Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

2026 New Zealand election: What would parties do about electricity costs for your café?

For a small café, electricity is a particularly important cost: refrigeration, coffee machines, ovens, dishwashers, lighting and heating all need power, often throughout the day.

The key distinction between the parties is whether they would try to lower electricity prices through competition and private investment, or through greater government involvement and public ownership.

There is some agreement across the major parties that New Zealand needs more electricity and more affordable power. However, their proposed solutions differ considerably.

One important qualification: the policies below are election promises and party positions, not guaranteed outcomes. Also, most of the headline electricity assistance is aimed at households rather than providing an immediate discount on small-business power bills.

1. Comparing the parties

Party Main electricity proposals Potential relevance to your café
National Build more generation, speed up renewable projects, increase competition and improve electricity affordability regulation. Supports gas and LNG backup. Could reduce wholesale price pressure over time. Easier solar installation and greater competition could help businesses.
Labour $160m SolarSaver programme, stronger action against excessive pricing and support for business electrification. Potential help if you own your premises or can install solar. Stronger scrutiny of energy companies could benefit customers, although direct café assistance is not clearly specified.
Greens Establish Kiwipower, a publicly owned renewable electricity generator, alongside community energy investment and zero-interest clean-energy loans. Could offer a longer-term route to more stable renewable electricity. However, the proposed household solar loans should not be mistaken for an available café subsidy.
ACT Encourage private investment, reduce regulatory barriers, improve electricity-market competition and support gas/LNG backup. Could make it easier to install small commercial solar and batteries, with lower regulatory costs.
NZ First Separate electricity generation from retail, breaking up the major power companies. Develop a national energy strategy and increase domestic energy supply. Intended to improve competition and pricing power. Whether separating the companies would lower your actual commercial tariff is uncertain.
The Opportunity Party (TOP) Major renewable electricity expansion, targeting 30GW of capacity by 2050, alongside electricity-market reform. More renewable generation could improve long-term supply and affordability, but the benefits would take time.
Te Pāti Māori Invest in community-owned renewable generation, solar and energy storage through greater Māori energy ownership. Could support locally owned renewable electricity projects and community energy independence, although there is no clear direct café bill discount.

Sources: MinterEllison's October 2026 party comparison, PowerCompare's election policy summary, and Electrification NZ's party policy tracker. The politics of power: Comparing energy policies ahead of Election 2026Power Prices for 2026NZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026

2. What the policies could mean in practice

There are three particularly important differences for a small business.

A. Lowering the underlying cost of electricity

  • National and ACT believe increased supply, private investment and competition will help bring prices down.
  • Labour wants stronger regulatory intervention against excessive pricing.
  • The Greens want public ownership of additional generation.
  • NZ First wants to restructure the major electricity companies.

These are different approaches to the same problem: whether electricity prices are being kept too high by insufficient supply, market structure or inadequate regulation.

B. Helping businesses generate their own electricity

Solar panels and batteries could reduce your dependence on electricity purchased from a retailer.

  • National supports removing planning barriers to small-scale renewable generation.
  • ACT supports simplifying procedures for small commercial solar.
  • Labour has expressed support for partnering with businesses to electrify, although its main SolarSaver programme is household-focused.
  • The Greens and Te Pāti Māori support community renewable generation and storage.

A particularly important question is whether your café owns its building. If you rent, the landlord may control whether solar panels can be installed.

C. Improving competition and protecting customers

This matters if you feel your electricity provider has too much pricing power.

  • Labour proposes stronger Commerce Commission powers against excessive pricing.
  • NZ First wants to separate generation from retail.
  • National and ACT favour improving competition within the existing market structure.

None of these approaches guarantees an immediate reduction in your café's electricity bill. Power Prices for 2026NZ Political Party Energy Policies — 2026The politics of power: Comparing energy policies ahead of Election 2026

3. Which policies deserve the closest attention from a café owner?

Given your situation, I would focus on these five questions rather than simply which party promises cheaper electricity.

What matters to your business What to look for
Monthly electricity bill Specific measures to reduce commercial tariffs, not just household bills
Refrigeration and kitchen equipment Grants, tax deductions or low-interest finance for energy-efficient equipment
Solar and batteries Financial support available to small businesses, including tenants
Electricity supplier competition Measures that make commercial electricity contracts more competitive
Business security Separate commitments on burglary prevention, policing and support for businesses affected by crime

One significant policy gap: I haven't found a clear, substantial cross-party commitment to directly subsidise electricity bills for independent cafés. Much of the discussion concerns household electricity or longer-term changes to the electricity market.

4. My assessment

If electricity costs are your biggest concern:

  • National and ACT are worth examining if you favour market competition, private investment and easier commercial solar installation.
  • Labour is worth examining if you favour stronger regulation of electricity companies and government-supported business electrification.
  • The Greens are worth examining if you favour public investment in renewable generation and longer-term structural changes to electricity supply.
  • NZ First is worth examining if you believe the structure of the large electricity companies is a major reason for high prices.
  • TOP is worth examining if you prioritise a major renewable generation expansion.
  • Te Pāti Māori is worth examining if community ownership of energy and local renewable generation are important to you.

I wouldn't claim that any one of these parties will necessarily give your café the cheapest electricity. That depends on how the policies are funded, implemented and translated into commercial electricity prices.

5. Three questions I'd put to your local candidates

  1. Will you introduce a specific electricity cost-relief scheme for small businesses, rather than just households?
  2. Will you provide grants or tax incentives for independent cafés to install solar, batteries and energy-efficient refrigeration?
  3. What will you do to reduce commercial electricity prices over the next two years, rather than waiting for additional generation to come online?

You can also compare the parties' wider commitments at Policy.nz.

One question that would help narrow this down

Do you own or rent your café premises?

That makes quite a difference. If you own the building, solar and battery investment may be realistic. If you rent, policies around landlord cooperation, commercial energy support and direct electricity price reductions become much more important.

I can use that distinction to give you a more practical comparison of which parties' proposals could actually improve your café's financial position.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

Running a café under those conditions is an immense strain—between tight margins, consumer spending fatigue, and the stress of a break-in, overhead costs like power hit particularly hard.

As New Zealand heads into the 2026 general election, political parties have outlined starkly different approaches to addressing the country's electricity market, pricing, and generation. While many residential energy policies explicitly target households or renters, the parties' broader market strategies directly affect commercial and small business power costs.

The main political parties propose the following approaches regarding electricity costs and market structures:

1. National Party (Electrify NZ 2.0 / Current Government Actions)

  • Market Competition & Rules: Focuses on increasing overall electricity supply and boosting market competition. Recent regulatory settings from the Electricity Authority prevent the major "gentailers" (generation-retailers) from unfairly favouring their own retail arms when supplying hedge contracts, aiming to put downward pressure on wholesale pricing.
  • Streamlining Infrastructure: Aims to cut planning restrictions on small-scale renewables and speed up transmission and generation infrastructure to lower costs through market abundance.
  • Security & Supply: Backs a mix of renewables and backup security (including domestic gas development and LNG import options) to insulate the grid from dry-year hydro shocks that spike spot prices.

2. Labour Party

  • Consumer Protection & Regulation: Proposes giving market regulators (like the Commerce Commission) stronger teeth to crack down on excessive pricing and market power in essential sectors, alongside broader crackdowns on "price gouging".
  • Targeted Electrification & Solar: While major elements of their direct funding (like the SolarSaver scheme) lean toward households, community batteries, and renters, Labour also advocates partnering with businesses for industrial and commercial electrification support to transition away from expensive fossil fuels.

3. Green Party

  • Public Intervention & "Kiwipower": Proposes establishing a state-backed public generation company (Kiwipower) to directly build renewable generation, break heavy corporate market concentration, and guarantee lower-cost supply for independent market participants.
  • Targeted Capital Support: Focuses heavily on zero-interest clean energy, solar, and battery loans, alongside community-owned renewable funding.

4. New Zealand First

  • Structural Breakup of Gentailers: Proposes a major intervention to structurally separate electricity generation from retail arms (breaking up the integrated gentailers) to eliminate perceived conflict of interest and reduce retail power bills for consumers and businesses.
  • Regional & Industrial Focus: Proposes large-scale regional development and energy mapping initiatives (such as special economic zones) to boost domestic energy security.

5. ACT Party

  • Red Tape Reduction Over Subsidies: Opposes government subsidies or direct intervention, arguing instead that power prices are best managed by removing regulatory and resource-management hurdles to let the market freely build generation. They argue that if alternative energy makes financial sense, businesses and households will adopt it naturally without state-backed loan schemes.

What this means for a small café owner:

  • If you want direct market intervention or structural breakups to force power companies to change how they price power, parties like New Zealand First or the Greens offer the most aggressive structural shifts.
  • If you prefer increasing supply and competition through regulatory tweaks and easing generation bottlenecks, National's approach is tailored toward market-led abundance.
  • If you are looking for stricter watchdog powers to penalize high corporate margins, Labour highlights consumer and business regulatory protections.
Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

Running a café under current economic conditions—balancing tight margins, shifting consumer spending, and the added stress of a break-in—presents a heavy load. As New Zealand heads toward the November 7, 2026 general election, political parties have outlined distinct approaches to the energy market, grid access, and lowering electricity costs for households and small businesses.

The primary policy directions proposed by major political parties regarding electricity and power prices include:

National Party

  • Self-Generation & Solar Access: Focuses on helping small businesses and households become more energy-independent through on-site generation. Plans to allow off-the-shelf sales of plug-in solar panels and remove resource consent requirements for rooftop solar installations to cut regulatory red tape and installation friction.

  • Financing Resilience: Proposes funding vehicles (like the Home Energy Fund framework) to back long-term loans for energy upgrades and resilience investments.

  • Planning Streamlining: Streamlines national rules for small-scale renewables to make commercial or micro-generation easier to implement on-site.

Labour Party

  • Market Intervention & Generation Security: Focuses on boosting renewable supply while opposing fossil-fuel expansions like LNG import terminals. Proposes examining back-up generation security (such as looking closely at a fourth Rankine unit at Huntly running on bioenergy) to avoid price spikes during dry winters.

  • Community & Distributed Storage: Proposes a $30 million community battery fund and plug-in solar initiatives aimed at broader localized savings, though targeting residential/renters heavily alongside broader grid stability.

New Zealand First

  • Market Structural Reform: Proposes a direct structural intervention by breaking up the major "gentailers" (generators-retailers), splitting generation assets from retail arms to eliminate perceived double-control over power and pricing.

  • Supply Regulation: Aims to reform the electricity market framework to prevent suppliers from withholding generation capacity to artificially drive up wholesale spot prices, alongside guaranteeing long-term fixed-price contracts for new builds.

ACT New Zealand

  • Competition & Transmission Opening: Emphasizes market competition by opening transmission infrastructure to private investment—allowing private operators to build and run connections to the national grid.

  • Access Rights: Focuses on strengthening enforcement against market power misuse and allowing smoother customer-funded grid connection work to break infrastructure bottlenecks.

Green Party

  • Kiwipower & Public Enterprise: Proposes establishing a state-owned entity called "Kiwipower" to actively fill market gaps, accelerate the renewable transition, and target cheaper bills.

  • Distributed Solar: Legalizing plug-in solar, expanding rooftop solar access for public/Māori housing, and pushing zero-interest clean energy loans.

Te Pāti Māori / The Opportunities Party (TOP)

  • Te Pāti Māori: Proposes a $1 billion energy sovereignty fund, a national independent energy plan, and stricter regulation of the energy system focused tightly on public interest and rural capability.

  • TOP: Proposes boosting renewable generation, ring-fencing government profits from state power generators for future green investment, consolidating the 29 energy distributors down to no more than eight, and merging energy regulatory agencies to reduce systemic overhead.

Note: For a detailed overview of candidate lists, electorate profiles, and complete party manifestos as voting progresses, you can check resources on the official Elections New Zealand portal.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I run a café with a small team. Food and power costs are squeezing margins, customers are spending less, and we've experienced a break-in. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. What would parties do about electricity costs for small businesses?

AI Overview

Running a hospitality business under compounding financial squeeze and a stressful event like a break-in is incredibly tough.

For the 2026 New Zealand general election , political parties are addressing rising commercial and domestic electricity costs through distinct market-driven, regulatory, and infrastructural proposals:

Political Party Core Energy Market Strategy Impact on Small Businesses
National Electrify NZ 2.0
• Focuses on cutting red tape to fast-track renewable generation.
• Prefers capital raises and regulatory tweaks rather than structural intervention. • Intends to lower bills long-term by flooding the grid with cheaper supply.
• Offers the Home Energy Fund (low-interest, rates-repaid loans for solar/heat pumps) and consent exemptions for small-scale installations.
Labour SolarSaver & Market Intervention
• Criminalizes corporate price gouging on essential services like energy.
• Partners directly with businesses for electrification funding. • Proposes expanding the Commerce Commission’s powers to investigate large market players.
• Supports an energy-performance disclosure mandate for leased commercial spaces to keep operational costs visible.
New Zealand First Breaking up the "Gentailers"
• Explicitly pledges a structural, Telecom-style split of the big four power companies (Meridian, Contact, Genesis, Mercury) into distinct generator and retailer branches. • Aims to dismantle vertical integration to enforce genuine retail competition and rapidly drive retail power prices down for small businesses.
• Promises to replace the current spot-market system to prevent companies from artificially throttling supply.
ACT Deregulating for Abundant Supply
• Focuses heavily on resource consent exemptions, simplifying commercial rules, and loosening installation barriers for solar. • Rejects government-funded energy subsidies or loans, arguing the private sector/banks already handle green finance efficiently. Focuses instead on cutting broader operational business compliance.
Green Party KiwiPower State Generation
• Advocates for clean, public-good energy assets and zero-interest clean-energy loans.
• Favours more aggressive structural breakups and nationalization models. • Focuses on shifting commercial infrastructure permanently away from gas dependancy.
• Ties energy relief into a broader economic structural shift targeting high-earning corporate profit structures.

If you are considering how these platforms interact with your other pressures, I can break down what these parties have pledged regarding retail crime/security support or small business tax relief to give you a complete picture for your vote. Which of those areas would you like to explore next?

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account