Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supporting older relatives who live with family rather than in residential care?

Supporting older relatives in multigenerational households: 2026 New Zealand election

For a multigenerational Pacific household, supporting older relatives is about more than aged-care facilities. It can mean making it financially and practically possible for grandparents, parents and other older family members to remain living with their children and grandchildren.

There are four important policy areas to examine when comparing parties:

  1. Household costs: Superannuation, benefits, rates, food, power and financial support for family carers.
  2. Housing and space: Affordable, accessible homes with enough bedrooms, bathrooms and living space for multiple generations.
  3. Healthcare: Affordable GP visits, prescription costs, home-based nursing, disability support and access to specialists.
  4. Family caregiving: Whether relatives who provide unpaid care receive financial assistance, respite care and practical support.

An important distinction is that policies supporting older people generally do not necessarily provide direct support to the families caring for them.

1. What the main parties are proposing

The following comparison reflects policies and party responses available as at 1 November 2026. It focuses on older people living in family homes, rather than assuming residential care is the preferred option.

National

Housing, independence and protection of older people

National's retirement policy includes:

  • Reserving at least 20% of places in the Housing Flexible Fund for affordable housing for older people.
  • Expanding the rules allowing granny flats and making them easier and cheaper to build.
  • Extending the granny-flat rules to tiny homes.
  • Establishing a free 0800 Seniors helpline to help older people access government services.
  • Reviewing protections against elder abuse and financial exploitation.
  • Extending compulsory employer KiwiSaver contributions to working people over 65 from July 2027.

Relevance to your household: The granny-flat policy is particularly relevant if your family wants grandparents to have a separate but nearby living space. It could help with privacy and independence while keeping family members close.

Source: National – Retirement policy.

Labour

Healthcare affordability and care-worker pay

Labour's 2026 proposals include:

  • Three free GP visits per year for everyone through a proposed Medicard.
  • Removing the $5 prescription charge.
  • Restoring pay equity legislation and providing an immediate $4-an-hour pay increase for care and support workers.
  • Investing in additional social housing.
  • Introducing a $20 weekly public transport fare cap.
  • Introducing measures to reduce household energy costs.

Relevance to your household: Free GP visits and prescriptions could reduce the cost of looking after older relatives. Better pay for care workers could also help strengthen the workforce providing professional support in homes and communities.

However, the care-worker pay proposal is not the same as paying a family member who provides unpaid care to an elderly parent or grandparent.

Sources: Labour – 2026 election policies and The Conversation – election policy tracker.

Green Party

Ageing in place, accessible housing and community healthcare

The Greens have proposed:

  • Moving towards free public primary healthcare, including free dental care and prescriptions.
  • Fully implementing the Dementia Mate Wareware Action Plan over five years.
  • Building more accessible public housing.
  • Establishing a state-owned, not-for-profit retirement village scheme.
  • Expanding home insulation and solar support.
  • Supporting community-based care and family carers.

Relevance to your household: The focus on accessible housing, dementia support and community care is particularly relevant if an older relative has mobility difficulties or needs ongoing assistance but wants to remain with family.

The emphasis on family carers is important, although you should check the precise eligibility and payment arrangements for any proposed assistance.

Source: Grey Power – parties' policies for older New Zealanders.

New Zealand First

Aged-care reform and housing for seniors

New Zealand First has proposed:

  • A Seniors Housing Plan.
  • More options for older people to age in place.
  • Better coordination between primary healthcare, community healthcare and aged care.
  • Aged-care reform as a policy priority.
  • Maintaining NZ Super at 66% of the net average wage.

Relevance to your household: Better coordination between healthcare providers and community aged-care services could make it easier for families to look after older relatives at home.

The publicly reported proposals are less specific about direct financial payments to unpaid family caregivers.

Source: Grey Power policy comparison.

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

Community support and long-term healthcare planning

TOP has proposed:

  • A ten-year cross-party Health Plan to improve long-term funding stability.
  • Greater investment in preventative and primary healthcare.
  • Stronger community-based services to help older people remain at home.
  • More support for family carers.
  • Replacing the Accommodation Supplement with a universal housing payment.
  • More social housing and interest-free rates deferral for older homeowners.

Relevance to your household: TOP's emphasis on community healthcare and family-carer support is directly relevant to families providing ongoing care at home. Its housing payment proposal may also be worth examining if housing costs are a significant pressure.

Source: Grey Power – older New Zealanders' policy comparison.

ACT

Information on older people's policy is less complete

ACT did not complete Grey Power's questionnaire on older people's policies. Its position therefore cannot be fairly compared on the same basis.

You would need to examine its published 2026 health, housing, welfare and retirement policies to establish what specific assistance it proposes for unpaid family caregivers.

Source: Grey Power's party questionnaire results.

Te Pāti Māori

Whānau-centred services and disability support

Te Pāti Māori did not respond to Grey Power's older-person questionnaire.

Its reported 2026 policy proposals include:

  • Supporting Māori-led disability services.
  • Making disability support easier to access.
  • Rebuilding the Māori Health Authority.
  • Shifting healthcare towards prevention and community wellbeing.

These proposals may be relevant to families supporting older relatives with disabilities or ongoing health needs. However, they should not be mistaken for a confirmed older-person or unpaid-carer payment policy.

Source: The Conversation – 2026 policy tracker.

2. How the proposals compare against your family's needs

Your concern Policies worth examining
Keeping older relatives at home Greens, TOP, NZ First
Having enough space for generations National's granny flats and tiny homes; Greens' accessible public housing
Reducing healthcare expenses Labour's free GP visits and prescriptions; Greens' free healthcare proposals
Supporting unpaid family carers Greens and TOP explicitly emphasise family-carer support
Making housing affordable National's seniors housing; TOP's housing payment; Greens' public housing
Protecting retirement income All five parties responding to Grey Power support universal NZ Super

One additional point: Labour, the Greens, NZ First and TOP have explicitly committed to retaining the NZ Super eligibility age at 65. National supports universal superannuation but had not confirmed the eligibility age in its Grey Power response. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersNational’s plan for retirement

3. An important gap: who supports the family member doing the caring?

This is probably one of the most important questions for your household.

Imagine a situation where:

  • Grandparents live with their adult children.
  • One adult child reduces their working hours to help care for an elderly parent.
  • The family pays more for food, electricity, transport and housing.
  • The older relative needs help attending medical appointments, preparing meals or managing daily activities.

There are two different kinds of assistance to consider:

A. Support for the older person

  • NZ Super.
  • Subsidised prescriptions and medical appointments.
  • Home-based nursing and personal care.
  • Mobility equipment and disability support.
  • Dementia services.

B. Support for the family caregiver

  • Financial assistance for unpaid caring.
  • Paid leave to look after an older relative.
  • Respite care so caregivers can rest.
  • Counselling and mental health support.
  • Help with additional household costs.

The distinction matters because a pay rise for professional aged-care workers does not automatically help a daughter, son or grandchild who provides unpaid care.

The published comparisons identify Greens and TOP as emphasising family carers, but they do not establish a comprehensive new payment entitlement for every unpaid family caregiver. This is an area where you should seek more detailed answers from the parties. How parties stand on issues affecting older New ZealandersElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

4. Five questions worth asking candidates before voting

For a multigenerational household, I would suggest asking candidates these specific questions:

  1. Family caregiving: Will you introduce a regular financial payment for adult children who reduce their working hours to care for elderly parents or grandparents?

  2. Housing: Will you provide grants, low-interest loans or other assistance to families wanting to build a granny flat or modify their homes for older relatives?

  3. Healthcare: Will older people living with family receive affordable home nursing, physiotherapy, dementia care and subsidised transport to medical appointments?

  4. Respite: Will you fund temporary replacement care so family caregivers can work, attend to their children or take a break?

  5. Household costs: Will you provide additional assistance to households supporting older relatives, particularly when several generations share one income?

5. Where to check the parties' actual commitments

These sources are useful for checking the details rather than relying only on campaign statements:

My suggested focus for your voting decision

I would pay particular attention to three questions:

  • Can your older relatives remain living with family without creating financial hardship?
  • Can your household obtain a home with enough room for children, parents and grandparents?
  • Does the government recognise and support the unpaid work that family members do to care for older relatives?

These are important issues for Pacific families, where caring for older relatives can be a shared family responsibility across generations.

One important question to take into the election: If your family chooses to care for grandparents at home rather than place them in residential care, what concrete financial, housing and healthcare assistance will the next government provide to make that choice sustainable?

That is a question worth putting directly to every party's local candidates, and asking them to identify the actual funding, eligibility rules and implementation dates behind their promises.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supporting older relatives who live with family rather than in residential care?

For Pacific voters and multigenerational households navigating the 2026 New Zealand general election, balancing household costs, space, and healthcare access is a central issue. When looking specifically at how political parties propose to support older relatives living with family rather than moving into residential care, policies generally focus on housing modifications/granny flats, financial support, and community healthcare integration.

Party approaches to supporting intergenerational living and ageing in place include the following:

1. Housing Space and Multigenerational Living (Granny Flats & Papakāinga)

A major bottleneck for multigenerational households is having enough physical space. Parties have put forward distinct proposals to make it easier and cheaper to expand homes for older relatives:

  • National: Has pledged to expand rules around granny flats, tiny homes, and minor dwellings to make them faster and cheaper to build (building on recent consent-free initiatives), alongside a retirement plan targeting low-cost pensioner housing and support for families adding minor dwellings for aging parents.
  • Labour / Te Pāti Māori / Greens: Focus heavily on expanding housing options suitable for intergenerational living, such as building more papakāinga (on Māori land), expanding social housing allocations to prioritize older adults (like kaumātua), and ensuring new government builds incorporate universal design and mobility features.

2. Financial Support and Cost of Living

Supporting older relatives at home places financial pressure on the wider household budget (groceries, power, rates, and medical expenses).

  • Superannuation: Most major parties have committed to protecting New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super) and eligibility ages (though some, like ACT, have proposed raising the super age to 67 by 2035 with compassionate early access for physically demanding care/work roles).
  • Targeted Cost-of-Living Relief: Parties are pitching various tweaks to income support, tax, and rates. For instance, The Opportunities Party (TOP) has proposed policies like interest-free rates deferral for older homeowners and a universal housing/citizen's income framework, while others emphasize Working for Families adjustments or general cost-of-living relief to assist households supporting dependents.

3. Healthcare Access and Aging in Place

Because healthcare access (GPs, prescription costs, and wait times) is a primary concern for older New Zealanders and their families, parties approach community-based health support differently:

  • Primary Care and Aged Care Integration: Parties such as New Zealand First have emphasized aged-care reform and better coordination between primary, community, and aged care to help people stay in their homes safely.
  • Free or Low-Cost Healthcare Initiatives: Several parties (including Labour and the Greens) are campaigning on expanding free or subsidized primary healthcare, lowering screening ages, and reducing prescription or GP visit barriers, which directly aids multigenerational households managing multiple medical needs under one roof.
  • Home Support Workforce: Policies addressing pay equity and funding for care and support workers are critical, as they dictate whether families caring for older relatives at home can access publicly funded home-help support rather than being forced into residential care.

Next Step / Follow-up:
Are you more interested in comparing how specific parties plan to help fund home-modifications (like building a granny flat), or would you like to dive deeper into their respective healthcare and GP access policies?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supporting older relatives who live with family rather than in residential care?

For multigenerational households—which are common within Pacific communities—supporting older relatives to live at home ("ageing in place") intersects with wider party policies on healthcare accessibility, housing adequacy, and cost-of-living relief.

Political party approaches and proposals relevant to supporting older relatives living at home include the following:

  • Green Party: Emphasises supporting older people to age in place by expanding community-based health services and providing direct support for family/informal carers. Their broader health platform includes advocating for free primary healthcare, dental care, and prescriptions, alongside accessible public housing initiatives to help ease overcrowding or accommodate multi-relatives under one roof.

  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Places a strong emphasis on community-based care and support for family carers enabling ageing in place. For household and housing costs, TOP proposes replacing the Accommodation Supplement with a universal housing payment and introducing interest-free rates deferral for older homeowners, which can assist older family members who own or contribute to the family property.

  • New Zealand First: Identifies aged-care reform as a core priority and advocates for a Seniors Housing Plan alongside broadened options for ageing in place. They also support maintaining New Zealand Superannuation settings at 66% of the net average wage, supporting the baseline income of older relatives living within the family unit.

  • Labour Party: Focuses heavily on reducing primary healthcare costs (such as proposing lower-cost or free GP visits like their "Medicard" proposal) and cost-of-living measures like energy and transport cost assistance. More affordable local doctor access directly benefits households managing ongoing health needs for older relatives at home.

  • National Party: Concentrates its approach on broader economic growth, easing overall housing cost pressures (such as rates rebates and accommodation assistance support), and general health system capacity building, though they place less explicit emphasis on dedicated direct allowances for informal family caregivers compared to parties like the Greens or TOP.

You can review further organizational perspectives and details via Grey Power Magazine or check the specific sector alignment via the Aged Care Association.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm a Pacific voter in a multigenerational household with children and older relatives. Our main concerns are household costs, enough space and access to healthcare. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about supporting older relatives who live with family rather than in residential care?

AI Overview

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are addressing the needs of multigenerational households by proposing different ways to support older relatives living at home ("ageing in place") rather than entering residential care. These policies directly target your household's core concerns regarding space, household costs, and healthcare access.


🏡 Creating Enough Space (Housing & Multi-generational Living)

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on reducing construction barriers to allow families to expand their homes. They are expanding "granny flat" regulations to include tiny homes on wheels and empty sections without requiring standard council approvals. This allows families to build extra, independent space for older relatives quickly and affordably.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP): Actively campaigns to enable a wider mix of housing typologies, explicitly supporting funding and zoning changes for co-housing and multi-generational homes.

  • Labour Party & New Zealand First: Focus heavily on general social housing and affordability. Labour pledges to deliver 6,000 additional social housing places , while New Zealand First has proposed a dedicated Seniors Housing Plan to assist older New Zealanders who rent or need stable accommodation.

💰 Easing Household Costs (Financial Support for Carers)

  • The Green Party & TOP: Place a strong emphasis on providing direct financial support for family and whānau carers who look after older relatives at home, reducing the financial strain on the household.

  • Labour Party: Focuses on reducing the burden of care by boosting the workforce that comes into the home. They have promised an immediate $4 per hour pay rise for care and support workers starting January 2027 to ensure families have better access to paid, external home help.

  • National Party: Promises to review the enduring powers of attorney framework and establish a dedicated 0800 seniors helpline to make it easier for families to navigate government financial services and protections.

🏥 Healthcare Access at Home ("Ageing in Place")

  • Labour Party: Focuses on primary care affordability for the whole household through their new Medicard system , which would provide three free GP visits per year, free prescriptions , and free maternity scans. This makes managing health costs significantly cheaper for both your children and older relatives.

  • Green Party: Focuses on moving care away from hospitals and into the community. They want to fund more community-based health services and ensure full pay parity for primary care and community nurses so that older relatives can get high-quality healthcare directly in their neighborhood or home.

  • New Zealand First: Views aged-care reform as a major priority and emphasizes a "bold shift" toward preventative health and nutrition to help older relatives stay healthy and independent at home longer, reducing their reliance on hospitals.

  • National Party: Prioritizes clearing health waiting lists, boosting the frontline health workforce, and increasing the Pharmac budget to make more life-saving medicines available to seniors.

Summary of Party Focus Areas

Party Housing & Space Strategy Cost & Carer Support Healthcare Focus
National Scraps council rules for granny flats & tiny homes 0800 Seniors helpline & protections Pharmac funding boost & workforce growth
Labour 6,000 new social housing places $4/hr pay rise for home care support workers Medicard: 3 free GP visits & free prescriptions
Greens Supports community-funded spaces Direct support & funding for family carers Free dental; localized community healthcare
NZ First Dedicated Seniors Housing Plan General cost-of-living tax reliefs Preventative health & aged care system reform
TOP Low-cost finance for multi-generational homes Universal housing payment reforms 10-year health plan; increases GDP health spend
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account