Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on minimum wages, employment rules and support for hiring and training staff?

2026 New Zealand election: what the parties mean for café employers

For a small café, employment policy affects more than the hourly wage. It influences your ability to roster flexibly, cover busy periods, train inexperienced staff, manage sick leave and other employment costs, and take on new employees.

There are five areas worth comparing:

  1. Minimum wage: how quickly wages rise and whether increases are predictable.
  2. Employment rules: flexibility around hours, casual work, trial periods and dismissals.
  3. Hiring support: wage subsidies, tax incentives and help employing young or inexperienced workers.
  4. Training: apprenticeships, workplace training and government-funded qualifications.
  5. Business operating environment: how employment policy interacts with the wider cost pressures facing hospitality businesses.

The comparison below focuses on the major parties and distinguishes announced policy from existing law. An important qualification: the 2026 election is still a moving target, so not every party has necessarily published a complete employment policy.

1. Minimum wage: where the parties differ

The current adult minimum wage is $23.95 an hour, effective 1 April 2026. The starting-out and training rates are $19.16. The current Government's approach has been moderate annual increases, with the 2026 increase set at 2%. Minimum wage rates and typesMinimum wage is increasing on 1 April 2026Minimum wage increase balances business and worker needs

Party 2026 position or proposal
National Has continued the moderate-increase approach in government. I have not found a specific new minimum-wage formula in its 2026 small-business plan.
Labour Supports annual minimum-wage increases. Its wider employment programme also emphasises better pay and employment protections.
ACT Proposes freezing the adult minimum wage for three years.
Green Party Proposes increasing the minimum wage in line with inflation and abolishing the training wage.
NZ First Proposes annual increases of at least inflation, alongside increased in-work tax credits.
The Opportunity Party Its wider employment and economic programme includes changes to income support and workers' conditions; I have not verified a specific minimum-wage rate proposal.
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises improving incomes and economic opportunities; I have not verified a specific 2026 minimum-wage formula.

Sources: party announcements and the 2026 policy tracker. ACT New ZealandGood Jobs For All of UsElection policy tracker: what the parties are promisingPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026October AMM Comms: Election 2026 – What the Parties Are Proposing for Employers and Small Businesses

What this could mean for your café:

  • A wage freeze could give you more certainty over your minimum hourly wage costs.
  • Inflation-linked increases would mean wages continue rising as prices rise, potentially increasing your payroll.
  • Higher minimum wages may also help employees with their own cost-of-living pressures, which can matter for recruitment and retention.

One important distinction: freezing the minimum wage does not freeze your other employment costs, such as KiwiSaver contributions, leave entitlements or insurance.

2. Employment rules: flexibility versus worker protections

This is one of the clearest differences between the parties.

National

National's existing employment changes include:

  • Restoring 90-day trials for employers of all sizes.
  • Changes to contractor classification.
  • Changes to dismissal and personal grievance rules for certain highly paid employees.
  • Replacing the Holidays Act with a new employment leave framework.

Its 2026 small-business package proposes:

Labour

Labour places greater emphasis on:

  • Restoring Fair Pay Agreements, allowing industry-wide negotiations over minimum employment conditions.
  • Restoring pay equity legislation.
  • Improving worker protections and employment standards.
  • Supporting apprenticeships and vocational training.

For a café, Fair Pay Agreements could be particularly relevant because hospitality employers could face industry-wide employment standards rather than negotiating all conditions individually. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

ACT

ACT proposes:

  • Freeing employers and employees to negotiate employment exits without automatically triggering personal grievance claims.
  • Shortening the time available to commence personal grievance proceedings.
  • Reducing compulsory employer administration of union fees.
  • Simplifying employment rules and reducing compliance costs.

These proposals build on ACT's support for the existing 90-day trial system and changes to employment law. ACT New ZealandReform brings more flexibility for workers and confidence for employers

Green Party

The Greens emphasise:

  • Stronger employment protections.
  • Restoring Fair Pay Agreements.
  • Improved minimum employment conditions.
  • Higher wages and greater workplace security.

This approach would put more emphasis on industry standards and employee bargaining power. Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingGood Jobs For All of Us

NZ First and smaller parties

NZ First's employment approach includes higher minimum wages and stronger in-work family support. Its broader economic programme also includes reducing costs for small businesses.

The Opportunity Party and Te Pāti Māori have wider employment, income and economic-development policies, but I would distinguish those from specific café-employer proposals rather than assume they have detailed hospitality employment plans. October AMM Comms: Election 2026 – What the Parties Are Proposing for Employers and Small BusinessesElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

3. Support for hiring and training staff

This is especially important if you rely on students, young workers or people without much hospitality experience.

Party Relevant hiring and training proposals
National First Employee Support Package, simpler seasonal hiring and reduced apprenticeship paperwork.
Labour Apprenticeship Boost funding and additional support for Māori trades training.
ACT A training wage of 60% of the adult minimum wage for under-20s during their first 12 months with an employer.
Greens Abolish the training wage, provide $2,000 apprentice equipment grants and $2,000 employer completion bonuses.
NZ First Focus on increasing take-home income through minimum-wage and Working for Families changes.
Opportunity Party Emphasis on high-skill employment, innovation and economic development.
Te Pāti Māori Emphasis on Māori-led employment and vocational development.

National’s plan to support Small BusinessesACT New ZealandGood Jobs For All of UsElection policy tracker: what the parties are promisingOctober AMM Comms: Election 2026 – What the Parties Are Proposing for Employers and Small Businesses

A particularly important difference: training wages

ACT's proposal would allow a substantially lower wage for eligible young employees during their first year with an employer.

The Greens propose abolishing the training wage instead.

For a café that spends considerable time training new kitchen hands, dishwashers and front-of-house staff, this is a significant policy difference.

Under current law, the training wage is not simply available to anyone who is learning on the job. For an employee aged 20 or over, it generally requires an approved industry training programme involving at least 60 credits annually. ACT New ZealandGood Jobs For All of UsMinimum wage rates and types

4. What is most relevant to a small café?

Here is how the proposals translate into practical business considerations.

Your concern Policies worth examining
Rising wage bill ACT's proposed wage freeze versus Labour, Greens and NZ First's wage-increase approaches
Training inexperienced staff ACT's proposed training wage versus the Greens' proposal to abolish it
Hiring your first additional employee National's First Employee Support Package
Seasonal and casual staffing National's simplified recurring seasonal agreements
Employment disputes ACT's proposed shorter grievance proceedings and National's faster dispute process
Industry-wide wage conditions Labour and Greens' support for Fair Pay Agreements
Developing skilled employees Labour's Apprenticeship Boost and Greens' apprenticeship incentives

One qualification about training: apprenticeship policies are largely aimed at trades rather than ordinary café roles. A kitchen hand or barista would not automatically qualify for apprenticeship funding. You would need to check whether a particular hospitality qualification or programme is eligible.

5. A few other policies worth considering

Although you asked primarily about employment, your concerns about electricity, food costs, customer spending and the break-in also matter.

Some wider policies may affect your operating environment:

On the break-in, I would separately examine each party's policies on retail crime, police resources, victim support and business security. Employment policies alone won't tell you much about how a café's security risks might be addressed.

6. Where to check the original policies

These are useful resources before voting:

The election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026, so check for any final announcements before voting. October AMM Comms: Election 2026 – What the Parties Are Proposing for Employers and Small BusinessesPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

7. Three questions to help assess the policies against your business

Rather than choosing a party based on one policy, I would look at which employment and business conditions matter most to the long-term viability of your café.

For example:

  1. Would you rather have greater flexibility to employ inexperienced staff at lower initial wages, or pay a higher minimum while having more support for training?
  2. Is your biggest employment concern the hourly wage itself, or the additional costs and administrative risks involved in taking someone on?
  3. Would you prioritise lower operating costs for the business, or stronger wages and purchasing power for employees and customers?

One final thought: For a café, the relationship between wages and customer spending is important. Lower wages may reduce your immediate payroll costs, but if customers have less disposable income, they may also spend less at your café. Conversely, higher wages can increase payroll pressure while potentially supporting customer spending.

That trade-off is worth considering alongside the actual employment policies, rather than looking at minimum wages in isolation.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on minimum wages, employment rules and support for hiring and training staff?

Running a hospitality business under current economic conditions—balancing squeezed margins from food and power, a softer consumer spending environment, and the additional stress of a break-in—presents a very challenging set of pressures.

In the political landscape, the major parties offer contrasting philosophies on how to address small business costs, minimum wages, employment regulations, and hiring/training support.


1. Minimum Wages

  • National and Right-Leaning Parties (ACT / NZ First context):
    • National and ACT generally favour wage moderation to protect business viability during tough economic cycles. Proposals from the right often include measures like freezing or tightly controlling minimum wage increases (for instance, National has previously advocated for restraint, while ACT has pushed for a three-year freeze on the adult minimum wage and the introduction of a lower training wage for younger workers to lower entry barriers).
  • Labour, Greens, and Te Pāti Māori:
    • These parties advocate for regular, inflation-adjusted increases, or tying the minimum wage closer to the "living wage" over time. They argue that raising wages helps stimulate consumer spending power locally, though business groups note this directly increases operational overhead for hospitality owners.

2. Employment Rules and Workplace Flexibility

Recent legislative changes—such as the Employment Relations Amendment Act—have shifted the baseline toward greater employer flexibility, but parties remain deeply divided on whether to protect or repeal these rules:

  • National, ACT, and NZ First:
    • Focus heavily on reducing the "risk and cost" of employing staff. Their frameworks include provisions like clearer contractor gateway tests, high-income exemption thresholds for personal grievances, and measures to limit "nuisance-value" personal grievance claims where employee conduct contributed to a dispute. They argue this gives café owners more confidence to take on staff without facing crippling legal overhead if things don't work out.
  • Labour, Greens, and Te Pāti Māori:
    • Strongly oppose these employer-leaning changes, promising to repeal provisions that weaken personal grievance rights or restrict collective bargaining. They favour stronger worker protections, mandatory pay transparency, and default union-enrollment mechanisms, arguing that fair treatment safeguards workforce stability and reduces turnover.

3. Support for Hiring, Training, and Small Business Administration

Given your need for relief from administrative burdens and help with staffing:

  • National & ACT:
    • Offer specific small-business toolkits aimed at reducing red tape. National’s small business policy includes a First Employee Support Package (designed to help owners navigate payroll, tax, ACC, and leave requirements when scaling up), a "Tell Government Once" service to streamline compliance, and faster, simplified pathways for resolving minor employment disputes. ACT focuses on deregulation, making it simpler to hire and contract, and modernising tax rules.
  • NZ First:
    • Has campaigned on targeted tax relief for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), such as lowering the company tax rate to 20% to free up cash flow.
  • Labour & Greens:
    • Focus heavily on structured public pathways into work. The Greens and Labour promote targeted training programmes, support for apprentices, and "Small Business First" procurement strategies (giving smaller local operators better access to government-related contracts), alongside broader systemic programs to lift consumer incomes so local hospitality spending recovers.

Summary for a Café Owner

  • If your priority is immediate relief from compliance costs, reduced legal risk when hiring, and lower administrative overhead, right-leaning policies (National/ACT/NZ First) align more closely with cutting red tape and freezing or slowing mandatory cost increases.
  • If your priority is boosting local customer spending power through higher wages and securing government-backed training pipelines, left-leaning policies (Labour/Greens) focus on lifting household incomes, though they come with stricter employment regulations and higher wage floors.

Are you looking for specific details on how recent employment law changes affect your current staff contracts, or would you like to explore tax and compliance policies further?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on minimum wages, employment rules and support for hiring and training staff?

Running a small hospitality business under current economic pressures means every dollar and compliance hour counts. Across the political spectrum, parties offer distinct philosophies on how to balance worker support with business viability.


1. Minimum Wage Policies

  • National & NZ First: Focus on modest, inflation-linked adjustments. The National-led coalition adjusted the minimum wage to $23.95 per hour (a 2% increase) and generally supports future increases matching inflation "more or less" to avoid compounding business cost pressures.

  • ACT: Takes a pro-business, cost-mitigation stance for employers, proposing to freeze the adult minimum wage for three years and introduce a 12-month training wage for workers under 20 to ease entry-level labor costs.

  • Labour, Green Party, & Te Pāti Māori: Focus heavily on lifting baseline incomes to match the rising cost of living. Labour criticizes small incremental wage increases as insufficient against food and energy inflation, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori support aligning the legal minimum wage closer to or directly at the calculated Living Wage ($29.90 per hour), with the Greens explicitly seeking to remove the sub-minimum training wage.


2. Employment Rules & Compliance (Holidays, Trials, and Grievances)

  • National & ACT: Center their platform on reducing red tape, compliance costs, and administrative burdens for small business owners. Key changes backed or implemented include extending 90-day trial periods to all employers, repealing Fair Pay Agreements, tightening personal grievance frameworks (such as limiting certain claims or shortening ERA timeframes), and replacing the complex Holidays Act with a simpler, hours-based accrual system.

  • Labour & Green Party: Prioritize worker protections and collective bargaining power. Labour strongly opposes the hours-based Holidays Act replacement proposals and changes to personal grievance/dismissal thresholds, framing them as a erosion of worker security. They favor strengthening sector standards and restoring specific pay equity frameworks.


3. Support for Hiring, Workforce Development, and Training

  • National: Focuses on streamlining administrative hurdles for repeat seasonal hiring (introducing standard recurring seasonal agreements) and smoothing immigration pathways for partners of New Zealand citizens to help tap into available labor pools.

  • Labour: Emphasizes state-backed workforce support, proposing an expanded Apprenticeship Boost scheme and targeted funding through regional and industry frameworks to assist businesses with workforce skills and domestic training development.

  • Te Pāti Māori & Greens: Advocate for publicly funded, community- and iwi-led job training initiatives and specialized employment pathways aimed at targeted demographics, shifting the structure of vocational training toward localized grants.


You can review detailed, industry-specific breakdowns via the Retail NZ Election Hub or cross-reference broader social and labour perspectives on platforms like CCS Disability Action Policy Analysis.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. How do parties differ on minimum wages, employment rules and support for hiring and training staff?

AI Overview

Running a hospitality business under current economic conditions is incredibly tough. Balancing soaring food and utility costs alongside a drop in consumer spending—all while managing the stress of a recent break-in—puts intense pressure on your margins and peace of mind.

As you weigh your options for the 2026 New Zealand general election , the main political parties offer drastically different philosophies regarding how they will handle small business expenses, employment rules, and staff development.

A direct comparison of their platforms outlines how these policies will affect a small team setup like yours:

⚖️ Comparison of Key Employment Policies

Political Party Minimum Wage Approach 90-Day Trial Periods & Workplace Rules Hiring & Training Support
ACT Freeze the adult minimum wage for three years to give businesses cost certainty. Advocates for maximum employer flexibility. Championed the Employment Leave Act to reform/repeal strict holiday rules. Introduces a Training Wage for under-20s set at 60% of the minimum wage for their first year.
National Focuses on stabilizing inflation to naturally manage cost-of-living rather than rapid legislated wage hikes. Aligns with reducing prescriptive red tape and keeping 90-day trials to boost hiring confidence. Offers the "Investment Boost" , a 20% upfront tax deduction on new equipment/machinery to offset business costs.
NZ First Supports annual increases but proposes a long-term pathway to a $25 minimum wage. Seeks to balance worker outcomes with business viability , leaning toward market flexibility. Reinstates the Targeted Trade & Apprenticeship Fund and promises free vocational training fees.
Labour Guarantees the minimum wage increases at least with inflation every year. Plans to restore Fair Pay Agreements (FPAs) , roll back trial extensions, and default to worker-centered frameworks. Promises an "Apprenticeship Boost" and a dedicated small business action plan to get people into work.
Green Party Seeks to progressively lift the minimum wage to match the Living Wage. Proposes a 5th week of annual leave , mandatory overtime pay, automatic union opt-ins, and removing trial periods. Offers a "youth jobs guarantee" funding pathways for 16-to-24-year-olds out of work for 6 months.

🔍 Deep Dive by Party Platform

The Right-of-Center Approach (National & ACT)

If your primary concern is immediate relief from operational costs and the flexibility to manage your small team without dense regulation, the right-of-center parties focus heavily on deregulation:

  • Wages & Staffing: ACT’s proposed three-year freeze on the adult minimum wage ($23.95/hr) explicitly targets labor-intensive industries like hospitality to provide cost relief. Their under-20 Training Wage aims to make taking on inexperienced youth more affordable.

  • Operational Environment: National focuses on addressing your top line by stabilizing inflation to lower power bills and using tax structures like the Investment Boost to help you write off equipment upgrades. Both support keeping 90-day trial periods to reduce the financial risk of a bad hire.

The Left-of-Center Approach (Labour & Greens)

If you believe that the best way to stimulate consumer spending in your café is by putting more money back into workers' pockets, the left-of-center parties favor a worker-centric framework:

  • Wages & Regulations: Labour ensures your wage bills will rise predictably by indexing the minimum wage to inflation, while the Greens push faster toward the Living Wage. They want to bring back Fair Pay Agreements (FPAs) , which set sector-wide minimum standards for hospitality.

  • Hiring Support: Instead of wage discounts, Labour plans to heavily subsidize the training side via an Apprenticeship Boost and regional trade funds, making it cheaper to upskill staff on the job.

The Coalition Wildcard (NZ First)

New Zealand First occupies a middle ground, prioritizing local employment outcomes. They want to push minimum wages up but recognize the strain it puts on small medium enterprises (SMEs). To balance this, they propose tax concessions for businesses that raise wages, alongside cutting the lowest income tax bracket to make take-home pay higher without relying entirely on your payroll.


If you want to look closer at a specific area, let me know:

  • Would you like details on what the parties are proposing regarding retail crime, security funding, or policing to address your break-in?

  • Do you want to see the specific tax relief packages or energy sector changes aimed at reducing small business utility bills?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account