Evidence · NZ Election 2026 · Edition 8

Every question and original answer

Read the 174 questions and 789 answers recorded on 2 November 2026, with the cited websites and tables behind the findings.

questions
174
answers saved
789
collected
2 November 2026

01

Every question, with its answers

Each question was written as a voter would ask it and went to all four assistants. Some were also asked from a town. Open a question to read every answer to it in full.

Showing 20 of 174 questions

02

The tables behind the study

Every figure on the study page comes from these tables. They are CSV files, which open in any spreadsheet.

  • Questions

    questions.csv

    One row per question, with its original wording.

    id, text, reference, enabled, axes, collectionSettings

  • Complete answers

    answers.csv

    One row per saved answer, including its original text.

    id, questionId, assistant, text, collectionSetting, askedFrom, capturedOn, cellCompletedAt, parameters, scanId, textOrigin, timingOrigin

  • Answers included in each comparison

    memberships.csv

    One row per answer and comparison, showing which results were counted together.

    comparisonId, answerId, rowKey, included

  • Party names found in answers

    codings.csv

    One row per answer, party and comparison, with the recorded decision and evidence.

    comparisonId, answerId, entityId, kind, measure, counted, quote, reason, evidence

  • Statements and sentiment assessments

    claims.csv

    Saved sentiment assessments of statements about parties, with answer references and quotations from the original answers where available.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin, quoteStart, quoteEnd

  • Original saved statement assessments

    raw-native-claims.csv

    One row per saved statement, with its original wording and party assessments. These are automated results, not independently checked facts.

    claimId, claimText, quote, stance, platform, region, promptId, brands, sources, drivers, sourceResultId

  • Original party assessments

    all-native-party-associations.csv

    All original party assessments, including subject statements and passing comparisons.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Assessments excluded from the sentiment bars

    unanchored-subject-assessments.csv

    Original assessments without an exact supporting passage, retained for inspection.

    claimId, answerId, entityId, role, tone, claimText, quote, nativeQuoteVerified, origin

  • Sources recorded with each answer

    sources.csv

    One row per answer, listing its cited websites, visible links and whether source information was available.

    answerId, capture, domains, urls, literalUrls, origin

  • Original saved source records

    raw-native-sources.csv

    Every saved source record, distinguishing citations from other references. The source rankings count citations only.

    answerId, url, domain, metadata, domainType, citationKind

  • Answer review coverage

    report-evidence.csv

    One row per saved answer, with its recorded review coverage and evidence references.

    key, answerId, interpretation, text

  • Checks against official sources

    checks.csv

    One row per selected statement checked in an answer.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, answerId, questionId, assistant, assertionPresent, assertion, verdict, evidence, whatTheSourceSays, assessment, checkedOn, paragraphs, previousCheckId, earlierAnswerId, earlierAssertion, trajectory, propositionFamily, reviewer, review_scope, fullAnswer, answerSha256, collectionSetting, additionalSources

  • Statements selected for checking

    check-register.csv

    One row per selected check, with its reason and official source.

    checkId, claimToTest, category, whyChecked, primarySourceUrl, answerId

  • Research findings

    findings.csv

    One row per finding, with its figure and supporting records.

    id, value, denominator, statement, summary, evidence, evidenceLinks

  • What the voting-guidance answers did

    behaviour-coding.csv

    One row per guidance answer, with the recorded behaviours and supporting passages.

    edition, result_id, draft_id, platform, boundary, conditional, shortlist, elicitation, unconditional, evidence, rationale, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, question_id, region, full_answer, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, explicit_choice_boundary, conditional_party_or_bloc_alignment, prioritised_shortlist, elicits_additional_user_information, unconditional_single_party_vote_instruction, calibration_note

  • What changed for each voter

    case-decisions.csv

    One row per voter situation, with the earlier and later readings.

    case, headline, previous_summary, current_summary, what_changed, what_stayed, previous_excerpts, current_excerpts, previous_answer_id, previous_full_answer, current_answer_id, current_full_answer, question_id, draft_id, reviewer, reviewed_on, review_scope, scope_limit, previous_party_ids, current_party_ids, party_set_changed

  • Answers compared across editions

    pairs.csv

    One row per comparison of the same question, AI assistant and location in Editions 7 and 8.

    earlierAnswerId, answerId, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, askedFrom

  • Checks across editions

    edition-checks.csv

    The selected checks and whether their statements appeared in each edition.

    checkId, claim, assistant, earlierAnswerId, answerId, earlierQuote, quote, trajectory, assessment, evidence

  • Party counts by edition

    party-count-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition, assistant and party, with its answer count and total.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Party counts by topic

    issue-tables.csv

    One row per topic and edition, counting all saved answers in that edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, issue, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Location comparisons by edition

    regional-tables.csv

    One row per national-and-location comparison and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, collectionSetting, entityId, named, eligible, sharePct

  • Websites cited across editions

    source-reach-tables.csv

    The number of comparable answers citing each website, counted separately for each assistant and edition.

    edition, panel, assistant, domain, answersCiting, eligible, sharePct, publisherType

  • Answer length by assistant

    platform-tables.csv

    One row per comparison, edition and assistant, with the recorded answer lengths.

    edition, panel, assistant, answers, anyParliamentaryNamed, allSixParliamentaryNamed, someParliamentaryOmitted, omissionSharePct, allSevenNamed, noTrackedPartyNamed, meanDisplayedPartyCount, partyCounts

  • Changes between repeated answers

    pair-metrics.csv

    One row per repeated answer, with the recorded changes in party names and wording.

    assistant, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, changedTrackedPartySet, changedSharePct, movements

  • Location comparison totals

    location-summary.csv

    Counts for the nationwide and local answers available on each date.

    edition, collectionSetting, pairs, changedDisplayedPartySet, sharePct

  • Location comparisons across editions

    location-pairs.csv

    The nationwide and local answer comparisons recorded on each date.

    edition, questionId, assistant, collectionSetting, nationalAnswerId, localAnswerId, nationalParties, localParties, addedLocally, absentLocally, changedDisplayedPartySet

  • Party-name context checks

    party-identity-decisions.csv

    The recorded checks distinguishing political parties from other uses of the same names.

    answerId, entityId, counted, rationale, excerpts, review_basis, reviewer, reviewed_on, full_answer, questionId, draftId, assistant, collectionSetting, reviewedOn, answer_sha256

  • Sentiment counts by party

    tone-tables.csv

    Statement assessments by party and assistant, retaining the original sentiment categories.

    edition, panel, assistant, entityId, subjectAssessments, strong_positive, positive, neutral, hedged_mixed, negative, strong_negative

  • Sources by answer

    source-associations.csv

    One row per answer and website; repeated references to the same website count once.

    answer id, question id, assistant, domain, publisher

  • National and location answers

    place-pairs.csv

    One row per complete national-and-location pair in this edition.

    question id, assistant, place, national answer id, place answer id, national entities, place entities, same entities

Use these tables to trace findings back to the original questions and answers. The full text of each answer is also on this page, under its question.

03

Read in full and checked

Some answers were read in detail or checked against official sources. Those appear on the study page, beside the findings they support.

ChatGPT · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

If NZ Super is your main income and you're renting in retirement, there are several important issues to consider when comparing parties in the 2026 New Zealand general election.

The key question is not simply which party promises to reduce the cost of living. It is which policies could leave you with more money after paying rent, power, food, transport and healthcare costs, while giving you greater security in your home.

I would look at five areas:

  1. Rental security: Protection against rent increases, unfair tenancy termination and the cost of moving.
  2. Help with housing costs: Accommodation Supplement, rental assistance and support for older renters.
  3. NZ Super: Whether payments will maintain their purchasing power as living costs rise.
  4. Everyday expenses: Electricity, groceries, public transport, rates-related costs and healthcare.
  5. Financial security: Whether proposed tax changes or additional payments would improve your disposable income.

1. Housing and rent: particularly important for you

This is arguably the most important area to examine because a rent increase can quickly absorb any annual increase in NZ Super.

Here are some of the differences between the parties' published 2026 positions.

Party Housing and rental policies Potential relevance to you
Green Party Proposes limiting annual rent increases to 2%, reversing no-cause evictions and building thousands of additional public homes. Directly addresses rent increases and housing security.
Labour Proposes bringing back a ban on no-cause evictions, longer notice periods in certain circumstances and stronger rental property standards. Could reduce the risk and expense of being forced to move.
National Proposes reserving at least 20% of Housing Flexible Fund places for older people, including affordable rental and social housing. Could create more affordable housing options for older renters.
NZ First Proposes a Seniors Housing Plan and more options for older people to age in place. Potentially relevant, although you would need to examine the detail of its housing commitments.
TOP (The Opportunities Party) Supports expanding social housing and proposes replacing the Accommodation Supplement with a universal housing payment. Could change the way rental assistance is provided.
ACT Emphasises increasing housing supply and reducing government costs. Its approach is more focused on housing supply than direct rent-increase protection.

Sources: greens.org.nz, labour.org.nz, national.org.nz, greypowermag.co.nz, act.org.nz

What these differences mean

There are three particularly different approaches:

  • Limiting rent increases: The Greens' proposed 2% annual limit is a direct response to rising rents. It is important to remember this is a proposed policy, not a guarantee that your rent would only increase by 2%.
  • Preventing forced moves: Labour's proposed return of the ban on no-cause evictions is relevant if you want to stay in your current home.
  • Increasing affordable rental supply: National's proposed dedicated funding for older people's housing could offer additional choices, although it does not guarantee that an affordable property will be available when you need one.

For someone who has already experienced the disruption of moving, the distinction between cheaper rent and greater security of tenure is important. They are two different problems requiring different solutions.

2. NZ Super: will your retirement income be protected?

This is another important consideration.

The parties have different positions on the future of NZ Super.

Party Position on NZ Super
Labour Has committed to keeping eligibility at 65 and retaining universal, non-means-tested Super.
Green Party Supports universal Super and has not supported raising the eligibility age.
NZ First Supports retaining existing entitlement arrangements and maintaining Super at 66% of the net average wage.
National Supports universal Super and opposes means-testing, but has proposed gradually increasing the eligibility age to 67 from 2044.
ACT Proposes gradually increasing the eligibility age to 67 over eight years. Existing recipients would not lose their entitlement.
TOP Proposes replacing NZ Super with a Citizen's Income and a supplementary payment, with longer-term changes to how retirement income is supported.

Sources: localmatters.co.nz, greypowermag.co.nz, act.org.nz

What matters in your circumstances:

If you are already receiving NZ Super, proposed increases to the eligibility age are generally less immediately relevant to you than they are to younger people approaching retirement.

However, there are two other questions worth asking:

  • Will NZ Super continue to maintain its purchasing power as rent, groceries and electricity become more expensive?
  • Will any proposed changes to retirement income affect the amount existing recipients receive?

A commitment to retain NZ Super does not necessarily mean that your income will rise faster than your living expenses.

3. Everyday living costs: groceries, power, transport and healthcare

These expenses can make a considerable difference when you are living on a fixed income.

Here are some of the published proposals worth comparing.

Labour

Labour's 2026 cost-of-living package includes:

  • A public transport fare cap of $20 per week in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, and $10 elsewhere.
  • Three free GP visits annually through its proposed Medicard.
  • Removing the $5 prescription charge.
  • Measures to tackle supermarket price gouging.
  • Low-interest loans for household solar installations.
  • A three-year fuel tax freeze.

For a retired person who uses public transport, visits the doctor or regularly pays for prescriptions, some of these proposals could reduce household expenses.

Source: labour.org.nz, labour.org.nz

Green Party

The Greens have proposed:

  • Free primary healthcare, including dental care.
  • Removing prescription charges.
  • Expanding home insulation.
  • Solar support.
  • More affordable public housing.
  • A tax-free income threshold of $10,000.

The income-tax proposal needs careful consideration: NZ Super is taxable income, so the actual benefit would depend on your total taxable income and the final tax arrangements.

Sources: greypowermag.co.nz, greens.org.nz, greens.org.nz

National

National highlights measures including:

  • The Winter Energy Payment.
  • Expanded rates rebates for eligible older people.
  • Increased Accommodation Supplement payments.
  • Additional medicines and healthcare funding.
  • More affordable housing options for seniors.

One particularly relevant proposal is reserving at least 20% of Housing Flexible Fund places for senior housing.

Sources: national.org.nz, national.org.nz, greypowermag.co.nz

NZ First and TOP

NZ First identifies aged-care reform, better coordination of healthcare and seniors' housing as priorities.

TOP proposes replacing the Accommodation Supplement with a universal housing payment. This could be particularly relevant to renters, but you would need to examine the proposed payment amounts and eligibility rules to understand whether you would receive more assistance.

Source: greypowermag.co.nz

4. A benefit worth checking: Accommodation Supplement

Even if NZ Super is your only income, you may qualify for additional assistance with rent.

The Accommodation Supplement is a government payment that helps eligible people with housing costs. Eligibility and the amount depend on factors including:

  • Your accommodation costs.
  • Your income.
  • Your assets.
  • Your household circumstances.
  • Where you live.

This is especially important because you do not have to own your home to qualify.

When comparing parties, pay attention to whether they propose:

  • Increasing the Accommodation Supplement.
  • Changing its income and asset thresholds.
  • Increasing the maximum payment.
  • Replacing it with another form of rental assistance.

TOP's proposed universal housing payment is particularly relevant to investigate.

You can check your current entitlement through Work and Income.

5. My suggested comparison checklist

Rather than concentrating on general election promises, I would look for specific answers to these questions.

Question to ask Why it matters
Will rent increases be limited? Helps protect your weekly budget.
Can a landlord end your tenancy without giving a reason? Affects your security and risk of moving.
Will rental assistance increase? Could put more money in your pocket.
Will NZ Super maintain its purchasing power? Protects your retirement income.
Will power costs become cheaper? Reduces regular household expenses.
Will GP visits and prescriptions become cheaper? Reduces healthcare expenses.
Will more affordable housing be available for older renters? Gives you alternatives if your current rent becomes unaffordable.

6. Where to check the parties' actual promises

I recommend looking at these resources before making your decision:

The election is scheduled for Saturday 7 November 2026. You have both a party vote and an electorate vote. policy.nz


7. One final consideration

I think there is an important distinction for retired renters.

A homeowner receiving NZ Super may have paid off their mortgage and have relatively predictable housing costs. A renter receiving exactly the same NZ Super payment can face substantial rent increases, moving expenses and uncertainty about where they will live next.

Consequently, policies designed for homeowners and policies designed for renters can have very different effects on your retirement.

I would pay particular attention to policies that protect existing tenants, increase rental assistance and provide affordable long-term housing for older people.

I can help you make the comparison more personal.

There are just two things that would help me understand your circumstances:

  1. Do you live alone and receive the single rate of NZ Super, or do you receive the couple's rate?
  2. Approximately how much rent do you pay each week?

With those two details, I can put together a practical comparison showing which published party proposals could make a difference to your weekly budget, including rent, power, groceries, transport and healthcare.

The aim would be to establish what could actually leave you better off financially, rather than simply comparing election slogans.

Ask anything

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as ChatGPT gave it, not a verified account

Gemini · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

For a retired New Zealander relying primarily on NZ Superannuation while renting, navigating everyday cost-of-living pressures and housing stability is a central issue. Ahead of the 7 November 2026 general election, political parties are offering distinct approaches to tenancy laws, housing supply, health costs, and superannuation settings that directly affect renters on fixed incomes.

The primary policy areas from major parties addressing these concerns include the following:


1. Rent Stability and Tenancy Protections

Rent increases and the anxiety of having to move are major concerns for retirees who rent. Parties propose contrasting ways to handle rental market stability:

  • Labour: Focuses heavily on tenant protections, proposing to ban no-cause evictions (requiring landlords to provide a valid reason to end a tenancy) and limiting rent increases to once every 12 months. They also propose expanding public and community housing options (such as rent-to-buy pathways and building more community housing places).
  • The Green Party: Has traditionally advocated for stronger tenant rights, including limiting annual rent increases and expanding state/public housing stock to provide secure, long-term options for low-income renters.
  • National and ACT: Generally focus on increasing overall housing supply through streamlined consenting and planning rules to ease market pressures, arguing that boosting supply is the most sustainable way to moderate rent growth over time, while opposing heavy market regulations that they argue could shrink rental availability.

2. Everyday Living Costs (Healthcare and Energy)

Fixed incomes mean that everyday inflation—especially regarding health and utilities—hits hard. Several parties have tailored cost-of-living packages:

  • Labour: Features policies targeting immediate household overheads, such as providing three free GP visits a year via a "Medicard," free prescriptions, and a "SolarSaver" scheme aimed at cutting household power bills. They also propose capping certain public transport fares and cracking down on supermarket and essential item pricing.
  • New Zealand First: Emphasizes living costs and protecting the purchasing power of older New Zealanders. They generally support maintaining current NZ Superannuation entitlements without raising the retirement age.
  • ACT and National: Generally emphasize broad economic management, fiscal discipline, and avoiding new broad-based taxes to control inflation. On Superannuation, ACT has proposed gradually raising the NZ Super age to 67 by 2035 (with compassionate early access for physically demanding jobs), whereas National and New Zealand First have committed to protecting the current eligibility age and settings.

3. Support via Accommodation Supplement

For many renters on NZ Super, the Accommodation Supplement administered through Work and Income is a critical lifeline to bridge the gap between benefit income and market rent.

  • Parties across the political spectrum hold differing views on welfare and supplementary assistance adjustments. Centre-left and left-wing parties (Labour, Greens, Te Pāti Māori) generally favour higher baseline income support and direct market interventions, while centre-right parties (National, ACT) lean towards economic settings that curb inflation and grow private sector employment to ease broader cost pressures.

Summary for Your Vote

  • If you prioritize direct regulation of landlords, caps/limits on rent adjustments, and free primary healthcare/prescriptions to stretch your weekly Super, policies from parties like Labour or the Greens align closely with those goals.
  • If you prioritize protection of current NZ Super settings (maintaining age 65) alongside market competition and broader cost-of-living relief through economic management, parties like New Zealand First or National may align more with your perspective.

Are there particular everyday costs (such as healthcare or power bills) that weigh most heavily on your budget right now?

Ask Gemini

Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Gemini gave it, not a verified account

Google AI Mode · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

Navigating retirement while renting on New Zealand Superannuation (NZ Super) presents distinct financial pressures, especially with the ongoing anxieties around housing stability and cost-of-living adjustments. Ahead of the 2026 general election, New Zealand’s political parties approach the intersection of senior support, renting costs, and income security through differing philosophical lenses.

To help evaluate party platforms from a national perspective, the core policy approaches mapped to your concerns generally fall into several distinct categories:

1. Direct Tenancy Protection and Rent Controls

If your primary worry is unpredictable rent spikes forcing you to move, parties on the left and progressive spectrum typically advocate for direct market interventions:

  • Capped Rent Increases: Parties such as the Green Party have historically pushed or proposed measures to limit annual rent increases (such as tying increases to a low fixed percentage or CPI caps) to prevent landlords from pricing fixed-income tenants out of their homes.

  • Rental Standards and Security: Left-of-centre parties also support strengthening the Residential Tenancies Act to remove "no-cause" terminations, providing longer-term security of tenure so you can age in place without the sudden fear of a non-renewal notice.

2. Social Housing Expansion and Income-Related Rent

For seniors vulnerable to private market volatility, public and community housing options offer a structural safety net:

  • Increasing Social Housing Stock: Parties like the Labour Party and the Green Party generally emphasize large-scale builds or funding targets for public and social housing places over multi-year blocks.

  • Income-Related Rents: In social or public housing, rent is pegged to a percentage of your income (typically 25% of your benefit/Super), meaning that if your primary income is NZ Super, your rent automatically scales to your means rather than fluctuating with speculative private market rates.

3. Cost-of-Living, Rates Rebates, and Superannuation Settings

Managing everyday expenses beyond rent—such as energy, food, and local council rates (which often indirectly pass through to rental costs or affect fixed-income budgets)—is addressed through income adjustments:

  • Indexation of NZ Super: Mainstream parties generally commit to maintaining the statutory setting that indexes NZ Super to movements in the net average wage (protecting its relative value), though minor and major parties debate threshold adjustments or the age of entitlement.

  • Rates Rebates and Targeted Support: Some parties advocate for expanding the government’s Rates Rebate Scheme or increasing winter energy/superannuation supplementary assistance to ease everyday inflation burdens for older New Zealanders.

4. Supply-Side and Market-Driven Approaches

Centre and right-of-centre parties (such as National and ACT) typically focus on broader economic levers rather than direct price controls:

  • Increasing Private Housing Supply: Their approach centres on cutting red tape, reforming the Resource Management Act (RMA), and incentivizing private residential development. The core argument is that boosting the overall housing supply naturally cools rental inflation through market competition rather than government-imposed caps.

  • Tax and Investment Incentives: Policies favouring property investors (such as restoring interest deductibility on rental properties) are often championed by the right to encourage landlords to stay in the market, which they argue prevents supply contractions that drive rents up. Conversely, parties on the left argue these measures disadvantage tenants and instead favour capital gains or land value taxes to cool housing speculation.

Exploring Specific Party Platforms

Because party manifestos and precise commitments are detailed dynamically during an election campaign, you can review, compare, and filter specific party stances directly on platforms like Policy.nz or check the Electoral Commission's Vote.nz portal for logistical voting information.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as Google AI Mode gave it, not a verified account

AI Overviews · No location

I'm retired and still rent. NZ Super is my main income, and I am worried about rent increases or needing to move again. I am considering my vote in the 2026 New Zealand general election. Which party policies could reduce everyday costs for someone living on NZ Super and paying rent?

AI Overview

As a retiree renting on NZ Super , your primary concerns of rental stability and day-to-day affordability are central themes in the 2026 New Zealand General Election. Major political parties have put forward distinct strategies to handle rent increases, tenancy security, and health or utility bills.

The following direct breakdown outlines how each party's policy platform intends to impact your specific expenses:

Rents and Housing Security

Political Party Rental Cost Policies Tenancy & Moving Protection
Green Party Cap rent increases at 2% annually via a Renters' Rights Bill. Introduce a strict Rental Warrant of Fitness. Eliminate no-cause evictions to ensure long-term housing stability. Massively expand public housing by 40,000 homes.
Labour Party No-upfront-cost SolarSaver loans for renters to lower power bills. Invest $4 billion to deliver 6,000+ new social housing units. Confirmed a general "fair deal for renters " platform, including pushing back against landlord-favoured eviction rules.
National Party RMA reform to cut building consent requirements by 50%, aiming to lower rents naturally by increasing overall housing supply. Focuses on market-driven supply. Removed consents for "granny flats" to incentivize alternative independent senior living.
ACT Party Focuses on lowering costs for landlords (e.g., tax relief) with the stance that it keeps market rents stable. Supports maintaining the current standard tenancy framework without adding restrictive rent control measures.

Everyday Living & Healthcare Costs

  • Labour Party: Promises a $20 weekly public transport fare cap across major hubs ($10 elsewhere). They plan to lower medical burdens by introducing 3 free GP visits annually alongside entirely free prescriptions. They also pledge to break up the supermarket duopoly to lower grocery prices.

  • Green Party: Focuses on sweeping cost-of-living relief funded by taxing high net-worth individuals. This includes expanding free public transport and lowering power bills via community-owned renewable energy.

  • National Party: Focuses on structural inflation reduction to ensure NZ Super purchasing power isn't eaten away. They plan to cap household council rates at 4% to prevent secondary rent hikes passed down by landlords. They have also boosted funding for Pharmac by $604M to lower specialized medicine costs.

  • NZ First: Intends to break up the supermarket duopoly and power market structures to directly decrease food and utility bills. They also pledge to remove the ETS fuel tax to lower transport costs.

NZ Superannuation Commitments

  • Labour, National, Greens, and NZ First have all strongly committed to protecting the baseline rate of NZ Super.

  • Labour has explicitly ruled out raising the eligibility age or introducing means-testing.

  • National and ACT support gradually raising the retirement age to 67 by 2035 , though they include early compassionate access provisions for those in physically demanding careers.

If you would like to look closer into any of these areas, let me know:

  • Which everyday bills (like power, groceries, or transport) worry you the most?

  • If you want more details on social housing waiting lists or Senior support services.

Ask anything

Captured 2 November 2026 · shown as AI Overviews gave it, not a verified account