-based disability rights framework with enforceable accessibility standards.

  • Learning Support Coordination: For school-age children specifically, the Greens propose expanding access criteria to learning support and establishing a single, unified agency to coordinate and resource supports for students with health and disability needs, aiming to take the navigation burden off parents. They also push for universal free early childhood education (ECE) and expanded school lunch programs (Ka Ora, Ka Ako) to reduce household cost-of-living pressures.

4. The Opportunities Party (TOP) & Other Parties

  • Universal Basic Income (UBI): TOP has promoted a Universal Basic Income model (proposing up to $370 weekly) to replace various individual benefit categories, alongside a universal annual disability allowance ($6,000). This structural shift is designed to automatically support individuals regardless of whether they cycle in and out of paid work to care for family members.

What to Consider for Your Vote

When reviewing party policies against your specific situation as a parent:

  • Direct Income/Carer Support: Look closely at how each party proposes to adjust main benefits, the Supported Living Payment , or carer-specific allowances if you drop below certain working hours.

  • School-Level Learning Support: Much of the daily strain on working parents comes from school-adjacent gaps (such as Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) thresholds or teacher-aide availability). Parties like the Greens explicitly target centralized coordination and expanded criteria, whereas National and Labour focus more heavily on the broader Disability Support Services funding pool and system stabilization.

You can check your current electorate, local candidates' stances, and compare side-by-side party manifestos in detail on platforms like Policy.nz or the official Vote NZ hub.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a school-age child who needs additional learning support. Getting suitable help at school is my main concern, and I sometimes reduce paid work to care for them. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What support do parties propose for parents who cut back paid work to care for a child?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are addressing your concerns through two primary policy avenues: financial support for unpaid carers and boosting in-school learning support so parents do not have to fill structural gaps themselves.

Here is how the major parties propose to support you in balancing work and caring for a school-age child with additional learning needs:

Financial Support for Parents & Carers

If you reduce paid employment to provide care, your financial safety net relies heavily on welfare allowances and caregiver packages.

  • The Green Party: Proposes significant benefit increases and pledges to ensure easily accessible income support to cover all disability-related living costs, regardless of relationship status. They advocate for removing partner income testing for welfare allowances.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Advocates for structural change through a universal Citizens’ Income and a universal $6,000 annual Disability Allowance to directly provide financial security for unpaid carers, alongside a vow to give carers more flexibility to balance jobs and caring.

  • National: Focuses on the financial stabilization of existing systems. However, they have announced plans to consult with stakeholders on an upcoming carers' package.

  • Labour & Te Pāti Māori: Focus heavily on systemic welfare reform. Labour has pledged to end annual benefit renewals for people with permanent verified disabilities to reduce administrative stress, while Te Pāti Māori aims to cancel existing income-support debt owed to the Crown.


In-School Support (Reducing the Need to Cut Work Hours)

Parties are also targeting the root cause of your work reductions by proposing shifts in how schools resource additional learning support.

  • Labour: Has made a cornerstone promise to fund 1,000 extra teacher aides across New Zealand to provide dedicated, individualized classroom support. They also pledge to repeal and rewrite the current government's disability support legislation into a rights-based framework alongside the community.

  • National: Commits to placing learning support coordinators in all schools and increasing teacher aide hours. Their stance focuses on rolling out the New Zealand Disability Strategy 2026–2030 to deliver nationally consistent funding and choices.

  • The Green Party: Proposes to expand the criteria to access learning support and establish a single, dedicated national agency to coordinate and resource all health and disability needs for students.

  • ACT: Promotes individual choice outside of the mainstream state system, funding charter schools (targeting 10,000 enrolments by 2029) to give parents alternative learning environments if traditional schools are failing to accommodate their child's needs.


If you would like to explore these options further, let me know:

  • If you want a closer look at the specific eligibility criteria for current or proposed caregiver allowances.

  • Which specific learning support needs (e.g., neurodivergence, physical disability) you are navigating, so we can check targeted policies.

  • If you want to know more about how charter schools vs. state schools would be funded under different party plans.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account