Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

2026 New Zealand election: What do the parties want to do about food and bills?

First, it's completely reasonable to find election policies confusing. Political parties often use big words for fairly simple ideas.

Let's make this practical. If you're thinking about how much money you have left after buying groceries, paying for electricity, filling the car and covering everyday expenses, there are some important differences between the parties.

The biggest difference is how they think the problem should be fixed:

  • Some want supermarkets and power companies to face more competition.
  • Some want the Government to step in more strongly and regulate prices.
  • Some want to give households more money directly.
  • Others want to make it easier for businesses to compete, hoping that prices will come down.

I'll explain the main parties' announced 2026 policies without recommending who you should vote for.

1. Food and supermarket prices

What a basket of essential groceries costs around the world today | lovemoney.com

Cost of Living in New Zealand 2026: Groceries, Rent & Food Budgets | NZ Navigator

Rising food prices put squeeze on struggling Northlanders - NZ Herald

8

New Zealand's supermarket market is dominated by two major groups: Woolworths and Foodstuffs (which operates Pak'nSave, New World and Four Square).

The parties disagree about what should be done about this.

What each party proposes

Party What they want to do
National Separate Pak'nSave from New World and Four Square, if the Commerce Commission agrees it would benefit shoppers. The idea is to create stronger competition.
Labour Separate supermarket wholesale operations from retail operations, making it fairer for smaller grocery stores to buy stock. Also make excessive pricing by powerful companies illegal.
Greens Create a publicly owned supermarket chain called KiwiMart by bringing at least 120 existing supermarket stores into public ownership. Also introduce stronger controls on excessive supermarket prices.
ACT Make it quicker and easier for new supermarkets to open, including potential overseas competitors. ACT believes more competition is better than forcing existing businesses to split up.
NZ First Split Foodstuffs into two competing cooperatives, separating Pak'nSave from New World and Four Square. Also break up the supermarket duopoly.
Te Pāti Māori Support Māori-owned supermarkets and food businesses. Offer a food tax credit for people earning up to $60,000, worth up to eight weeks of food each year.
Opportunity Give the Commerce Commission stronger powers to tackle companies that dominate markets and potentially break up monopolies and duopolies.

Sources: Consumer NZ's October 2026 analysis and the 2026 policy tracker. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sectorElection policy tracker: what the parties are promisingGrocery

What does that mean in everyday language?

There are three broad approaches:

  • More competition: National and ACT want supermarkets to compete harder, giving shoppers more choice.
  • Stronger Government intervention: Labour and the Greens want tougher rules on supermarket pricing and how supermarkets operate.
  • More direct alternatives and support: NZ First wants structural changes, while Te Pāti Māori wants Māori-owned alternatives and direct food assistance.

One important thing: splitting up supermarkets doesn't automatically mean groceries will become cheaper. Consumer NZ points out that running separate warehouses, systems and distribution networks could also increase costs. Election 2026: How the main parties plan to improve the grocery sector

2. Electricity, petrol and other household bills

'Administrative error': Electrical work watchdog chair signs disciplinary hearing for own employee | RNZ News

Solar Installation Nelson Tasman | Solar Electric Technology

This is where the parties have quite different ideas.

Party Their general approach
National Build more electricity supply, make it easier to develop renewable energy, improve electricity-market settings and offer low-interest loans through a Home Energy Fund.
Labour Freeze fuel tax for three years, offer solar installations without upfront costs through its SolarSaver scheme, and introduce stronger rules against excessive pricing for essentials including power.
Greens Invest in renewable energy, community-owned power projects and home solar. Offer zero-interest loans for clean energy improvements.
ACT Change electricity-market settings, including how power companies charge for lines and how households are paid for sending solar electricity back to the grid.
NZ First Break up power companies, remove the Emissions Trading Scheme component of petrol and diesel costs, and provide more direct financial support to eligible working families.
Opportunity Increase renewable electricity generation and provide low-interest loans to help households electrify their homes.
Te Pāti Māori Establish a $1 billion Energy Sovereignty Fund to support Māori and community ownership of renewable energy.

Election policy tracker: what the parties are promising2026 Election PolicyLabour's 2026 Election Policies

What about the cost of running a car?

Some notable differences:

  • Labour: Freeze fuel tax for three years. This is intended to stop fuel excise increases during that period.
  • NZ First: Remove the Emissions Trading Scheme component of fuel costs and increase support for eligible working families.
  • Greens: Encourage alternatives to driving, including cheaper public transport.
  • National: Focus on infrastructure, roads and developing more reliable energy supplies.
  • ACT: Generally favours reducing costs through less regulation and more market competition.

What about transport costs?

Labour proposes a weekly public transport fare cap:

  • $20 a week in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.
  • $10 a week elsewhere.

The Greens propose $2 adult fares and free public transport for children, students and Community Services Card holders.

Opportunity proposes free public transport.

These are proposals, not existing entitlements. Labour's 2026 Election PoliciesElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

3. Who wants to put more money directly into household budgets?

This is another important difference, particularly if you're struggling with weekly expenses.

  • NZ First: Wants to make temporary increases to Working for Families payments permanent, adding a proposed $70 a week to the in-work tax credit for eligible families. It also proposes extra support for working families through the fuel relief payment.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Wants to give people earning up to $60,000 a year a food tax credit worth up to eight weeks of food annually.
  • Labour: Wants to increase the minimum wage in line with inflation and restore pay equity for care workers. It also proposes free prescriptions and cheaper public transport.
  • Greens: Want to increase food grants available through Work and Income, support food banks and restore and expand free school lunches.
  • National: Emphasises keeping taxes down, growing the economy and controlling government spending.
  • ACT: Emphasises lower government spending, less regulation and creating conditions for businesses to grow.
  • Opportunity: Proposes a universal income of up to $370 a week for eligible adults, replacing most existing benefits with a different income-support system.

Election policy tracker: what the parties are promisingElection policy tracker: what the parties are promising

4. What are the biggest differences at a glance?

Here's a simplified comparison.

If your priority is... Parties with particularly relevant proposals
More supermarket competition National, ACT, NZ First
Stronger controls on supermarket prices Labour, Greens
More affordable food directly Te Pāti Māori, Greens
More help for working families NZ First
Keeping taxes down National, ACT
Cheaper public transport Labour, Greens, Opportunity
More renewable energy and home solar Greens, Labour, Opportunity
Changing how power companies operate NZ First, Greens
More direct household income support NZ First, Te Pāti Māori, Opportunity

This isn't a ranking of which party is best. It's a guide to where their policies place their emphasis.

5. A few political words explained

You might come across these terms while researching parties.

  • Cost of living: How much it costs to pay for everyday necessities, such as food, rent, power and transport.
  • Duopoly: A market controlled by two major businesses. New Zealand's supermarket industry is a common example.
  • Commerce Commission: An independent organisation that monitors businesses and enforces rules about competition and fair trading.
  • Price gouging: Charging excessively high prices, particularly when customers have few alternatives.
  • Subsidy: Financial help from the Government to reduce the cost of something.
  • Tax credit: A tax-related benefit that can reduce the tax you owe or increase the support you receive, depending on how it's structured.
  • Public ownership: A business or service owned by the Government rather than private investors.

6. What should you consider before deciding?

I'd suggest thinking about these four questions:

  1. Do you want supermarkets and power companies to face tougher Government rules? Or would you rather see the Government encourage more businesses to compete?
  2. Would you prefer direct financial help for households? Or policies designed to reduce prices over time?
  3. Are you more concerned about immediate relief? Or longer-term changes that might eventually make living costs lower?
  4. Which bills affect your household most? Groceries, electricity, petrol, rent, mortgage payments or something else?

One final thing worth understanding: a party can promise to do something, but that doesn't mean it will definitely happen. The party needs enough parliamentary support, the policy needs to be implemented, and the results may take time.

Let's narrow this down to what matters to you

Since you're considering your first vote, I'd be happy to help you compare parties based on your actual priorities, rather than political labels.

Which of these is the biggest concern in your household at the moment?

You don't need to know everything about politics to make an informed vote. Understanding what parties want to do about the things that affect your everyday life is a very good place to start.


Worked for 12s

Searching the web

Searching the web

Searched 7 websites

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

Voting for the first time is a big milestone, and it is completely normal to find political terms confusing. When political parties talk about the "cost of living," they are mostly talking about everyday expenses like food, power, and household bills.

Different parties have very different ideas about how to fix these problems. Here is a simple, jargon-free breakdown of what the major parties want to do.


1. National & ACT (Focus: Lower taxes, spending control, and business growth)

These parties generally believe that the government should step back, keep taxes low, and let private businesses run the economy.

  • The Food & Bills Plan: They argue that high prices are driven by government debt, red tape, and excessive spending. Their solution is to cut government spending, keep taxes down, and make it easier for businesses to operate, which they say will naturally create a stronger economy and more jobs.
  • Supermarkets & Power: They generally oppose government ownership or heavy market intervention, preferring to rely on competition rules rather than breaking up companies by force.

2. Labour (Focus: Expanding public services and targeted cost relief)

Labour focuses on using government services and tax changes to lower what everyday people have to pay out of pocket.

  • The Food & Bills Plan: They propose targeted cost-relief measures and funding public services to reduce household pressure. For the wider budget, they have proposed a tax on profits from selling investment property (excluding the family home) to help fund public health and ease pressure elsewhere.
  • Bills & Transport: They have also emphasized practical relief like public transport fare caps and support for household health and medical costs.

3. Green Party (Focus: Direct intervention and wealth redistribution)

The Greens believe the system needs structural changes so that wealth is shared more evenly and essential items are affordable for everyone.

  • The Food & Bills Plan: They propose major changes to the grocery sector, including breaking up the major supermarket duopoly and creating a state-owned grocery chain (sometimes referred to as "KiwiMart") to mandate lower food prices.
  • Bills & Rent: They strongly support capping annual rent increases and addressing power bills through energy-efficient home upgrades and tackling the electricity market. They fund this by introducing wealth and high-earner taxes.

4. New Zealand First (Focus: Market shake-ups and national economic protection)

NZ First focuses heavily on national sovereignty, pushing back against corporate monopolies, and lowering everyday costs directly.

  • The Food & Bills Plan: They want to heavily crack down on the major supermarket duopoly to force food prices down.
  • Bills & Banking: They propose major structural changes, such as splitting up major power companies and creating a Crown-owned national bank to help stabilize financial pressures for everyday Kiwis.

Summary: What's the core difference?

  • If you believe the best way to help families is to cut government spending and keep taxes low so businesses can grow, you will likely lean toward National or ACT.
  • If you believe the government should fund public services and use targeted support to help with household costs, you will likely lean toward Labour.
  • If you believe the government should actively step in, break up big monopolies (like supermarkets), and tax wealth to fund cheaper living, you will likely lean toward the Greens or New Zealand First.

Is there a particular household bill or cost (like power, rent, or groceries) that worries you the most right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm an eligible voter who finds political jargon difficult and hasn't voted before. I want clear explanations without being talked down to. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties want to do about food and bills? Explain the differences simply.

Navigating your first election and trying to make sense of political talk can feel overwhelming. Cost of living—specifically food and household bills—is a major focus for voters.

To keep things straightforward, the major New Zealand political parties generally fall into different schools of thought on how to lower your grocery and household bills. Here is how they break down simply:

  • National

  • The Core Idea: Fix the wider economy and cut government red tape so businesses can operate cheaper, which they argue will naturally drive down prices over time.

  • On Food & Bills: They focus on "responsible fiscal management"—cutting government spending, reducing business compliance costs, and adjusting income-tax brackets to let you keep more of your pay packet rather than creating new government programs.

  • Labour

  • The Core Idea: Direct financial relief by making everyday essentials free or capped, funded by government investment.

  • On Food & Bills: They have proposed policies like three free GP visits and free prescriptions a year, capping public transport fares (e.g., a maximum of $20 a week in main centres), introducing legislation to crack down on supermarket/fuel price gouging, and looking into splitting up major supermarket operations to increase competition.

  • The Green Party

  • The Core Idea: Systemic changes and targeting wealth inequality, believing that under-investment in public services hurts everyday people.

  • On Food & Bills: They advocate for major structural solutions like wealth taxes on top earners to fund large-scale public services, free public transport, and funding community-led food security initiatives and school lunch programmes.

  • ACT

  • The Core Idea: Shrink the size of government, cut regulations, and rely entirely on the free market.

  • On Food & Bills: ACT argues that bloated government spending causes inflation. Their solution is to radically cut government spending, reduce regulations, and implement a simplified, lower income tax structure to boost overall economic productivity.

  • New Zealand First

  • The Core Idea: Economic nationalism, targeting specific cost pressures, and protecting fixed-income or older New Zealanders.

  • On Food & Bills: They have proposed targeted relief such as removing GST from basic food items, tightening immigration to ease demand on infrastructure and housing, and strongly protecting Superannuation.

  • Te Pāti Māori

  • The Core Idea: Radical wealth redistribution and treating essentials as human rights.

  • On Food & Bills: They propose removing GST from all food, introducing a high tax-free income threshold (e.g., first $30,000 tax-free), and funding it through new wealth and capital gains taxes to lower the financial pressure on low- and middle-income whānau.

Summary of Differences

  • The Market/Tax Cut Approach (ACT, National): Focuses on lowering taxes and reducing government rules so things get cheaper on their own through competition and business growth.

  • The Direct Service Approach (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori): Focuses on the government stepping in directly—making specific services (like transport or doctor visits) free or capped, removing GST off food, or taxing higher-wealth earners to fund cost-of-living support.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account