Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What financial recognition or support do parties propose for unpaid family carers?

Financial support for unpaid family carers in New Zealand – 2026 election

For someone working part time while providing daily care to an older family member, the key election issue is whether political parties will recognise unpaid caregiving as a contribution that deserves financial support, rather than treating it simply as a private family responsibility.

There are several distinct forms of support worth comparing:

  • Direct financial recognition: regular payments, a carer's allowance or a caregiver payment.
  • Income protection: help to compensate for reduced working hours, lost earnings and retirement savings.
  • Practical support: funded respite care, replacement carers and reliable in-home assistance.
  • Employment protection: flexible working arrangements and protection from financial disadvantage because of caring responsibilities.

An important distinction is that support for older people themselves (such as NZ Superannuation or subsidised aged care) is not necessarily financial recognition for the family member providing their care.

1. What the main parties are proposing

The following comparison distinguishes explicit election commitments from existing government programmes and broader statements of support.

Party Financial recognition for unpaid carers
National Has introduced a long-term carers' action plan and is developing a package that could include a carer payment, improved respite and practical support. No confirmed payment amount or universal entitlement yet.
Labour Has committed to restoring pay equity legislation and a $4-an-hour pay rise for approximately 65,000 employed care and support workers. This does not automatically pay unpaid family carers.
Green Party Supports stronger recognition and protections for family carers. Has committed to restoring pay equity legislation and funding a settlement for care and support workers.
ACT Emphasises individual responsibility, targeted welfare and individualised support. I have not identified a specific 2026 commitment to a regular payment for unpaid family carers.
New Zealand First Has a focus on older people and protecting superannuation, but I have not identified a specific published commitment to a universal unpaid-carer payment.
Te Pāti Māori Emphasises whānau wellbeing, Māori-led services and self-determination. I have not verified a specific 2026 payment amount or universal carer allowance.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Its wider income-support reform proposals are relevant to financial security, but I have not verified a specific commitment to a separate family-carer payment.

Important party commitments

National: a possible new carer payment

National's Government announced a new Mahi Aroha Carers' Strategy Action Plan on 2 September 2026.

It focuses on:

  • Health and wellbeing.
  • Financial security.
  • Recognition and appreciation.

The Government is also developing a family-carer support package. A carer payment is one option being considered, alongside better respite and other practical support.

However, this is still under development. It is not yet a guaranteed payment for people caring for older relatives. New roadmap for supporting unpaid carersImproving support for family carersQuestions and answers about improving carer support

Labour: better pay for professional care workers

Labour has announced:

  • Restoring pay equity legislation within its first 100 days.
  • A $4-per-hour pay rise from 1 January 2027 for approximately 65,000 care and support workers.
  • An estimated additional $8,320 annually for an average full-time worker.

This is a significant commitment to the paid care workforce, but it is important not to confuse paid employment in home support with unpaid family caregiving. Release: Labour to restore pay equity, immediate pay rise for care and support workersLabour's 2026 Election Policies

Green Party: pay equity and recognition of family carers

The Greens have also committed to restoring pay equity legislation and funding the settlement for care and support workers.

They have criticised the Government's Disability Support Services legislation for weakening employment protections and legal avenues for some family carers. The party says family carers deserve dignity, recognition and proper support.

That is a relevant position, although it is not the same as a published universal weekly payment for unpaid carers. Greens commit to pay equity for care workersGreens oppose rushed disability support law changes

2. What is particularly important about National's proposed carer payment?

This is arguably the most directly relevant financial proposal in the comparison.

The Ministry of Social Development and Disability Support Services are working on a package intended to recognise family carers financially and practically.

A carer payment is explicitly being considered, but several important questions remain unanswered:

  • Would people caring for elderly parents or partners qualify, or would it be restricted to disability-related caregiving?
  • Would people who work part time still qualify?
  • Would payment depend on the number of hours of care provided?
  • Would it be income-tested?
  • Would it compensate carers for lost earnings and KiwiSaver contributions?
  • Would it be a regular payment or a limited subsidy?

The Government's published information confirms that the package is still being developed and that existing arrangements have not yet changed. Improving support for family carersQuestions and answers about improving carer support

3. What support exists already?

It is worth distinguishing between current assistance and new election promises.

  • Carer Support: Funding intended to help eligible carers take a break from caring. It is respite funding, not a wage for the family carer.
  • Home and community support: Depending on the older person's assessed needs and eligibility, publicly funded help may be available with personal care and household tasks.
  • Needs assessments: Health New Zealand's assessment services can help identify the older person's support requirements.
  • Income support: Depending on your circumstances, existing Work and Income assistance may be relevant, although there is no universal caregiver allowance for everyone providing unpaid care.

The Government's own explanation makes clear that Carer Support funding cannot be used as payment for providing care. Questions and answers about improving carer supportThe New Zealand Carers' Strategy

4. What should you look for when deciding how to vote?

For your circumstances, I would give particular attention to five questions.

Question Why it matters
Is there a regular carer payment? Recognises the economic value of unpaid care.
Can part-time workers qualify? Avoids penalising people who maintain some employment.
Is respite guaranteed and adequately funded? Makes it possible to continue working and have personal time.
Is support available for elderly relatives? Avoids restricting assistance to disability-related caregiving.
Is there recognition of lost retirement savings? Addresses the long-term financial consequences of caring.

5. Useful sources to check before voting

These provide more detail and allow you to check new announcements:

My overall assessment

There is a significant gap between recognising unpaid carers in principle and providing them with meaningful financial support.

National has the clearest current government initiative specifically exploring a carer payment. Labour and the Greens have more concrete financial commitments for employed care workers, but these do not directly compensate unpaid family carers.

For someone who works part time and provides daily care to an older relative, I would not treat a promise to improve the paid care workforce as equivalent to a promise to financially recognise family carers.

The biggest question to put to every party is:

Will you introduce a regular, government-funded payment for people who provide substantial unpaid care to an elderly family member, including those who work part time, and when will it become available?

That question would help distinguish genuine financial recognition from general expressions of appreciation.

I would also pay particular attention to whether the proposed support covers older people who need daily assistance because of ageing, rather than only people who meet disability funding criteria. That distinction could make a substantial difference to your household.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What financial recognition or support do parties propose for unpaid family carers?

Balancing part-time work with daily, unpaid caregiving for a family member is demanding, and the lack of reliable support is a central issue for many caregivers across New Zealand.

For the 2026 general election, political parties have put forward various proposals touching on financial security, welfare, healthcare, and disability/carer support. While specific policies directly targeting a universal wage for all informal family carers vary, several key approaches and platform proposals stand out:

1. Income Support, Welfare, and Cost-of-Living Relief

  • Green Party: Focuses heavily on recognizing unpaid care and whānau support as valuable labor. Their platform includes lifting main benefit levels to a liveable income, removing work-test obligations and financial sanctions, individualizing benefits so support is not dependent on a partner's or family member's income, and providing easily accessible income support to cover disability-related living and medical costs.
  • The Opportunity Party (TOP): Proposes introducing a "Citizens’ Income and Disability Allowance" to provide better financial security and allow support networks and disabled individuals/carers to work or earn supplementary income without losing their baseline support.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Advocates for broader structural changes to reduce poverty and increase income security for whānau hauā and caregivers, including tax-free income thresholds (such as tax-free status on the first $30,000 per annum).

2. Support for Formal and Paid Family Care Models

  • Labour Party: Has a strong focus on the health and care workforce, committing to measures like restoring pay equity and boosting wages for care and support workers. While formal "paid family care" policies often have strict criteria regarding who can be a formally employed support worker for a family member, broader enhancements to healthcare access—such as free GP visits via a new Medicard system and free prescriptions—aim to ease the indirect medical and financial strain on caregiving households.

3. Respite and System Navigation

  • Carer Support Subsidy & Flexible Funding: System-level funding (such as Carer Support subsidies administered through Health New Zealand / Te Whatu Ora to give full-time carers a break) operates under ongoing operational guidelines. Parties aligned with disability sector reforms (such as the Greens and TOP) generally advocate for strengthening the Enabling Good Lives framework, ensuring that respite funding is more flexible, less bureaucratic, and properly reflects the actual intensity of care provided.
  • Streamlining Services: Parties like TOP have emphasized "Tell Us Once" cross-agency data integration between health, welfare, and social support to reduce the administrative burden on families who constantly have to repeat their stories to access relief.

What this means for your vote:

When evaluating your options, you may want to look closely at whether parties are offering direct financial recognition (such as allowances or caregiver-specific payments), indirect relief (like free primary healthcare, lower living costs, or higher abatement thresholds so your part-time income isn't penalized), or structural respite improvements to guarantee reliable daily backup.

Are you looking for details on a specific party's platform, or would you like to explore how current carer support subsidies and respite options work practically while you navigate the election?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What financial recognition or support do parties propose for unpaid family carers?

Navigating part-time work alongside daily, unpaid caregiving is a significant balancing act, and support for unpaid and family carers is a prominent topic in the 2026 general election context. Recent legislative changes—such as the passage of the Disability Support Services Act and the rollout of the cross-government Mahi Aroha Carers' Strategy Action Plan—have placed the financial security, health, and legal recognition of carers under the spotlight.

Major political party approaches and stances regarding financial recognition, legal status, and systemic support for unpaid family carers feature distinct perspectives:

  • National Party / Governing-Led Frameworks : Emphasizes the ongoing implementation of the Mahi Aroha Carers' Strategy Action Plan managed via the Ministry of Social Development. This framework focuses on long-term outcomes across health, financial security, and appreciation, while supporting the legislative baseline established through recent changes to disability and support services administration.

  • Labour Party : Has committed to repealing and redrafting the recent Disability Support Services legislation, stating an intent to work directly with disabled people, whānau, and family carers to build a more rights-based framework that addresses funding and carer support concerns.

  • Green Party : Opposed recent restrictive support legislation due to a lack of community and carer consultation. Their broader platform advocates for stronger enforceable rights, increased resourcing for community and home-based support, and broader systemic safety nets that reduce financial pressure on informal and family carers.

  • Te Pāti Māori : Voted against the recent disability and carer support legislation and advocates for an investment approach grounded in Enabling Good Lives kaupapa, emphasizing whānau-centered resourcing and autonomy for those providing home-based care.

  • ACT and New Zealand First : Generally lean toward administrative clarity, standardized service contracting, and fiscal restraint within health and social support sectors, balancing individual family support models with broader economic management.

To explore specific policy details or check your local electorate candidate meetings to ask direct questions about carer stipends and financial relief, you can visit the official Elections NZ portal or community advocacy breakdowns like The DList Disability Policy Summary. Party policies, simplified: Disability policy | The DList

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work part time and provide unpaid care for an older family member who needs help every day. Getting reliable support is difficult. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What financial recognition or support do parties propose for unpaid family carers?

AI Overview

Political party proposals for the 2026 general election offer differing approaches to financial recognition for unpaid family carers. While the major parties largely frame carer support through the lens of wider healthcare funding, pay equity for the professional workforce, or structural welfare overhauls, some minor parties have proposed direct cash supplements or allowances.

Navigating the landscape reveals distinct variations in how each political group plans to address financial security and relief:

Party Policies on Carer Recognition & Disability Funding

Political Party Primary Proposed Approach for Unpaid Carers & Disability Support
Labour Repealing current funding limits & boosting paid workforce. Pledges to repeal the Disability Support Services Act 2026 to rebuild a rights-based framework with carer input. It has also committed to restoring professional care worker pay equity legislation, offering an immediate $4/hour pay rise to formal support workers, which aims to address the structural shortages you are experiencing in finding reliable external help.
National System stabilization & existing flexible funding. Focuses on the financial stabilization and national consistency of the Disability Support Services (DSS) framework. Rather than launching new direct financial handouts for family carers, the policy centers on managing the existing system through the revised flexible-purchasing arrangements implemented in April 2026, which allow pre-approved allocations to be used more flexibly for respite.
Green Party Income support tied to true costs. Advocates for providing easily accessible and timely income support to fully cover disability and care-related living and medical costs. Their platform supports removing relationship-status testing from benefit rules so that a carer’s or partner's independent relationship status does not penalize their baseline financial support.
The Opportunities Party (TOP) Universal Basic Income & Disability Supplements. Proposes a major structural welfare reform through a universal "Citizens' Income" benefit of up to $370 weekly to replace current base benefits. This is paired with a proposed $6,000 annual universal disability/carer allowance designed explicitly to ensure unpaid carers are financially insulated and not penalized for doing part-time paid work.
NZ First Person-centered funding. Advocates for flexible, person-centered funding models and informed self-assessment over rigid central bureaucracy, keeping a focus on seniors' care and health services generally rather than a standalone carer manifesto.
ACT Individualized funding. Favors smaller government intervention, supporting direct individualized funding lines that put money into individual hands while reducing overall state bureaucracy.

Understanding Current Avenues for Support

Regardless of how you choose to vote, you may already be eligible for existing avenues of financial recognition under current New Zealand frameworks.

  • Funded Family Care: Depending on the needs of the older person you are supporting, family members in New Zealand can be formally employed as paid support workers. If the person you care for qualifies for government-funded Home Support Services (via a needs assessment), you may be able to be paid for a portion of the daily tasks you complete.

  • Carer Support / Respite Allocations: The flexible-purchasing arrangements allow for an allocated budget to take a wellbeing break. However, as advocacy groups like Carers NZ emphasize, funding "on paper" does not automatically solve workforce shortages if a replacement worker cannot be found.

If you would like to explore your immediate options while weighing election policies, let me know:

  • Has your family member already received a Needs Assessment through a local Needs Assessment and Service Coordination (NASC) agency?

  • Are you looking for information on how to transition into a paid Whānau Carer role under current rules?

I can help provide the specific steps to maximize your current support.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account