Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about mental health and practical support for family carers?

2026 New Zealand election: mental health and support for family carers

For someone balancing part-time employment with daily unpaid care for an older relative, I would look beyond general promises about improving healthcare.

There are two important questions:

  1. Will you be able to access mental health support yourself, before exhaustion, anxiety or burnout becomes a crisis?
  2. Will you receive practical help with caring, such as reliable respite, replacement care, home support, financial assistance and flexibility at work?

These are related, but not the same. A party can promise better mental health services without doing much to reduce the actual workload on family carers.

The following comparison draws on party policies and election material available as at 1 November 2026. Some commitments are more specific than others, and not every party has published a dedicated family-carer policy.

1. Comparison of the parties

The main distinction is between parties promising better mental health services, parties addressing the wider care system, and parties offering more direct practical or financial assistance.

Party Mental health direction Relevance to family carers
Labour Better access to mental health and addiction services, properly funded teams and culturally appropriate care. Restoring pay equity for care and support workers, with an announced $4-an-hour pay increase for eligible workers. Also proposes a rights-based disability support framework developed with disabled people and carers.
Greens Expand free, accessible community mental health services, prevention and early intervention. Explicitly recognises unpaid care as essential infrastructure. Proposes a long-term ageing strategy and stronger support for disabled people and whānau.
National Its published commitments are less explicit about direct mental health support for family carers. Proposes an 0800 Seniors helpline to help older people navigate government services and access support. Also proposes stronger protections against elder abuse.
NZ First Mental Health Response Units, community-based services, suicide prevention and more school counselling. Some potential benefit through community services, but I found fewer specific commitments to respite or financial support for unpaid carers.
ACT Emphasises changes to health and welfare systems. Its proposed reassessment of health and disability benefits is relevant to people with mental health conditions. I found limited specific commitments to unpaid family carers, respite or carer wellbeing.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Prevention, early intervention, community-based support, a larger mental health workforce and free digital mental health tools for mild-to-moderate needs. Proposes a ten-year health plan and higher investment in community care. Its policy direction could help families, although a guaranteed respite entitlement is not established.
Te Pāti Māori Free community-based mental health services and investment in kaupapa Māori mental health services. Proposes Māori-led disability support, better integration of disability and mental health services, and stronger income support.

Sources: The Conversation's 2026 policy tracker, National Council of Women election survey, CCS Disability Action's election analysis.

2. The parties worth examining more closely

Greens: recognition of unpaid care

Explicit recognition of unpaid care

The Green Party has one of the clearest statements about the value of unpaid care.

Its proposals include:

  • Treating paid and unpaid care as essential economic and social infrastructure.
  • A long-term strategy for an ageing population.
  • Better support for disabled people and their whānau.
  • Expanded free mental health services and community-based early intervention.
  • Restoring pay equity for care and support workers.

This is important because family carers often provide services that would otherwise need to be delivered by the formal health and social care system.

However, recognition of unpaid care does not automatically mean a payment to family carers or guaranteed respite hours. Those details need to be established. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisManifesto 2026

Labour: care workforce and disability support

Labour's proposals include:

  • Restoring pay equity legislation for care and support workers.
  • An immediate pay increase for eligible care workers.
  • A new disability support framework developed with disabled people, carers and disability organisations.
  • Better access to mental health and addiction services.

The pay equity proposal could improve the availability and retention of paid support workers, potentially helping families who struggle to obtain reliable assistance.

But an increase in workers' wages is not the same as a guarantee that an unpaid carer will receive replacement care when needed. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisElection Survey 2026 - National Council of Women of New Zealand

National: practical navigation for older people

National's particularly relevant proposal is an 0800 Seniors helpline.

It is intended to help older people navigate government services and access the assistance they are entitled to.

National also proposes strengthening protections against elder abuse and financial exploitation.

These measures could make it easier for an older relative and their family to find existing assistance. However, a helpline does not itself provide additional home-care hours, emergency cover or respite. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis2026 Election Policy

The other parties

3. What is missing from the election promises?

For someone providing care every day while maintaining part-time employment, I think the most important issue is whether parties will commit to specific, measurable support.

I would look for answers to these six questions:

What you need What a meaningful commitment would look like
Regular respite Guaranteed, funded respite hours or days each year.
Emergency cover Replacement care if you become sick or cannot provide care.
Mental health Free counselling and psychological support specifically accessible to family carers.
Financial security A carer allowance or payment that recognises lost earnings and unpaid work.
Employment flexibility Flexible working arrangements and protection against employment disadvantage due to caring.
Reliable home support More funded home-care workers, continuity of care and shorter waiting times.

One particularly important distinction is that improving support for older people is not necessarily the same as improving support for their family carers.

A policy might help your relative remain at home, but if you are still expected to provide all the daily care, your own circumstances might not improve.

The Carers and Whānau Disability Issues NZ election analysis raises many of these accountability questions, including respite, financial security, carer health and emergency replacement care.

4. Mental health deserves particular attention

Unpaid caring can involve:

  • Constant responsibility and very little time off.
  • Anxiety about what happens if you cannot provide care.
  • Isolation from friends and social activities.
  • Financial stress from reduced working hours.
  • Exhaustion from being unable to switch off.

Mental health policies should therefore include prevention and early intervention, rather than simply providing crisis services.

The Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand has published a 2026 mental health election policy toolkit outlining evidence-based approaches parties could adopt.

I would particularly look for accessible community counselling, peer support groups, affordable psychological services and support that doesn't require a carer to wait until they reach crisis point.

5. My assessment: what should influence your vote?

Based on the published proposals, I would put the following parties on your reading list:

  1. Greens: Particularly interesting for explicit recognition of unpaid care and its broader approach to ageing, community support and mental health.
  2. Labour: Particularly interesting for care workforce investment, pay equity and involving carers in disability support reform.
  3. Te Pāti Māori: Particularly interesting for whānau-centred services, Māori-led support and income security.
  4. TOP: Particularly interesting for preventive healthcare and long-term community-based mental health investment.
  5. National: Particularly interesting for its proposed practical navigation service for older people.

This is an assessment of policy relevance, not an endorsement or a prediction of which party would deliver the best outcomes.

The biggest gap I see across the published commitments is the absence of a clear, universal guarantee of adequate respite and emergency replacement care for unpaid family carers. That is something I would want every party to answer before deciding how to vote.

6. Questions I would put to candidates before the election

You could ask candidates:

  1. Will your party guarantee a minimum amount of respite care for someone providing daily unpaid care to an older relative?
  2. Will you fund counselling or mental health support specifically for unpaid family carers?
  3. What happens if a family carer becomes sick and cannot provide care?
  4. Will you introduce financial assistance that recognises the income and retirement savings carers sacrifice?
  5. How will you ensure home-care services are reliable, rather than leaving families to fill staffing gaps?

I would particularly want written answers identifying funding, eligibility and implementation dates, rather than general promises to support carers.

A useful final resource: The Conversation's interactive 2026 party policy tracker lets you compare the parties' wider election commitments.

One further thing that could make this comparison much more useful is understanding the type of care you provide.

Is your older family member receiving government-funded home support or a needs assessment through Health New Zealand, or are you providing most of the care yourself without regular formal assistance?

That distinction matters because it helps identify which party proposals could actually change your everyday circumstances, particularly around respite, eligibility and financial support.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about mental health and practical support for family carers?

Balancing part-time work with the daily, unpaid care of an older family member is a heavy load, and finding reliable respite and support is a widespread challenge in New Zealand.

Ahead of the 2026 New Zealand general election, political parties have outlined various approaches to health, disability support, mental health, and the recognition of caregivers. How the parties approach these issues generally reflects their broader philosophies on state support, healthcare delivery, and workforce funding.


1. Mental Health Support and Access

Because family carers face high rates of burnout, stress, and secondary mental distress, party policies on primary and community mental health are directly relevant:

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on addressing the root drivers of poor mental health and expanding free, accessible care. Their policy platform includes eliminating therapy waiting lists by training and employing more mental health professionals (such as counselors, psychologists, social workers, and occupational therapists), ensuring mental health services are integrated into publicly owned health systems, and providing mental health support to workers or individuals experiencing distress.
  • Labour Party: Emphasizes strengthening primary care access to reduce overall health strain—such as introducing free GP visits via a "Medicard" system for a set number of visits per year and removing prescription fees. They also focus on expanding mental health and addiction services and phasing out restrictive practices in care settings.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes major investments into Kaupapa Māori mental health and addiction services, shifting the health system away from a crisis-only response toward holistic whānau wellbeing and prevention.
  • National and ACT (Center-Right/Right Parties): Generally focus their mental health strategies on improving front-line clinical workforces, targeting funding toward specific community or primary mental health initiatives, and ensuring accountability and measurable targets within Health NZ, alongside boosting general practice funding to ease pressures on primary care.

2. Practical Support, Disability, and Carer Recognition

Practical help—such as respite care, home-help services, and financial recognition for carers—frequently intersects with disability support and welfare policies:

  • Green Party & Progressive/Left-leaning alignment: The Greens explicitly advocate to recognise unpaid care and whānau support as valuable labour. Their wider policy framework around disability support stresses removing access barriers across assessments and funding, ensuring disability support is not siloed from wider health and mental wellbeing, and lifting main benefit levels so that those caring for family members are not forced into poverty. They also propose long-term strategies for an ageing population that encompass elder wellbeing and support systems.
  • ACT Party: Proposes reforms to welfare and retirement settings, including raising the New Zealand Superannuation age to 67 by 2035 while implementing compassionate early access specifically for individuals who have spent their careers in physically demanding jobs or care roles. Their approach to welfare emphasizes independent medical criteria for benefits and structured re-assessments.
  • Mainstream/Current Government Focus (National-led context): Focuses heavily on the delivery and operational efficiency of Health NZ and Disability Support Services (often addressing the administration, resourcing, and front-line capacity of home and community-based support services).

Finding More Specific Information

Because manifestos contain extensive line items, you can check specific party hubs or independent tools as the campaign progresses:

  • The Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand runs an Election Hub and Election Scorecard tracking how parties respond to specific community and mental health infrastructure questions.
  • Platforms like Policy.nz allow voters to cross-reference specific subtopics (such as disability support, carer recognition, and mental health funding) directly against competing party manifestos.

What specific type of practical support (such as regular respite care, financial assistance, or navigation help) would make the biggest difference for you and your family member right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about mental health and practical support for family carers?

Balancing part-time work with daily, unpaid caregiving is a demanding load, and finding reliable practical support is a widespread challenge in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Ahead of the 2026 general election, New Zealand political parties approach health, mental health support, and community care through varying lenses. You can explore and compare specific party manifestos directly on Policy.nz or review sector-specific positions via the Mental Health Foundation Election Scorecard.

An overview of general approaches and proposals from the main political groupings reveals distinct priorities:

  • National and Governing Parties (ACT, NZ First): Current governing and right-of-centre parties generally focus on maximizing efficiency within the existing health infrastructure, expanding community pharmacy scopes, subsidising more medicines, and streamlining delivery rather than broad new entitlement programs. Their emphasis tends to be on economic management, backing primary care, and supporting clinical workforce expansions (such as physician associates and pharmacists) to ease overall system pressures.

  • Labour and Centre-Left Parties: Centre-left parties place heavy emphasis on strengthening public health services and reducing cost-of-living barriers for families. Their proposals frequently feature initiatives like moving toward free or low-cost GP visits, removing prescription fees, and boosting direct funding to public mental health and disability support infrastructure to alleviate the strain on informal, unpaid family carers.

  • The Green Party: The Greens emphasize expanded, accessible mental health support embedded directly into communities, alongside increased funding for social infrastructure and income support. Their platforms typically advocate for universal access to mental health services (such as free or subsidised counselling) and greater recognition and resource allocation for disability and carer support networks.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Te Pāti Māori approaches health and caregiving through a whānau-centred, kaupapa Māori framework, advocating for localized and culturally safe health delivery, increased autonomy and resourcing for iwi/Māori-led health providers, and targeted financial recognition or support for whānau caregivers.

Where to look next for your decision-making:

  • Read party-by-party breakdowns on Policy.nz to filter specific commitments on health, disabilities, and income support.

  • Check the Mental Health Foundation to see how individual parties responded to targeted questions on mental health action and community wellbeing commitments.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about mental health and practical support for family carers?

AI Overview

Juggling part-time work alongside daily care for an older family member is incredibly demanding. Political representation for unpaid carers has been historically limited, but the upcoming 2026 New Zealand General Election has brought these issues into sharper focus.

Political advocacy groups like Carers NZ have urged all parties to stop cheap campaigning and explicitly state their long-term funding commitments to Mahi Aroha (the Carers’ Strategy Action Plan).

Political proposals vary across the spectrum regarding mental health and practical support for family carers:


🏛️ Practical Support & Relief for Carers

Political Party Primary Proposals for Practical & Disability Support Workforce & Funding Targets
National Maintains current primary care funding pathways. Passed the Disability Support Services Act 2026 to provide "clarity and stability" to the sector. Focused on addressing the structural caregiving shortage; invested $447M into primary care capacity in the prior budget cycle.
Labour Promises to repeal and redraft the Disability Support Services Act with direct input from disabled communities. Proposes an immediate $4/hour pay rise for care and support workers to improve relief staff availability. Intends to end the health-sector hiring freeze and introduce a $6,000 Disability Supplement aimed at supporting family carers.
Green Party Advocates for universal, fully publicly funded aged care and disability sectors. Strongly supports restoring complete funding flexibility for home care. Proposes transitioning privately funded care services to a free public model, funded via a proposed wealth tax.
ACT Favors a "government-as-purchaser" model. Supports individual choice but seeks to reduce direct state provision. Focuses heavily on reducing bureaucratic overhead within health and support departments.
Te Pāti Māori Supports free primary care for lower-income whānau (under $60k) and a specialized Māori Health Card to link funding directly to patients. Prioritizes expanding culturally safe dementia and elder care services.

🧠 Mental Health & Primary Healthcare Accessibility

Managing everyday care significantly impacts the mental health of informal caregivers. The parties offer different frameworks to relieve the financial and emotional burden of seeking medical or mental health care:

  • Labour: Is campaigning on its flagship "Medicard" policy , which guarantees three free GP visits a year and free prescriptions for all New Zealanders. This aims to make everyday healthcare and mental health check-ups affordable without worrying about out-of-pocket costs.

  • Green Party: Proposes eliminating therapy and mental health waiting lists entirely by significantly increasing funding to train and hire psychologists, counselors, and social workers. They also advocate for unlimited free GP visits.

  • National: Focuses on infrastructure and frontline peer support. They previously highlighted a $1.96 billion mental health package and invested $1 million specifically to scale up and train the peer support workforce , prioritizing community-led mental health initiatives.

  • New Zealand First: Focuses on a $925M waitlist reduction fund and reallocating healthcare resources toward preventative medicine and bolstering frontline GPs and nurses to handle patient distress earlier.


🗳️ Next Steps for Enrolling and Voting

If you are looking to make your voice heard as a caregiver, the Elections NZ Access 2026 Action Plan provides specific services for disabled individuals, older voters, and their carers.

The Electoral Commission is hosting online Q&A sessions designed to explain available accessibility supports if getting away from the house to vote is difficult. You can check resources directly on Vote.nz or call 0800 36 76 56 to arrange support.

If you would like to look deeper into a specific area, I can provide more details. Would you like to explore:

  • The exact criteria for how family members can currently get paid for care under Health NZ?

  • A deeper breakdown of the $6,000 Disability Supplement proposal?

  • How to arrange remote or assisted voting options so you don't have to leave your family member alone?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account