Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

New Zealand 2026 election: accessible transport and independent living

Your question raises two important but connected issues: being able to get around independently and having the support, housing and services needed to remain independent while renting.

For the 2026 general election, I would compare parties on more than whether they promise accessible buses. The practical questions are:

  • Can you board public transport independently, including if you use a wheelchair, walking frame or mobility aid?
  • Are buses, trains, stations, stops and footpaths accessible?
  • Are wheelchair-accessible taxis and community transport affordable and available?
  • Can you access disability support without excessive waiting, cost or administrative barriers?
  • Can you remain in your rental home, including if it needs accessibility modifications?

It is also important to distinguish between an announced 2026 election policy, an existing government policy and a party's historical position. They are not necessarily the same.

1. Accessible public transport: what the parties would change

This is particularly relevant if you depend on Total Mobility, accessible taxis or public buses to attend appointments, shop, work or participate in your community.

Policies and party positions reported in October 2026.

Green Party

Green Party NZ (@NZGreens) on X

Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand

The Greens have announced several specific transport commitments:

  • Restore the Total Mobility taxi subsidy from 65% to 75%.
  • Increase the number of accessible mobility vehicles to meet demand.
  • Provide free public transport for Total Mobility users.
  • Provide free bus and train travel for children, students, apprentices, Community Services Card holders and people aged 25 and under.
  • Cap other adult bus and train fares at $2 per journey.
  • Introduce enforceable accessibility standards covering transport and public infrastructure.

What this could mean: Lower costs for accessible taxi journeys, better availability of mobility vehicles and stronger legal requirements for accessible transport.

Sources: CCS Disability Action and The D*List. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisParty policies, simplified: TransportParty policies, simplified: Accessibility

National Party

Will National Party Finish 2nd in New Zealand's 2026 Election?

New Zealand National Party

National has proposed:

  • Keeping the Total Mobility subsidy at 65%, rather than restoring it to 75%.
  • Developing a national purpose statement for Total Mobility.
  • Reviewing provider standards and safeguards.
  • Asking officials to develop a national public transport concession for Total Mobility users, potentially including free companion fares.
  • Reinvesting Crown savings to address public transport funding shortfalls.

What this could mean: More consistent Total Mobility arrangements and potentially cheaper travel for someone who needs a support person to accompany them. However, the taxi subsidy itself would remain below its former 75% level.

National has also proposed an Auckland public transport safety initiative, although this is geographically specific rather than a nationwide accessibility commitment.

Sources: The D*List and CCS Disability Action. Party policies, simplified: TransportElection 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

Labour Party

South Island Election Conference 2026

New Zealand Labour Party

Labour's main announced transport commitment is:

  • Cap public transport fares at $20 per week in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch.
  • Cap fares at $10 per week elsewhere in New Zealand.

Labour has not confirmed whether it would restore the Total Mobility subsidy to 75%.

What this could mean: Lower regular public transport expenses, particularly if you use buses or trains frequently. However, the fare cap does not by itself guarantee accessible vehicles, accessible stops or affordable wheelchair taxis.

Source: The D*List's October 2026 party policy comparison. Party policies, simplified: Transport

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori - Party for Party vote - NZ Election 2023 - Policy.nz

Te Pāti Māori

Its transport commitments include:

  • Making public transport free for everyone within five years.
  • Ensuring disabled people are among the first groups to receive free public transport if the policy is introduced in stages.
  • Embedding accessibility in transport, housing and public spaces.

What this could mean: Reduced or eliminated public transport fares, with disabled passengers prioritised in the rollout. The published commitments are less specific about accessible taxi subsidies, vehicle numbers and implementation standards.

Source: The D*List. Party policies, simplified: TransportParty policies, simplified: Accessibility

ACT Party

South Island Election Conference 2026

ACT New Zealand

ACT has defended the reduction of the Total Mobility subsidy to 65%, arguing that it is necessary to keep the scheme financially sustainable.

It has also said it supports:

  • Removing unnecessary barriers to mobility.
  • Effective and accessible services.
  • Practical accessibility improvements and measurable outcomes.

It has not announced a specific commitment to restore the 75% taxi subsidy or a detailed transport accessibility programme.

What this could mean: The existing subsidy arrangement would continue, with an emphasis on financial sustainability and practical improvements rather than a stated increase in transport assistance.

Source: The D*List. Party policies, simplified: TransportParty policies, simplified: Accessibility

New Zealand First

New Zealand legislative election winner? Predictions & Od... 2026 | Polymarket

New Zealand First

Its transport policy focuses on:

  • Maintaining and improving the national rail network.
  • Improving regional rail connections.
  • Removing network bottlenecks.

NZ First has also put forward an Accessibility Standards Bill, intended to incorporate accessibility into new schools, transport hubs and public buildings.

However, it has not provided a clear commitment to increase Total Mobility subsidies or expand accessible taxi availability.

What this could mean: Potential improvements to accessible infrastructure, but less certainty about direct financial help with your everyday transport costs.

Sources: The D*List and The Spinoff. Party policies, simplified: TransportHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Party policies, simplified: Accessibility

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

TOP is campaigning for free public transport for everyone.

It also supports:

  • More accessible information and communication.
  • Services that accommodate different access needs.
  • A proposed citizen's income and additional disability allowance, while retaining specific disability support such as transport funding.

TOP did not provide detailed responses to all the transport questions put to parties by The D*List.

What this could mean: Potentially lower everyday public transport expenses, but you would want clarification on whether free travel would include accessible alternatives such as taxis.

Sources: The D*List and The Spinoff. Party policies, simplified: TransportHow do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

2. At-a-glance transport comparison

Party Total Mobility subsidy Public transport fares
Greens Restore to 75% Free for Total Mobility users; $2 adult cap
National Retain 65% Considering a national concession and companion fare
Labour No confirmed increase $10–$20 weekly cap
Te Pāti Māori No specific increase confirmed Free for everyone within five years
ACT Retain 65% No specific fare concession announced
NZ First No specific increase confirmed Rail network investment
TOP No specific increase confirmed Free public transport for everyone

The Total Mobility subsidy is a government contribution towards eligible taxi journeys, not a guarantee that a wheelchair-accessible vehicle is available. A proposed fare concession is also not necessarily the same as free accessible taxi travel.

Source: The D*List's direct party comparison, October 2026. Party policies, simplified: Transport

3. Housing and renting: can you remain independent?

Transport is only part of independence. If you rent, the availability of accessible housing, permission to make modifications, affordability and security of tenure can be just as important.

Here is what the parties have indicated.

Party Housing commitments relevant to disabled renters
Greens Universal design standards for new housing, more accessible public and community housing, and stronger renter protections.
Labour At least 25% of new Kāinga Ora builds to be accessible.
Te Pāti Māori Accessible government housing designed around the needs of different whānau, alongside investment in Māori housing.
TOP More accessible public housing and Building Code reform to encourage accessible homes.
National Housing supply initiatives, but no specific accessible-housing requirement identified.
ACT Market-led housing supply, without a specific accessible-housing standard identified.
NZ First General housing supply and support for older people remaining at home; no clear disability-specific accessible-housing target identified.

Sources: CCS Disability Action and The D*List's housing comparison. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisHow do parties rate on their disability policies?

Two distinctions matter when you rent:

  • An accessible new-build target does not necessarily help you find an accessible private rental immediately.
  • A general promise to increase housing supply does not guarantee that homes will have accessible bathrooms, step-free entrances, suitable door widths or enough room to manoeuvre mobility equipment.

The Greens have specifically identified universal design in both public and private housing. Labour has a measurable target for accessible Kāinga Ora construction. Te Pāti Māori has also addressed accessibility in government housing.

The D*List's October 30 comparison identifies the Greens and Te Pāti Māori as supporting improvements to renter rights or costs, while National does not. Labour's position was recorded as unclear on that particular question. How do parties rate on their disability policies?Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

4. Disability support and the ability to live independently

This is another important area to investigate before voting.

You may depend on support for everyday activities, personal care, household tasks, equipment, getting to appointments or managing your home.

The parties have different approaches to disability support funding.

Green Party

  • Supports the Enabling Good Lives approach, which emphasises choice and control.
  • Supports more individualised disability funding.
  • Wants to reduce administrative barriers to accessing support.
  • Supports improved income assistance, including reforming partnered means testing.
  • Supports disability rights legislation and enforceable accessibility standards.

The Greens' proposals address both the financial and practical barriers to living independently. Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

Labour

Labour has promised to:

  • Repeal the Disability Support Services Act 2026.
  • Develop replacement legislation in partnership with disabled people, carers and disability organisations.
  • Require government agencies to produce Enabling Good Lives impact assessments and targets.
  • End annual benefit renewals for people with verified permanent disabilities.
  • Amend the Human Rights Act to recognise denial of reasonable accommodation as discrimination.

For someone relying on ongoing support, the benefit-renewal commitment and proposed changes to disability legislation are particularly relevant. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisParty policies, simplified: Disability policy

National

National's approach has focused on:

  • Financial stability of disability support services.
  • More consistent assessment and allocation nationally.
  • Some restoration of flexibility in individualised funding.
  • Continued investment in disability support services.

National has not published a comprehensive standalone disability manifesto for this election.

An important distinction is that National's existing government decisions and funding commitments are not all new election promises. Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

ACT

ACT emphasises:

  • Individual choice and control over funding.
  • Reducing bureaucracy.
  • More direct, individualised funding arrangements.
  • Financial accountability and smaller government.

It has not set out a comprehensive disability rights or accessible-housing programme for 2026. Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026Party policies, simplified: Accessibility

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori places emphasis on:

  • Māori-led disability support services.
  • Self-determination and choice for tāngata whaikaha Māori.
  • Accessible housing and community participation.
  • Disability support that recognises the needs of whānau.

Its approach is based on the principle that disabled people should have control over decisions affecting their lives. Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

New Zealand First

NZ First has not published a comprehensive standalone disability support programme for this election. Its disability-related commitments are less detailed than those of parties with specific disability platforms. Disability Policies of New Zealand’s Political Parties – 2026How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?

TOP

TOP proposes wider income reform through a citizen's income and a separate disability allowance, with additional needs-based assistance.

It has also proposed a 'Tell Us Once' system, so people with ongoing support needs do not have to repeatedly provide the same information or undergo unnecessary assessments.

Its proposals are relevant to financial independence and reducing administrative difficulties, although you should check how existing disability-specific payments and entitlements would transition under its proposed system. How do the different parties fare on disability issues this election?Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis

5. The issues I would check particularly carefully

For your circumstances, these are useful questions to put to every candidate, regardless of party.

Issue What to ask candidates
Accessible taxis Will you restore or increase the Total Mobility subsidy?
Vehicle availability How will you ensure accessible taxis are available when needed, including outside major centres?
Public transport Will buses, stops, stations and travel information have enforceable accessibility requirements?
Companions Will a support person be able to travel free with someone who needs assistance?
Rental housing Will you increase accessible private and public rental housing?
Home modifications Will renters be able to get necessary accessibility modifications without unreasonable delays or costs?
Support services Will you protect individualised funding and continuity of essential support?
Income Will disability-related costs be adequately recognised in benefit and income support arrangements?

One particularly important question is whether a party's transport policy covers people who cannot use an ordinary bus or train at all. A cheap bus fare is not much help if you cannot board the bus.

6. What the differences mean for your circumstances

Here is a neutral way to organise the policies around the things that affect independent living.

Your priority Party commitments to examine
Lower accessible taxi costs Greens' 75% Total Mobility subsidy proposal
More accessible transport options Greens' mobility vehicle expansion and accessibility standards
Lower everyday bus and train costs Greens, Labour, Te Pāti Māori and TOP
Free companion travel National's proposed national concession
Accessible rental housing Greens, Labour, Te Pāti Māori and TOP
Stronger legal accessibility rights Greens, Labour, Te Pāti Māori and TOP
Greater control over disability support Greens, Labour, ACT and Te Pāti Māori
Less repetitive disability assessments TOP and Labour
More adequate disability income Greens and TOP, with different income-reform models

These are areas of policy emphasis, not an overall ranking of parties. Some commitments are more developed than others, and some remain proposals without detailed implementation plans.

7. Where to check the policies before voting

I recommend looking at disability-led organisations' election resources, rather than relying exclusively on party advertising.

The election is scheduled for 7 November 2026, so check for policy updates before casting your vote.

My suggested next step: assess the practical impact

I would encourage you to judge each party against one central question:

Will its policies make it easier for me to afford, access and maintain the support and housing I need to live independently, without having to rely on other people unnecessarily?

Three particularly important things to investigate are:

  1. Whether you could afford to travel to essential appointments and activities.
  2. Whether suitable rental housing would be available if you had to move.
  3. Whether your disability support and funding would remain reliable and flexible.

Those questions go beyond political promises and focus on what changes you might actually experience in everyday life.

You deserve to be able to participate in your community, make your own decisions and live independently, regardless of your mobility impairment.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

When considering your vote in the New Zealand general election from the perspective of independent living, mobility access, and accessible public transport, different political parties present distinct frameworks and proposed changes.

A summary of how the major and prominent parties approach mobility access, transport infrastructure, and disability rights outlines what they intend to change:


Green Party

  • Public Transport Approach: Proposes that urban public transport be entirely fare-free, starting specifically with the disabled community.
  • Mobility & Infrastructure: Advocates that public transport and mobility infrastructure be co-designed with the disabled community, focusing targeted investments in both deprived urban and rural areas.
  • National Schemes: Proposes the development of a comprehensive national mobility scheme supported by infrastructure that meets universal accessibility standards.

Labour Party

  • Public Transport Approach: Focuses on fare affordability and consistency through regional mechanisms. Their policy platforms generally emphasize public transport network funding, building on previous expansions of half-price concessions and targeted community transport cards (such as Community Connect).
  • Housing and Support: Emphasizes rolling out and embedding the Enabling Good Lives approach across disability support services and increasing the stock of accessible public housing.

Te Pāti Māori

  • Accessibility and Transport: Advocates for an explicit rights-based approach, stating that public services, housing, and transport infrastructure must be fully accessible.
  • Core Changes: Emphasizes that decisions affecting whānau hauā (disabled Māori) and the wider disabled community must be co-designed and led by disabled people themselves ("nothing about us without us"). They also support ending minimum-wage exemptions for disabled workers to improve financial security.

New Zealand First

  • Built Environment & Standards: While they do not have an extensive standalone disability manifesto, New Zealand First has historically supported regulatory measures for accessibility. Notably, they have advanced legislative efforts like the Accessibility Standards Bill (via the parliamentary ballot/private member’s bill process) aimed at setting binding regulations for accessibility in the built and digital environments.

National Party / ACT New Zealand

  • Approach: While National and ACT generally do not feature dedicated, standalone disability manifestos, their policy focus regarding transport centers primarily on core roading infrastructure, economic management, and fiscal restraint.
  • Funding Context: Central government settings recently adjusted transport and funding schemes (such as ongoing framework adjustments to the Total Mobility scheme), with center-right parties generally prioritizing economic efficiency, localized council delivery, and targeted support rather than sweeping universal free fare structures.

Key Considerations for Your Independent Living:

As you weigh your options, you may want to look closely at:

  1. Transport Subsidies vs. Universal Access: Whether you prefer parties pushing for free/heavily discounted public transport (like the Greens) versus those focusing on structural funding adjustments.
  2. Enforceable Standards: Whether a party backs legally binding accessibility standards (such as an Accessibility Act or framework bills championed by smaller parties and advocacy groups like the Access Alliance) to ensure public spaces, rental housing, and transport fleets are legally required to be accessible.

Are there specific aspects of independent living—such as tenancy rights for renters, funding for in-home support, or local versus national transport services—that will weigh most heavily in your decision?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, several political parties have put forward distinct proposals addressing accessible public transport, the Total Mobility Scheme, and broader independence and housing support for disabled New Zealanders.

An overview of what key parties propose to change regarding public transport and mobility access highlights these distinct approaches:

The Green Party

  • Public Transport & Total Mobility: Pledges to restore the Total Mobility Scheme subsidy to 75%. Pledges to make public transport free for Total Mobility users (alongside children, students, apprentices, and Community Service Card holders), while capping bus and train fares at $2 for everyone else.

  • Broader Accessibility: Opposed the recent Disability Support Services Act and has pledged to introduce comprehensive disability rights legislation based on Te Tiriti with legally enforceable accessibility standards.

Labour Party

  • Public Transport & Total Mobility: Plans to introduce a national purpose statement and fare concessions for Total Mobility users, including free companion fares and standardized provider reviews via NZTA. Also proposes weekly caps on public transport costs nationwide.

  • Broader Independence & Housing: Aims to overhaul the Disability Support Services Act, legally enforce "reasonable accommodations," eliminate annual benefit renewals for permanent disabilities, and ensure 25% of new Kāinga Ora builds are fully accessible.

Te Pāti Māori

  • Public Transport & Total Mobility: Proposes a phased rollout to make public transport free for everyone within five years, prioritizing disabled individuals in the initial stages.

  • Broader Accessibility: Seeks to expand the Enabling Good Lives framework with localized funding and improved accessibility.

ACT New Zealand

  • Public Transport & Total Mobility: Supports maintaining the Total Mobility Scheme subsidy at 65% and focuses on fiscal sustainability alongside removing regulatory barriers.

  • Broader Accessibility: Backs individualized support structures via the Disability Support Services Act.

National Party (Incumbent)

  • Public Transport & Total Mobility: Maintains existing transport settings while rolling out the New Zealand Disability Strategy (2026–2030).

  • Broader Accessibility: Focuses on the implementation and administration of the recently passed Disability Support Services legislation.


You can review detailed breakdowns of party platforms and community-specific analyses on platforms likeThe D*List, or check individual party manifestos directly.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I have a mobility impairment, rent and want to keep living independently. I rely on accessible transport and support services. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which parties address accessible public transport and mobility access, and what would they change?

AI Overview

Major New Zealand political parties approach accessible public transport, housing, and disability support differently ahead of the 2026 general election:

Key Party Positions and Proposed Changes

  • Green Party

  • Transport & Mobility: Advocates for free public transport for Total Mobility cardholders, students, and children, plus a $2 fare cap for other passengers. They support restoring the Total Mobility scheme subsidy back to 75% and setting firm, enforceable timelines to make all public transport and infrastructure fully accessible.

  • Housing & Independent Living: Supports minimum accessibility targets (such as 15% accessible social housing new builds) and introducing a Te Tiriti-based disability rights law with enforceable accessibility standards.

  • Labour Party

  • Transport & Mobility: Proposes a nationwide public transport fare cap ($20 a week in major centers like Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch; $10 elsewhere).

  • Housing & Independent Living: Pledges to require at least 25% of new Kāinga Ora builds to be accessible, end annual benefit renewals for people with verified permanent disabilities, and repeal/redraft disability legislation in co-design with disabled people. They also plan to amend the Human Rights Act to explicitly define reasonable accommodation.

  • National Party (Current Government)

  • Transport & Mobility: Focuses on structural updates to the Total Mobility Scheme—including a new national purpose statement, a review of wheelchair-accessible vehicle per-trip payments by Waka Kotahi, and exploring free companion fares for Total Mobility users. They have not committed to universal free public transport or a 75% Total Mobility subsidy.

  • Housing & Independent Living: Relies on the refreshed Disability Strategy 2026–2030 and NZSL Strategy 2026–2036 , focusing on financial stabilization and choice in support funding, rather than introducing legally enforceable accessibility mandates for private or public builds.

  • Te Pāti Māori

  • Transport & Mobility: Supports working toward free public transport for everyone (prioritizing disabled people in a staged rollout) and returning the Total Mobility subsidy to 75%.

  • Housing & Independent Living: Advocates for a Māori-led authority to oversee disability services, removing access barriers across housing and health, and ensuring disability support is not siloed from wider social and income support.

  • ACT New Zealand

  • Transport & Mobility: Does not support free or heavily subsidized public transport or mandated accessibility quotas, focusing instead on general economic management and market-driven approaches.

  • Housing & Independent Living: Opposes new binding accessibility legislation or mandatory accessibility quotas for housing.

  • The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Transport & Mobility: Supports free or reduced-cost public transport options.

  • Housing & Independent Living: Proposes a universal basic income alongside a $6,000 annual universal disability allowance to help cover independent living and extra costs.

If you'd like to narrow this down, let me know:

  • Which region or city you live in (as local council-run public transport varies)
  • Whether housing security or daily transport/taxis is your top priority for your vote
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account