Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retail and small-business crime, prevention and policing?

For your café, I would look at this election through two connected questions:

  1. Can a government make your premises, staff and customers safer? This includes burglary, ram raids, theft, repeat offending, police response times and crime prevention.
  2. Can it help keep your business financially viable? Lower operating costs and stronger customer spending matter because security measures are another expense when margins are already tight.

There are some quite significant differences between the parties, particularly over whether the answer to retail crime is tougher enforcement and stronger powers, or prevention, rehabilitation and community investment.

The following is a comparison of New Zealand's 2026 election positions, using Retail NZ's election policy tracker, updated party announcements and small-business policy information available as at 1 November 2026.

1. What the parties propose on retail and small-business crime

The central comparison is based on Retail NZ's published retail crime policy tracker.

National

Parliamentary parties - New Zealand Parliament

National Party

Approach: Tougher enforcement, stronger deterrents and more policing.

National supports:

  • Expanding citizens' arrest legislation to allow mechanical restraints.
  • On-the-spot fines for certain retail offending.
  • Increasing maximum trespass notice periods from two to three years.
  • Exploring facial recognition technology to identify repeat offenders.
  • Strengthening powers available to private security guards.
  • Introducing move-on orders to address persistent antisocial behaviour outside businesses.

National also previously committed $480 million over four years to frontline policing and promised 500 additional police officers by the end of 2025.

Its 2026 election programme also proposes a dedicated Auckland Transport Police team, with 50 additional sworn officers for public transport safety.

What this could mean for your café: A stronger enforcement approach, potentially making it easier to deal with repeat offenders and persistent antisocial behaviour. However, some proposals involve changes to legislation and safeguards would matter when considering their practical effect.

Retail Crime2026 Election Policy

Labour

Parliamentary parties - New Zealand Parliament

Labour Party

Approach: Police capacity, crime prevention and safer workplaces.

Labour:

  • Opposes expanding citizens' arrest powers, arguing that untrained retail employees should not be encouraged to physically detain offenders.
  • Has criticised frontline police numbers.
  • Previously funded anti-crime infrastructure, including fog cannons.
  • Had not announced a specific retail crime policy for the 2026 election in Retail NZ's latest detailed assessment.

Labour's wider 2026 business programme includes:

  • A $10,000 instant asset write-off for eligible business investment.
  • Faster payment of small-business invoices.
  • An $80,000 GST threshold proposal.
  • Greater access for small businesses to government contracts.

What this could mean for your café: Labour's approach places more emphasis on avoiding dangerous confrontations between staff and offenders, alongside practical business support. However, there is less specific detail about its 2026 retail crime response.

Retail CrimeLabour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026: What’s on Offer for Small Business?

Green Party

Parliamentary parties - New Zealand Parliament

Green Party

Approach: Prevention, early intervention and community-based solutions.

The Greens strongly oppose:

  • Expanded citizens' arrest powers.
  • New move-on orders.
  • Expanded trespass powers.

Their concerns include:

  • Increased risks of violence when retail workers physically confront offenders.
  • Potential racial profiling and disproportionate impacts on Māori and Pasifika communities.
  • Over-reliance on punitive responses rather than addressing the causes of offending.

The Greens advocate funding community-led crime prevention and early intervention.

Their wider economic approach also includes supporting local business districts, including proposals addressing commercial rents and long-vacant premises.

What this could mean for your café: More emphasis on preventing offending before it happens and addressing underlying social issues. The trade-off is that the party opposes several of the stronger enforcement measures sought by retail businesses.

Retail CrimeElection 2026: What’s on Offer for Small Business?

ACT

File:Logo of the ACT New Zealand.svg - Wikimedia Commons

ACT New Zealand

Strongest enforcement-focused proposals

Approach: Stronger powers for business owners and security personnel, and tougher consequences for repeat offenders.

ACT supports:

  • Expanded citizens' arrest powers.
  • A licensing system giving trained security guards additional powers, including reasonable force and consent-based safety searches.
  • A proposed minimum three-year prison sentence for someone convicted of a third burglary.
  • Early release incentives for prisoners who learn to read, gain trade skills and achieve qualifications.

What this could mean for your café: ACT has some of the most directly relevant proposals for businesses experiencing burglary and repeat offending. Its approach is particularly focused on deterrence and giving trained security personnel greater authority.

An important distinction: stronger powers for trained security guards are not the same as encouraging café owners or ordinary employees to physically intervene.

Retail Crime

New Zealand First

File:New Zealand First logo 2017.svg - Wikimedia Commons

New Zealand First

Approach: Targeting organised crime and the networks behind stolen goods.

New Zealand First's focus includes:

  • Dismantling transnational criminal syndicates.
  • Targeting the black market for stolen retail goods.
  • Tackling illicit tobacco networks.
  • Investing in Customs equipment and personnel to support enforcement.

What this could mean for your café: Its focus is particularly relevant if theft is connected to organised criminal activity or the resale of stolen goods. Its published retail crime proposals are less directly focused on everyday shoplifting or individual burglaries.

New Zealand First has also proposed reducing the company tax rate to 20% for SMEs with turnover below $30 million.

Retail CrimeElection 2026: What’s on Offer for Small Business?

Te Pāti Māori

‘Kei te ū pūmau a Oriini me Hana’ rumours dispelled of further MP departures and what next for Te Tai Tokerau – Te Ao Māori News

Te Pāti Māori

Approach: Prevention, rehabilitation and community-led alternatives.

Te Pāti Māori:

  • Opposes expanded citizens' arrest and trespass powers.
  • Warns that tougher enforcement could disproportionately affect Māori and Pasifika communities.
  • Advocates moving resources away from ineffective imprisonment and towards prevention, rehabilitation and community-led solutions.

What this could mean for your café: A longer-term focus on addressing the causes of crime rather than expanding enforcement powers. There is less detail about specific protections for businesses experiencing burglary.

Retail Crime

The Opportunity Party

The Opportunity Party

Approach: Evidence-based crime reduction.

Opportunity advocates a 'Smart on Crime' approach, supporting investment in evidence-based measures to reduce offending.

Its position is more focused on effective crime reduction than on expanding citizens' arrest powers.

Its broader business programme includes support for innovation, small businesses, fairer retail payment systems and business investment.

What this could mean for your café: Potentially greater attention to prevention and long-term reductions in offending, although its specific retail crime commitments are less detailed.

Retail CrimeElection 2026: What’s on Offer for Small Business?

2. Side-by-side comparison

Here is how the parties compare on the issues most likely to affect a small café.

Party Stronger enforcement Prevention and rehabilitation Direct retail crime proposals
National Strong Some Extensive
Labour Moderate Some Limited 2026 detail
Greens Opposes expanded enforcement powers Strong Clear position
ACT Very strong Some rehabilitation incentives Extensive
NZ First Strong against organised crime Less emphasis in retail policy Focused on criminal networks
Te Pāti Māori Opposes expanded powers Strong Clear position
Opportunity Evidence-based approach Strong emphasis Less specific

This is a qualitative comparison of published positions, not an assessment of proven effectiveness.

3. What about the financial pressures on your café?

Crime is only one part of the problem. Your food costs, electricity bills, labour costs and reduced customer spending can be just as important to whether the business survives.

Some of the wider 2026 policies are worth considering alongside crime policy.

Party Relevant small-business proposals
National 47-point small-business plan, reducing compliance and regulatory costs, reviewing the GST threshold and simplifying government processes
Labour $10,000 instant asset write-off, faster invoice payments, proposed $80,000 GST threshold
ACT Employment flexibility, regulatory reform and reducing the cost and risk of employing staff
NZ First 20% company tax rate for qualifying SMEs with turnover below $30 million
Greens Support for local business districts, commercial rent initiatives and competition reforms
Opportunity Innovation and small-business support, fairer retail payment systems
Te Pāti Māori Māori enterprise development and economic self-determination

Sources: Business Central's 2026 small-business policy comparison and the parties' published election programmes. Election 2026: What’s on Offer for Small Business?October AMM Comms: Election 2026 – What the Parties Are Proposing for Employers and Small BusinessesLabour's 2026 Election Policies

One important distinction: a lower company tax rate does not necessarily mean lower tax for every café. Your business structure matters. Similarly, GST threshold changes affect registration and administration, not simply your overall tax bill.

4. What I would pay particular attention to as a café owner

I would use five practical tests when evaluating the parties.

  1. Burglary and repeat offending: Does the party have specific proposals to reduce burglaries and stop repeat offenders returning to businesses?
  2. Police response: Does it commit to enough frontline officers, effective investigations and timely responses to business crime?
  3. Staff safety: Will its policies protect your employees from having to confront potentially dangerous offenders?
  4. Prevention: Does it support practical security measures and address the causes of offending?
  5. Business viability: Does it have credible policies to reduce food, electricity, employment and compliance costs, while helping customers retain spending power?

I would also ask candidates a question that often gets overlooked:

If my café is burgled tonight, what specifically will your government do to improve the likelihood that the offender is identified, apprehended and prevented from doing it again?

That is a more useful test than simply asking whether a party is tough on crime.

5. Where to check the original policies

These are particularly useful resources before voting on 7 November 2026:

My overall assessment

There are three broad approaches emerging:

  • National and ACT: Prioritise enforcement, deterrence and stronger powers to protect businesses.
  • Labour and NZ First: Offer different combinations of policing, enforcement and practical business support, with NZ First particularly focused on organised crime.
  • Greens, Te Pāti Māori and Opportunity: Place greater emphasis on prevention, rehabilitation or evidence-based alternatives to punitive enforcement, although Opportunity's approach is less explicitly defined.

None of these approaches automatically guarantees fewer break-ins or better business margins.

For your decision, I would give considerable weight to whether a party has a credible plan for both sides of the problem: protecting the business you have built and making it financially sustainable to keep employing your team.

One final point: I would not assume that retail crime policies automatically translate into better protection for cafés. Ask candidates specifically about hospitality premises, after-hours burglaries, security investment and the practical support available to small businesses after a break-in.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retail and small-business crime, prevention and policing?

Running a hospitality business under the dual weight of escalating operating costs (power and food) and the profound stress of security incidents like a break-in is a difficult challenge.

In the lead-up to the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have put forward distinct policy packages addressing retail crime, policing, prevention, and broader small-business pressures. Below is an overview of what the major parties are proposing to tackle these issues.


1. Crime, Policing, and Prevention

Parties have taken differing approaches to retail safety, spanning tougher sentencing, frontline support, and expanded powers for non-police personnel.

  • National Party: Focuses heavily on law and order and "fixing the basics". Their approach targets repeat offenders and improving community/public safety infrastructure, aiming to back police resources and ensure stronger legal consequences for property and violent crimes.
  • ACT Party: Has heavily targeted retail and small-business crime with specific proposals. Notably, ACT has proposed creating a formal licensing scheme for Accredited Security Operators. This would give trained private security guards expanded, legally-backed authority to manage threats, handle consent-based safety checks, and remove individuals threatening safety in shared spaces or retail environments before police arrive. ACT also pushes for strict mandatory minimum sentences for repeat property offenders (such as serial burglars).
  • Labour Party: Emphasizes a mix of prevention, intervention, and community-led security initiatives. Their framework generally focuses on addressing the root causes of youth and retail crime, providing structured support for at-risk young people, and ensuring police maintain a visible, responsive presence in commercial hubs.
  • New Zealand First: Concentrates on restoring strict law and order, advocating for heightened police visibility, tougher penalties for ram-raids and commercial burglaries, and ensuring that the justice system places a high priority on protecting business owners and victims.

2. Small Business Support, Costs, and Margins

Beyond direct crime prevention, parties have addressed the broader economic squeeze (power, food costs, and declining consumer spending power) impacting hospitality and retail margins:

  • Tax Relief and Compliance:
    • NZ First has proposed lowering the company tax rate for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with turnovers below a certain threshold down to 20%.
    • National emphasizes broad economic management aimed at keeping inflation down, controlling government spending, and cutting red tape (such as streamlining commercial building and compliance consents) to lower overheads.
    • Labour has proposed lifting the GST-registration threshold to give smaller operators more breathing room with compliance, alongside small-business-first frameworks for government procurement.
  • Energy and Operating Costs:
    • Industry bodies like Retail NZ have actively lobbied the 2026 contenders regarding the crippling impact of skyrocketing energy/power prices on bricks-and-mortar stores, calling for structural measures to ease fixed operational overheads. While parties vary on market interventions (such as electricity market reviews or competition settings), cost-of-living and input-cost pressures remain a focal point of debate.

Summary for Your Decision

  • If you lean toward tighter law enforcement, harsher penalties for repeat offenders, and structured security frameworks, the policies from National and ACT (such as ACT's security guard proposals and National's law-and-order focus) will likely align with your priorities.
  • If you are looking primarily for direct tax relief on business revenue (like company tax cuts) or measures targeting input costs and regulatory compliance, parties like NZ First, National, and Labour offer distinct structural adjustments for SMEs.

Would you like to explore how specific party tax policies or compliance changes might directly affect your café's bottom line?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retail and small-business crime, prevention and policing?

Running a hospitality business under the current economic squeeze—balancing food, power, margin pressures, and the stress of a break-in—is a challenging reality.

As you consider your vote at the New Zealand country level for the upcoming general election, the major political parties offer distinct approaches to policing, retail crime prevention, and small-business support.


National (and Government / Coalition Actions)

National’s approach is anchored through its implementation of the Ministerial Advisory Group (MAG) for Victims of Retail Crime and legislative overhauls via the Justice portfolio.

  • Citizen’s Arrest & Restraints: Backed the Crimes Act Amendment Bill , which broadens citizen’s arrest powers (allowing daytime interventions for theft and property offences) and clarifies that reasonable force and mechanical restraints can be used to defend property.

  • Penalties & Infringements: Introduces a formal shoplifting infringement (on-the-spot fine) regime and increases maximum trespass notice durations from two years to three years.

  • Frontline Policing: Pledged and rolled out significant funding for frontline policing, aiming to increase overall police numbers and operational capacity.

  • Technology & Tools: Supports exploring the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) to identify repeat offenders and strengthening powers for private security.

Labour Party

Labour focuses heavily on structural economic relief for small businesses alongside a critical view of shifting physical security burdens onto retail staff.

  • Skepticism on Citizen’s Arrest: Opposes policies that encourage or expand citizen’s arrest and physical intervention powers for shop staff. Labour argues that asking untrained workers to detain shoplifters escalates safety risks and physical danger on the shop floor.

  • Frontline Capacity: Emphasises boosting absolute frontline police numbers and resourcing rather than expanding retail-worker enforcement duties. (During previous terms in government, they also co-funded security infrastructure like fog cannons for vulnerable stores).

  • Broader Small Business & Cost Pressures: Promotes small business policy support, alongside anti-price gouging measures and grocery market reforms aimed at easing supply chain and wholesale food costs for independent operators.

Green Party

The Green Party takes a prevention-first stance that heavily opposes punitive or enforcement-heavy expansions on the shop floor.

  • Opposition to Extra Enforcement Powers: Strongly opposes expanding citizen’s arrest powers, move-on orders, or extended trespass powers, arguing they increase the likelihood of physical conflict and vigilantism.

  • Social and Community Intervention: Argues that retail crime and community offending are symptoms of economic inequality and poverty. They advocate for shifting justice funding into community-led social prevention, mental health, and early intervention programs rather than harsher policing metrics.

ACT and NZ First

  • ACT strongly aligns with law-and-order tightening, championing stiffer penalties for property crime, backing tools that empower business owners and private security to protect their livelihoods, and emphasizing reduced regulatory friction and compliance costs for small enterprises.

  • New Zealand First emphasizes restoring strict public order, backing frontline police capabilities, and increasing consequences for repeat offenders and burglaries impacting commercial storefronts.


Summary to Help Weigh Your Vote

  • If you believe business owners and staff should be legally empowered with expanded arrest, restraint, and trespass tools to directly deter offenders while police response catches up, you will find alignment with National, ACT, and NZ First.

  • If you believe that putting the onus on retail/café workers to detain people creates unacceptable safety risks and that the focus should strictly be on funding more professional police and addressing the wider cost-of-living/grocery squeeze, you will find closer alignment with Labour or the Greens.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retail and small-business crime, prevention and policing?

AI Overview

Running a café under compounding overheads, suppressed customer spending, and the violation of a break-in is an incredibly stressful position to navigate. In the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties have drawn distinct battle lines over how to handle law and order, specifically regarding retail and small-business crime.

The major parties approach the issue through two main philosophies: expanding immediate deterrents and intervention powers on the shop floor, or focusing on systemic, community-led prevention to stop the cycle of reoffending.


🔵 The National Party

National focuses on tougher sentencing and increasing the operational tools available to business owners.

  • Enhanced Interventions: National passed the Crimes Act Amendment Bill, which significantly expanded citizens' arrest powers , enabling retail workers and security guards to physically intervene and use mechanical restraints (such as zip-ties). They have also backed "move-on" laws to give police more leverage to clear disruptive or intimidating behaviour directly outside storefronts.

  • Deterrents & Sentencing: National has restored the "Three Strikes" regime, introduced a specific shoplifting infringement system, capped sentencing discounts at 40%, and increased maximum trespass notice durations from two to three years.

  • Policing: They have committed funding toward frontline policing targets, boosting foot patrols, and utilising the National Retail Investigation Support Unit to target prolific, high-harm repeat offenders.

🔴 The Labour Party

Labour strongly opposes shifting security burdens onto business owners, arguing that pushing untrained staff to perform citizens' arrests introduces extreme safety risks.

  • Evidence-Based Prevention: Labour’s platform relies on evidence-based crime prevention and early intervention programmes designed to address the root socioeconomic causes of theft and break-ins.

  • Physical Infrastructure: Their focus for retail security centres on funding defensive infrastructure (such as subsidising fog cannons and security fit-outs) rather than rewriting laws to encourage physical intervention.

  • Sentencing & Accountability: While keeping National's public ban on gang patches in place, Labour rejects punitive strategies like military-style boot camps for youth offenders and aims to reduce crime volumes by investing heavily in youth rehabilitation.

🟡 ACT

ACT focuses heavily on empowering private security forces to protect commercial precincts.

  • Private Security Expansion: ACT has proposed significantly increasing the powers of private security guards , effectively elevating them to a tier between average citizens and police. Under their plan, guards with specialized training could stop, search, and legally detain offenders for up to 30 minutes while waiting for police.

  • Punitive Measures: They support a complete freeze on the minimum wage to assist small businesses with costs, while advocating for stricter sentencing, including expanding "Three Strikes" to cover burglary offences.

🟢 The Green Party

The Greens focus entirely on systemic reform and social safety nets.

  • Social Prevention: The party strongly opposes the expansion of citizens' arrests, move-on orders, and expanded trespass powers, arguing they elevate shop-floor violence and lead to racial profiling.

  • Community Resources: They propose that commercial justice is achieved by fully funding community-led prevention and wrap-around social services to eliminate the poverty driving retail theft.

⚫ NZ First

NZ First prioritises maximum deterrence and strict post-offence consequences.

  • Mandatory Minimums: Their platform introduces tougher sentences for serious commercial crimes , including mandatory minimum sentences, cumulative sentencing for those who offend while on bail, and a minimum three-year sentence for anyone convicted of burglary three times.

  • Business Relief: To offset systemic financial pressures, they also advocate for lowering the SME (Small and Medium Enterprise) tax rate to 20%.


If you want to look closely at specific operational details, let me know:

  • If you want to know more about the rules and police advice regarding citizens' arrest legislation.

  • How the different parties propose addressing your power and food supply chain costs (e.g., supermarket duopoly breakups or electricity market reforms).

  • Details on current government-funded security allocation grants for small businesses.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account