Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

For the 2026 New Zealand general election, I would focus on three questions that are particularly important for smaller towns:

  1. Will children be able to attend a local school, rather than travel long distances to another community?
  2. Will schools be able to recruit and retain qualified teachers, including when they have small rolls and limited local employment opportunities?
  3. Will children with additional learning needs receive support locally, rather than families having to travel to larger centres for assessments and specialist services?

There are meaningful differences between the parties. Some emphasise additional classroom staffing, others specialist learning support, and others community control and long-term education planning.

1. What the parties are proposing

The following is based on policies and announcements available as at 1 November 2026. Some parties have released more detailed proposals than others.

Labour

Strong focus on practical rural access

Labour is proposing:

  • 1,000 additional teacher aides, at an estimated cost of $80 million over four years, to provide more individual support for children.
  • Restoring rural school bus services where possible, working with communities to find practical alternatives where restoration isn't possible.
  • Reinstating school lunches, with local schools, iwi, hapū and caterers involved in providing meals.
  • An independent Council for Curriculum and Assessment, and a pause on parts of the current curriculum and NCEA changes.
  • Working towards pay parity for early childhood teachers and smaller teacher-to-child ratios.

What this could mean for smaller towns: Restoring rural transport could make a significant difference to families who depend on school buses. Additional teacher aides could also improve support for children in smaller schools.

However, Labour has not clearly promised to prevent small rural schools from closing or set out a comprehensive plan for recruiting teachers to isolated communities. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans

National

Focus on school readiness and learning support

National proposes:

  • Learning Support Coordinators for all schools with Year 1–8 students from 2028.
  • Two million additional teacher-aide hours annually from 2028, with training to support children with behavioural, emotional and neurodiverse needs.
  • School Start Checks to identify children's strengths and additional support requirements.
  • Expanded Early Intervention Services.
  • Improved school property, including more warm and dry classrooms.
  • Requiring students to remain at school until they complete Year 11 or turn 16, whichever is later.

What this could mean for smaller towns: The additional teacher-aide hours and Learning Support Coordinators could make a real difference to children who currently struggle to access support.

An important question, however, is how these services will operate in very small schools. Will a coordinator be physically available locally, or will they be shared across several schools?

National's published proposals do not provide a specific guarantee against rural school closures or a dedicated teacher-retention package for small communities. Teaching the basics brilliantly2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans

Green Party

Strong focus on inclusion and specialist support

The Greens propose:

  • Expanding eligibility for learning support.
  • Establishing a single agency to coordinate and resource support for students with disabilities and additional needs.
  • Improving access to diagnosis and specialist services.
  • Supporting educators through fair wages and staffing levels that allow quality teaching.
  • Developing a long-term education workforce plan with the education sector.
  • Making early childhood education free.
  • Expanding school lunches, with an emphasis on locally made food.

What this could mean for smaller towns: The proposed coordinated learning-support system could help families who currently have to navigate multiple services or travel to larger centres.

The workforce plan is also relevant because attracting and retaining teachers is difficult when communities have fewer employment opportunities for partners and limited access to services.

The outstanding question is how the Greens would fund and deliver specialist services in isolated communities, including whether specialists would visit local schools regularly. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans

ACT

ACT's education proposals focus more on school choice, classroom discipline and alternative education provision.

Its proposals include:

  • Encouraging more state and state-integrated schools to become charter schools.
  • A target of 10,000 charter-school enrolments by the end of 2029.
  • Giving teachers explicit powers to remove seriously or persistently disruptive students from classrooms.
  • An Open Seat Rule allowing children to use an existing school bus route when seats are available, regardless of which school they attend.

What this could mean for smaller towns: The Open Seat Rule could make existing transport more useful to families.

However, charter-school expansion does not in itself guarantee the continued existence of a local state school. ACT's published proposals offer less detail on additional learning-support services and attracting teachers to isolated communities. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy AnalysisPolicies for Party vote - NZ Election 2026

New Zealand First

NZ First's available 2026 education proposals are less comprehensive than those of some other parties.

A September 2026 party-signed education response proposes:

  • Early childhood education improvements.
  • Retaining the 20 hours of free ECE.
  • An independent Curriculum Council.
  • Stronger vocational and trades pathways.

Its earlier published education policy also identifies rural and isolated communities as important, with proposals concerning rural early childhood services, Learning Support Coordinators, counsellors and support for children with dyslexia, autism and other learning needs.

What this could mean for smaller towns: Its earlier policy positions recognise that isolated communities can lose access to education services. However, I would want to see these commitments reaffirmed in a fully costed 2026 programme before treating them as current election promises. 2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans2023 Election Policies

The Opportunities Party (TOP)

TOP proposes:

  • A 10-year, cross-party education plan to provide stability.
  • Better access to specialist support, including learning-support coordinators, speech-language therapists, psychologists and mental-health services.
  • Support for teachers and improved staffing.
  • Better early childhood education standards.
  • Stronger connections between academic and vocational education.

What this could mean for smaller towns: The idea of making specialist services available to every school is particularly relevant to families who must currently travel to access assessments and support.

The long-term education plan could also reduce disruption caused by successive governments changing education policy.

However, TOP needs to provide more detail on funding, staffing and how specialist services would actually reach small communities. Election 2026: Political Parties Policy Analysis2026 NZ election campaign guide, policies & fiscal plans

Te Pāti Māori

Te Pāti Māori's education policy emphasises:

  • Establishing a Māori-led education authority.
  • Supporting Māori governance and decision-making in education.
  • Embedding mātauranga Māori in learning.
  • Removing barriers that prevent whānau from accessing education and training.

What this could mean for smaller towns: This approach may be particularly relevant to communities with Māori-medium education, kura kaupapa Māori and whānau seeking greater local control over education.

The key question is how these proposals would be resourced and how they would support the ongoing availability of local education services. Education & TrainingTeachers, schools and the election

2. Comparing the proposals against your priorities

Here is how I would organise the available policies when considering the circumstances of a smaller community.

Your priority Parties with relevant proposals
More teacher aides Labour, National
Learning support and disability services Greens, National, TOP
Better access to rural schools Labour, ACT (school transport)
Teacher workforce and retention Greens, TOP, Labour (particularly ECE)
Long-term education stability TOP, Labour, Greens
Local Māori education authority and decision-making Te Pāti Māori
Alternative school models ACT
Rural early childhood access NZ First (earlier policy), Greens, Labour

One important distinction: there is a difference between promising more education funding and guaranteeing that a small community can actually access the service.

A teacher aide funded nationally, for example, is only useful if the school can recruit someone to fill the position.

3. The underlying problem: teacher shortages

This isn't simply a theoretical concern.

The Ministry of Education's 2025 Teacher Demand and Supply Planning Projection, published in 2026, identifies significant regional differences.

It projects:

  • Persistent primary teacher shortages in Northland, Waikato, Taranaki and Bay of Plenty.
  • Ongoing secondary teacher shortages in most regions.
  • Particular recruitment challenges for smaller rural schools and Māori-medium education.

This matters because a national increase in teacher numbers doesn't automatically solve the problem of getting teachers into smaller communities. 2025 Teacher Demand and Supply Planning Projection

Home

New Zealand's smallest school back in business after five-year absence

Gallery

8

4. Questions I would want every party to answer

Given that you work in a small town, your family travels long distances for services, and local employment opportunities are limited, I would look beyond headline education promises.

These are the questions I think deserve particular attention:

Keeping local schools open

  • Will you protect small rural schools from closure where they remain important to their communities?
  • Will decisions consider the cost and travel burden on families, not just the financial cost per pupil?
  • Will local communities have a meaningful say before a closure or merger?

Attracting and retaining teachers

  • Will you offer incentives for teachers to work in isolated communities?
  • How will you help teachers' partners find employment?
  • Will you provide professional development and career opportunities without requiring teachers to leave their communities?
  • Will small schools receive sufficient staffing even when their student numbers are low?

Learning support

  • Will speech-language therapists, educational psychologists and other specialists visit smaller communities?
  • Can children receive assessments locally?
  • Will teacher aides be funded according to children's actual needs?
  • How will you reduce waiting times for children requiring specialist help?

Access and transport

  • Will school buses be available to children attending different schools?
  • Will funding recognise the extra transport costs faced by rural families?
  • Will children be able to participate in extracurricular activities without parents having to drive long distances?

5. My assessment

I wouldn't choose a party based on one education announcement alone.

Looking at the specific issues you have raised, I would pay particular attention to these differences:

  • Labour: Has particularly tangible proposals on rural school transport and additional teacher aides.
  • Greens: Have a strong emphasis on inclusive education, disability support and the educator workforce.
  • National: Has specific commitments to Learning Support Coordinators and additional teacher-aide hours.
  • TOP: Offers an interesting long-term approach to education stability and access to specialists.
  • NZ First: Has historically recognised the importance of rural and isolated education services, but needs clearer current commitments.
  • ACT: Has a transport proposal worth considering, but less detail on maintaining local state-school provision.
  • Te Pāti Māori: Offers a distinct approach centred on Māori-led education and local decision-making.

These are policy comparisons, not endorsements. Actual outcomes will also depend on funding, implementation and coalition agreements.

6. One particularly important consideration for your vote

I think your circumstances raise a broader question that deserves to be part of your election decision:

Should people living in smaller towns have to accept a lower standard of access to essential services simply because they don't live in a major city?

Education is connected to that question. When a local school closes, it can affect more than children's education. It can make it harder for young families to remain in the community, reduce local employment, and make the town less attractive to new residents.

A school is often an important part of the social and economic infrastructure of a small town.

For a useful independent comparison, I would also recommend Policy.nz's 2026 election education comparison and CCS Disability Action's October 2026 party policy analysis.

My suggestion: When assessing the parties, give particular weight to whether they have specific, funded commitments to keeping education accessible in smaller communities, rather than simply promising improvements to the national education system.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

For families living in smaller towns and regional New Zealand, educational access, teacher resourcing, and learning support are critical issues—particularly given the distances involved in accessing services.

The major political parties approaches to retaining rural and small-town schools, supporting teachers, and expanding learning support reflect distinct strategies:


1. School Transport and Infrastructure (Accessibility for Small Towns)

Because families in smaller towns often have to travel further or face strict zoning requirements for transport, school logistics are a key battleground:

  • ACT Party: Proposed an "Open Seat Rule" for rural school buses. This policy aims to allow any child living along an existing school bus route to use the service if there is a spare seat available, regardless of whether they attend the "nearest" school or a slightly further choice. The rationale is to ease transport pressures for rural families without wasting existing infrastructure.
  • National / Coalition Government Focus: Current settings emphasize strict adherence to the nearest-school criteria for funded transport, though regional transport resilience and local roading networks remain a core priority for maintaining connection between smaller hubs and service centers.

2. Learning Support and Teacher Aides

Small-town schools often struggle to access visiting specialists (like speech therapists or educational psychologists) locally, placing heavy reliance on classroom teachers and teacher aides.

  • Labour Party: Pledged to fund an extra 1,000 teacher aides over four years ($80 million) to provide more individual, hands-on support for students who need it, which is intended to help resource smaller schools that lack specialized on-site teams.
  • National Party: Focused heavily on early identification through a School Start Check in Early Childhood Education (ECE) or upon school entry. The goal is to connect children needing additional support with Early Intervention Services before they fall behind in primary school, aiming to catch learning or developmental hurdles early.
  • Green Party / Te Pāti Māori: Emphasize systemic reform for inclusive education, with Te Pāti Māori proposing a dedicated Māori-led taskforce to transform how neurodivergent students and students with disabilities are supported, alongside broader calls for universal learning support entitlements.

3. Teacher Workforce, Retention, and School Stability

Attracting and retaining qualified teachers in provincial and rural areas is a persistent challenge for small-town schools.

  • Broader Workforce Commitments: Various parties have put forward proposals targeting teacher supply, such as expanding "train-while-you-study" pathways (allowing trainee teachers to stay local rather than moving to major university centers) and addressing cost-of-living pressures through student loan adjustments.
  • Curriculum and Stability: Major parties differ on curriculum timelines—the current National-led government is rolling out structured basics and updated curricula, while opposition parties like Labour and the Greens have advocated for cross-party long-term planning or pauses to reduce constant administrative churn on already stretched rural teaching staff.

Summary Table: Key Angles by Party

Party Key Small-Town / Rural Education Focus Learning Support & Resourcing Approach
ACT Focus on practical flexibility, such as the Open Seat Rule for underutilized rural school bus capacity. Focus on classroom management tools (e.g., powers to remove disruptive students) to ease teacher workload.
Labour Focus on regional equity and workforce expansion. Pledges 1,000 additional teacher aides nationwide to backstop individual student needs.
National Focus on early identification via School Start Checks and developmental milestones before/upon school entry. Directs support into formal Early Intervention Services pipeline.
Greens / Te Pāti Māori Focus on community-led provision, public funding protection, and localized resourcing. Overhauling support frameworks for neurodivergent and disabled learners via targeted taskforces.

Are you looking at how these policies might directly impact a specific age group (like early childhood vs. secondary), or are you more interested in how local healthcare and job access factor into your broader voting decision?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

When considering how political parties approach schooling, teacher recruitment, and learning support in smaller communities and provincial towns, different parties emphasize distinct mechanisms—ranging from universal resourcing and workforce incentives to community-based planning or specialized coordination.

An overview of general approaches and proposals from major New Zealand political parties regarding these regional and localized education needs highlights several key themes:

  • National Party : Focuses heavily on core academic basics ("teaching the basics brilliantly" with an hour daily of reading, writing, and maths), expanding structured learning support, and placing Learning Support Coordinators across schools. Their framework generally targets system-wide consistency, standardized reporting, infrastructure quality (warm, dry classrooms), and workforce policies intended to apply across both urban and provincial settings.

  • Labour Party : Emphasizes network planning and community-backed infrastructure, aiming to protect and resource smaller or localized educational providers (including early learning and regional networks). They generally focus on equitable funding, addressing teacher supply through workforce support, and restoring centralized network planning to prevent the erosion of educational access in smaller or remote areas.

  • Green Party : Advocates for expanding the criteria to access learning support and establishing a dedicated, centralized single agency to coordinate and resource specialist health and disability support for learners. For smaller communities, their approach leans toward lowering systemic barriers and ensuring specialist resources (such as educational psychologists and needs assessors) are reliably dispatched outside major urban centers.

  • ACT New Zealand : Tends to focus on school operational flexibility, parental choice, and accountability measures rather than centralized geographic mandates. Their educational policies often emphasize structural or regulatory reforms to the schooling system, aiming to give individual school boards and communities more autonomy over how they manage resources.

  • Te Pāti Māori / New Zealand First : Te Pāti Māori highlights culturally grounded learning support and addressing systemic exclusions for neurodiverse or disabled students through targeted, localized frameworks. New Zealand First historically emphasizes regional and provincial resilience, supporting local infrastructure to ensure smaller towns retain functional public services like schools.

Key Considerations for Small-Town Voters

When evaluating these platforms against the realities of a small town—where traveling long distances limits easy access to visiting specialists or alternative schools—you may want to look specifically at:

  1. Specialist Itinerant Support: How parties propose getting speech language therapists, educational psychologists, and learning support coordinators physically or digitally into remote and provincial schools rather than concentrating them in main cities.
  2. Workforce Recruitment/Retention: Incentives proposed by parties to attract and retain registered teachers and specialist staff in areas facing housing or localized labor constraints.
  3. Network Protection: Whether a party's policy framework actively protects small rural or provincial school rolls from funding drops when local demographics fluctuate.
Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I work in a small town rather than farming. My family drives long distances for services, and local jobs and healthcare are limited. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What do parties propose about retaining schools, teachers and learning support in smaller communities?

AI Overview

Political party approaches in New Zealand regarding rural and small-town schools, teacher recruitment, and learning support include:

  • Labour Party: Proposes funding 1,000 extra teacher aides , bringing back rural school buses where possible (or working with local communities on transport solutions), capping school uniform costs to three branded items, expanding school lunch programs, and pausing/resetting current curriculum and NCEA changes through an independent body.

  • National Party: Emphasizes expanding structured literacy, math acceleration programs, and introducing initiatives like the Go Rural: Isolated Placements Fund (providing a $4,000 grant per student teacher for block placements in rural/isolated schools). They also propose raising the school leaving age requirement to complete Year 11.

  • ACT Party: Focuses on expanding charter schools with a goal of a charter school or conversion option in every town/region, giving teachers explicit legal powers to remove disruptive students, and providing Year 11 students with $500 investment accounts.

  • Green Party: Proposes co-designing a long-term workforce plan with the sector, providing universal weekly payments and relocation grants for essential trainees, abolishing the training wage, and working toward a representative model of school board governance with a national support agency.

  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes establishing a Māori Education Authority , funding free school counselling/mental wellbeing support, expanding school lunches, and creating a Māori-led taskforce specifically to transform learning support for neurodivergent students and students with learning differences.

You can explore detailed side-by-side policy comparisons using the Policy.nz Education Policy Guide or read summaries via RNZ's Election 2026 Education Policy Guide.

If you'd like, let me know:

  • What specific challenge is most urgent for your family (e.g., transport/buses, teacher shortages, or learning/disability support)?
  • Which region or school type you are looking at?

I can help break down how different party platforms address those exact priorities.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account